Rachel Johnson's comment from the article above:
"The charity explained that the wording was designed not to offend the small number of women who identify as men.
But my suspicion is that the CRU must have been terrified of obloquy from trans women who don’t have cervixes, but would perhaps protest at any suggestion this means they are not women.
They have – or had – penises, prostates and testes (I await eagerly CRU’s tweet urging ‘everyone with prostate glands’, as opposed to men, to have them checked in due course). To put it uncharitably: the charity seems to think that not triggering trans women trumps saving the lives of women."