Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Jenn Smith is a transgender male (born male, expressing fem)

68 replies

loveyouradvice · 23/06/2018 16:58

... I have just discovered them... wonderfully outspoken and clear about needing to protect the rights of women and children in Canada.... and this is how they describe themselves

But this does so expose the challenge of finding a suitable name for transpeople that all can agree on. Let alone which personal pronouns!

At the moment confusion reins - with people new to the debate (like I was just a few months ago) not clear about which sex/gender transmen and transwomen represent as names - what is appropriate to say (or not say) e.g. TIM, MtF, etc.

It is likely that a name will emerge that all can agree on - a compromise I hope without women giving up the name women, for example.

Does anyone have any idea what it might be?

Personally I am in favour of the clarity of Jenn's approach - calling themselves a transgender male, recognising that what they are doing is expanding the bandwidth of what being male is - and believe that if this was consistently used, in time he would no longer need to use the brackets with fuller explanation.

OP posts:
Pratchet · 23/06/2018 19:22

Jenn actually changed twitter bio away from 'male to female' after being called on it by feminists. I'm slightly concerned at the follower/followed ratio though. Lecturer rather than listener? Don't know but I agree with much of what Jenn says.

spontaneousgiventime · 23/06/2018 19:17

Kettlepotblackagain Agree. I hate that I'm either expected to play nice or lie. NO!

Kettlepotblackagain · 23/06/2018 19:16

I know don't worry Spontaneous, didn't mean to come across harsh just wanted to explain as I can't stand being treated like a child X

spontaneousgiventime · 23/06/2018 19:09

Kettlepotblackagain I know what you mean. Sorry for coming across as if I was belittling what you meant, it wasn't intended that way. I'm still very peeved by that thread, it was bone chilling.

spontaneousgiventime · 23/06/2018 19:08

womanformallyknownaswoman That poster caused a lot of hurt and upset today. There is the full thread in a PDF in the other place if anyone missed it. They did troll and they caused distress to many women. I am not going onto the naughty step for telling the truth.

Kettlepotblackagain · 23/06/2018 19:07

The naughty step was a reference to, quite frankly, the patronising way adult women are being treated. I'm not actually feeling like I am on the naughty step. Far from it.

No prizes for guessing what happened there. They add absolutely nothing to the debate, yet are able to patrol around all the threads throwing out disgusting and offensive comments, reporting left right and centre silencing women.

What I said still stands too. I'll call out bullying when I see it.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 23/06/2018 19:05

spontaneousgiventime

You expressed the collective consciousness of most women here - trolling is despicable

loveyouradvice · 23/06/2018 19:04

TG - Talk Guidelines of course! Mumsnet, if you are reading this it would be great if you posted in full rather than initials for those who are not familiar with shortened forms!

OP posts:
spontaneousgiventime · 23/06/2018 19:01

Oo. I've been deleted. My post might not stand but what I said does and the person it was aimed at probably read it and ran to tell teacher. I'm not going on the naughty step.

Datun · 23/06/2018 19:01

Snappity

This appears goady to me.

What is goady is you telling women who struggle with fertility, that transwomen who can father children, like Caitlyn Jenner, are, in fact, infertile women and should have the right to a womb implant.

Norther · 23/06/2018 18:57

Also sisters be careful. I suspect some people use threads like this to force strikes on some of us and myself and others need you to learn from and develop our understanding/argument/resolve.

IStillMissBlockbuster · 23/06/2018 18:55

I have no idea what that means

SeahorsesAREhorses · 23/06/2018 18:54

They have written some really interesting pieces,

Jen is an old school transvestite and doesn't appropriate womanhood.

I remember when appropriation was a bad thing, happy days.

Kettlepotblackagain · 23/06/2018 18:53

Talk Guidelines I think

Norther · 23/06/2018 18:50

Its the policing I cant stand. You can call yourself whatever you like. I just dont want to be obliged to accept the terminology. The best I can do out of courtesy (which I can choose to offer or withhold) is to avoid all pronouns and just always use someones name. I vehemently object to legal fudging and legal recognition for anything other than biological reality although I accept, having worked in that field previously, that the law operates very differently to science (science likes a bright line, the law absolutely does not - I think that is why people get confused sometimes).

loveyouradvice · 23/06/2018 18:50

Feeling dumb here - what does TG stand for??? Thanks

OP posts:
SophieLMumsnet · 23/06/2018 18:47

We're just hopping on to wave TGs - please do keep the debate civil and avoid personal attacks. Flowers

womanformallyknownaswoman · 23/06/2018 18:24

YY Prawn

Jenn Smith refers to themselves as a transgender identified male - are we to be sanctioned for misgendering / misnaming them in order to comply with some arbitrary doublethink that enables bullying of women?

Policing of speech is a very very slippery slope

Prawnofthepatriarchy · 23/06/2018 18:18

The TRAs seem to reject terms that accurately describe an individual's sex. When this preference take precedence it has a quelling effect on debate. It's tricky to avoid mentioning someone's sex when this is the only feature about them relevant to your discussion.

Who holds the power in this situation is very, very obvious. It's women who are being silenced and, when not silenced, muted. I am so disappointed in MNHQ for caving to pressure from hateful misogynists.

Imnobody4 · 23/06/2018 18:03

I have a lot of respect for Jenn Smith. Has both guts and integrity.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 23/06/2018 18:01

Thank You OP for bringing to our attention a transgender person who meets us in our critical thinking

BlackeyedSusan · 23/06/2018 18:00

transwomen/transman are confusing though if you are new to the debate.

it takes a while to work out which way they are going.

just get the hang of one set of words and they are banned and another set are introduced. It is hard to keep up.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 23/06/2018 18:00

I like Jenn Smith - they talk sense and completely understand the undue influence young people are subjected to via social media being weaponised. And why do we have to reject the terms that Jenn describes themselves as - a transgender identified male. I have zero problem with their writing and thinking - particularly their insights into the vulnerability of pre-trans youth:

and in this sense pre-trans youths are already blank slates awaiting a new identity, because there can be no greater a rejection of self than to reject one’s own body and biological self.

They get that body distress is at the root of the confusion of many young people - but that there are multiple causes -as the post Taking it out on your body illustrates. This is a complex area and doesn't warrant black and white, simplistic approaches.

I would go along with this trans person, based on what I have read of theirs - they are remarkedly well researched around cults and coercion and catching people when they are vulnerable and then subjecting them to undue influence, for the gain of vested interests.

I'd like to @MNHQ have them on for a Q&A

Kettlepotblackagain · 23/06/2018 17:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

spontaneousgiventime · 23/06/2018 17:53

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.