Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Time to get the 'L' out!

133 replies

LaSqrrl · 18/06/2018 11:39

Facebook just killed another Women's Liberation page (I did not follow it), upon the pressure placed by another page/group called 'Queer Librarian'.

The Women's Liberation Radio News page got targeted because they reported on Baltimore Pride, where a number of lesbians held WL signs. The WLRN page also reported that prior to the event, the Baltimore Transgender Alliance stated "terfs will be hung by their necks". This reporting of BTA by WLRN, incited the Queer Librarian page to gather ranks and report the WLRN page. (You will get the drift by looking at the screengrabs).

Lesbians are no longer welcome at Pride(!) and clearly, anyone that reports what is going on is targeted and banned.

Time to get the 'L' out!
Time to get the 'L' out!
Time to get the 'L' out!
OP posts:
daimbars · 18/06/2018 20:05

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Bowlofbabelfish · 18/06/2018 20:04

The TRAs and GC feminists are as bad as each other.

Trump used this in charlottville.

It’s not true. GC feminists are debating, talking, and using peaceful, hunourous protest (man Friday.) a lot of letters have been written. Groups have met to talk and made sure that transpeople are invited as well.
What GC feminists have NOT done: punched a sixty year old woman to the floor. Hounded women off Twitter, set up exhibitions of weapons to be used to kill the other side. Made bomb threats. Made death threats. Made rape threats. Blocked the other side from attending peaceful meetings while masked up.

One side is absolutely not as bad as the other. Find me examples of feminist violence - because I haven’t seen any, but ive seen a tsunami of abuse directed at them.

PencilsInSpace · 18/06/2018 20:00

The TRAs and GC feminists are as bad as each other.

No. This is deeply offensive bullshit.

ResistanceIsNecessary · 18/06/2018 19:59

I have just fallen down the DL rabbit hole.

I now know more than I ever thought I would about surgically created vaginas and penises. There are posters advising that they can instantly tell the difference between natal sex organs and those which have been surgically created (with very graphic descriptions and detail which I won't share here).

The consensus of opinion there is overwhelmingly "no" to having sex with someone who does not have the expected sex organs which would typically accompany their stated sexual orientation.

One poster made a good point about wondering why it is discriminatory to say that he only intends on having sex with a penis but that it's fine for him to say that he's only interested in dark haired men.

A final point which stood out for me; the fact that "sexual orientation" is being replaced with "sexual preference". Needless to say that the majority of posters on the DL thread I was reading, felt that this was intensely homophobic and designed to erase lesbian, gay and bisexual people.

daimbars · 18/06/2018 19:52

The TRAs and GC feminists are as bad as each other. Ideally both groups would stay away so the rest of us can enjoy a happy pride.

PencilsInSpace · 18/06/2018 19:41

Superb twitter thread here by @PankhurstEM.

(warning - contains numerous screenshots of 'jokes' about violence against T*s).

Pride is dead.

PencilsInSpace · 18/06/2018 19:24

daimbars: white people displaying racist placards at black pride wouldn't be welcome ... and ... it still wouldn't be cool to display anything some black people felt to be racist at black pride.

Also daimbars discussing a 'joke' about lynching gender critical feminists: Yes that last joke was not in particularly good taste but you are really scraping the barrel if that is your 'evidence' of trans people inciting violence on lesbians!

You're doing the work for us. Please do carry on.

BettyDuMonde · 18/06/2018 18:47

The data lounge posters definitely do not try and tie themselves up in knots over PC language.

It’s really refreshing (if terribly impolite).

Apparently it’s one of the few places gay men get to critique TRA ideology without fear of over moderation...

Time to get the 'L' out!
JuzzaL · 18/06/2018 18:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JuzzaL · 18/06/2018 18:40

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Bowlofbabelfish · 18/06/2018 18:31

Gay men are starting to come under attack for "discriminatory dating preferences

That is interesting. I wonder if men will be allowed the ‘no’ that women are denied?

JuzzaL · 18/06/2018 18:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Whatzat298 · 18/06/2018 18:27

It isn't homosexual if one of you is bisexual

I'm probably going to regret asking this, but do you believe anyone is a lesbian if they have previously had relationships with men? Does any contact with cock put them into the bisexual box? And then that negate any same sex relationship they have as "not lesbian" regardless of their partner's penis touching status?

BettyDuMonde · 18/06/2018 18:23

(I’d post links but it’s a very NSFW site!)

BettyDuMonde · 18/06/2018 18:19

The forum data lounge has had a number of posts complaining about the numbers of cervix-havers on hook up apps such as Grindr.

CircleSquareCircleSquare · 18/06/2018 18:19

Twitter user complaining that their trans status has reduced the amount of interest they get on Grindr

My ugly status would reduce the amount of interest I would get on dating apps, should I divorce my partner.

ResistanceIsNecessary · 18/06/2018 18:12

Gay men are starting to come under attack for "discriminatory dating preferences:

I find this article somewhat alarming - talk of "the 1 percent" has echoes of incel-style language.

Twitter user complaining that their trans status has reduced the amount of interest they get on Grindr

CircleSquareCircleSquare · 18/06/2018 18:06

Thanks for the clarification @daimbars.

daimbars · 18/06/2018 18:01

@CircleSquareCircleSquare I'm a biological, natal female assigned female at birth and so is my wife. Neither of us are attracted to men. Even posted my civil partnership on another thread! Apparently not good enough.

daimbars · 18/06/2018 17:58

That screen shot isn't from the Transgender Alliance? It's a Facebook event created by an individual for a LGBT club night called Queer Qrush.

Yes that last joke was not in particularly good taste but you are really scraping the barrel if that is your 'evidence' of trans people inciting violence on lesbians! Confused

SomeDyke · 18/06/2018 17:56

"Two biological females in a relationship with each other.

It isn't homosexual if one of you is bisexual. "

I'm confused! Used to be that two females in a relationship was a homosexual relationship. If either or both also had relationships with males those (could be?) labelled heterosexual, since the label is for the mix of sexes in the relationship being referred to, which is different to the sexual orientation of the individual participants?

Although if two females wanted to call their relationship a bisexual relationship since they both were bisexual, that would be logical too. A lesbian in a relationship with a bisexual female, surely she gets to call her relationship a lesbian relationship if she wants to?

I'll go and draw a Venn diagram or such I guess...................

SomeDyke · 18/06/2018 17:51

Yeah, note the 'we are terribly inclusive' rhetoric, whilst not being wheelchair accessible and threatening to hang TERFs.............

So, that would be not accessible and threatening violence against women, is the new (trans)inclusive then...............Or perhaps they think an event is inclusive and accessible if it identifies as such........................

CircleSquareCircleSquare · 18/06/2018 17:50

Are you a trans woman @daimbars?

daimbars · 18/06/2018 17:48

@Prawnofthepatriarchy are you happy that I call myself a lesbian? Seeing as I'm a biological female married to another biological female.

@CircleSquareCircleSquare I have no idea why @JuzzaL Feels like she knows my sexual orientation better than me but for some reason she thinks she does.

It's fair enough to have a debate and challenge me on whether trans women in a relationship with each other should call themselves lesbians. Why make it personal and challenge my own sexuality? It's very personal and very distasteful.

JuzzaL · 18/06/2018 17:42

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Swipe left for the next trending thread