Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can we be honest about the need for affirmation?

384 replies

FortunateCookie · 11/06/2018 21:54

I posted some of this on the misgendering thread but it was lost in amongst everything.

I asked on that thread whether refusing to affirm someone’s gender identity was a big deal or not, and many people thought it was, and that it could lead to mental health problems and possibly suicide.

If non- affirmation is so damaging then it also follows that positive affirmation would be extremely rewarding and fulfilling.

It seems obvious that this could lead to serious conflicts of interests. For example, in the case of the woman who asked for a female nurse to carry out her smear test, and was faced with a trans nurse.

Here, when the patients needs should be paramount, she instead becomes either a cause of huge distress, or a vehicle to experience the reward of validation. Either way, it is difficult to see how her needs could be centred against the pull of such a powerful motivation. Do eg hospitals, rape crisis centres recognise this dynamic?

Either it is a big deal that a trans person has their identity affirmed, in which case it should also be recognised that this can cause conflicts of interest in situations where affirmation or not is a factor (ie performing smear tests, working in a women’s refuge)

Or it’s not that big of a deal if a trans person has their identity affirmed and therefore they won’t be offended when a patient asks for a female nurse to carry out their smear.

Which is it?

OP posts:
FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 16:50

NatLuc

If I am reading your post correctly, by reviving health case do you mean the likes of CPR and other emergency situations?

I’m sorry, I’m not sure what “reviving health case means”. But if I’ve got the gist of your point, no I don’t think this would apply to CPR or other situations as here is no validation being requested of the patient in these scenarios, and it would not be expected that you could request a female HCP at these times.

OP posts:
Baroquehavoc · 12/06/2018 16:44

You would be forcing otherwise passing transwomen to go to a mens shelter

If TIM don't want to use men's shelters, the alternative isn't to use women's.

ScienceIsTruth · 12/06/2018 16:40

Really interesting thread. Trying to formulate my views on very little sleep!

You are all so reasoned, passionate and with logical, well thought out points, and I can't understand how people don't get it.

GrinGin

PermissionToSpeakSir · 12/06/2018 16:19

Agreed terfing. It should be acknowledged that these things are either a conflict of interest or a perceived conflict of interest and they should seek other roles.

terfinginthevoid · 12/06/2018 16:12

Sorry haven't read the whole thread, but absolutely agree with the OP that there are serious ethical issues around transwomen who are HCPs seeking validation from patients. To avoid this, I think transwomen who are HCPs should avoid roles where patients are likely to request care from women , for example taking smear tests.

They should also avoid other roles that could give them positive affirmation (or distress if not given), such as bra fitters or rape counsellors.

There are plenty of other jobs they can do.

NatLuc · 12/06/2018 16:11

Baroquehavoc - Must, IMO. But like Poppyred85 said, asking the patient appears to be common place, though in the examples that FortuneCookie and boatyardblues have provided, this does not always appear to be the case.

FortuneCookie - If I am reading your post correctly, by reviving health case do you mean the likes of CPR and other emergency situations? In this instance, I feel that patients comfort is to be waived in favour of patient survival.

With respect to crisis shelters.. I think that the individual situations should be taken in to consideration. But I also understand why someone who having to use these services would feel uneasy about voicing their discomfort to someone they perceive as trans.. I also disagree with the single sex blanket ban. You would be forcing otherwise passing transwomen to go to a mens shelter (which would likely be traumatic for them). And you would still end up in situations whereby transmen would then have to go to the women's shelter which would be equally traumatic for the transman but also potentially add to the trauma of non trans individuals at the women's shelter by being confronted by someone who appears male.

Hotdogjumpingfrogs · 12/06/2018 15:36

Frankly, any excuse to get out of having a smear test

That's so relevant. So many woman avoid smear tests. We have to make woman feel as safe and comfortable as possible because smear tests save lives. Feeling that you might have to be forced to be examined by a transwomen will discourage women from getting the test done.

We need the right to ask for biological females. If transwomen want to work as midwives and nurses fine, that's their right. But females need to be able to request actual females without fear of being labeled as transphobic. In these sorts of circumstances gender should not be relevant, only sex.

BettyDuMonde · 12/06/2018 15:33

Do you believe Muslim women should be excluded from cervical screening?

Lawlsie1976 · 12/06/2018 15:24

I recently had a smear test. It was incredibly painful despite hormone treatment beforehand to try to encourage the cervix to open up a little more.

As some here may know, the smear test post menopause can be very painful.

No I would not want a transwoman to perform the test and I would refuse. Frankly, any excuse to get out of having a smear test would be fine by me! I had a very intimate discussion with the nurse doing the test. She of course has had to go through them too. And that matters to me. Empathy can only go so far. There is no equivalent for men you can compare a painful smear test to.

I don't want a man doing a smear test and I don't want a woman who used to be a man doing it. My needs as a patient should come before the healthcare professional or where does this end?

user1471451327 · 12/06/2018 14:41

Whilst slightly at tangent, in that the transwomen was a patient, the idea that someone in a healthcare setting is labelled transphobic for objecting to effectively mixed wards is horrifying but seems to be the approach now when it comes to healthcare policy metro.co.uk/2018/01/14/woman-who-feared-men-accused-of-transphobia-after-objecting-to-hospital-room-with-trans-woman-7227597/

boatyardblues · 12/06/2018 14:31

Whether that’s using a sheet to cover their lower half while you examine their abdomen right down to the basics of not laughing at something you hear or see. If you can’t put your own feelings aside when doing the job, and always put the needs of your patient first then you need to a new job.

I had an EMCS with ds1 and I still vividly remember 2 young female theatre nurses/assistants pointing and giggling at something the other side of the sheet across my abdomen. I have zero idea what was so funny, whether it was my badly dry shaved pubes (thanks midwife!), my stretch marks or whether I’d crapped myself, as I had been given an epidural block and was numb, naked and prone, but DS1 is 12 and that scene regularly pops into my head when I think about the night he was born. I rarely think about the lovely obstetrician or anaesthetist, but I do think about how vulnerable I felt and how humiliating that experience was. I have zero respect for any HCP that doesn’t show the utmost respect for their patient’s needs and wellbeing.

FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 14:30

Great to get your view Poppyred85.

It has sort of moved on to the idea that there is a fundamental conflict of interest between the reality of being a transwoman (where validation of your womanhood is essential for good mental health) and some situations which tacitly ask the patient or client for this validation.

OP posts:
Bowlofbabelfish · 12/06/2018 14:28

Must. Absolutely must. And it must be enshrined in good clinical practice.

Baroquehavoc · 12/06/2018 14:27

In the case of the OPs post though, the patients comfort should come before the ego of a trans HCP.

Should or must? Because the way some TRA are talking, they want to remove women's ability to refuse treatment from a TIM. We instead have to rely on TIM doing the right thing.

FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 14:24

I would hope that any trans woman or trans man working in a healthcare setting would have the humility to accept this. It is called professionalism.

Natluc, what do you think about my post at 13.33 which rejects the idea that this has anything to do with individual trans people and their professionalsm or otherwise?

And also, however much you might hope that what you have said is the case, it has already been proven not to be so.

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/inews.co.uk/news/health/nhs-woman-transgender-nurse-smear-test/amp/

OP posts:
Poppyred85 · 12/06/2018 14:19

I’m still on page 3 so sorry if things have moved on.
I’m a doctor. I always ask all of my patients if they are comfortable for me to examine them before doing any intimate examination and always offer a chaperone, whether the patient is male or female. As far as I am concerned if a patient does not want me to examine them then I don’t. That’s it. It is their right to choose. It makes no difference whether it’s because I’m a woman, wear glasses, have long hair or whatever. It is their right to choose who does what to intimate parts of their body. Yes, in an emergency situation it may not be posssible, but for routine care it is. As a student I remember one of the hardest things to get over was asking patients to take their clothes off. It’s such an intimate thing to do and puts the examiner in such a position of power. We are at out most vulnerable in these situations. Another element of examination drummed into us was about maintaining a patient’s dignity at all times. Whether that’s using a sheet to cover their lower half while you examine their abdomen right down to the basics of not laughing at something you hear or see. If you can’t put your own feelings aside when doing the job, and always put the needs of your patient first then you need to a new job.

BronwenFrideswide · 12/06/2018 14:09

I am sure someone will argue against it Fortunate, the very idea that women can ask and receive anything is anathema to some.

The analogies we have been treated to from the TWAW side to support their cause have become more and more ridiculous and, frankly, desperate. I thought we'd hit the bottom of the barrel with the 'styles of canine urination' but then along came the absurd 'obese woman at Pilates' and I heard a distinct scraping sound.

The analogies referencing black women are just downright offensive.

NatLuc · 12/06/2018 13:57

I know this post was quite a few pages ago, but I kind of liked it:

MrsTerryPratchett - And on the issue of gay HCPs. Mine is a lesbian. I know because she very very unsubtly dropped it into the conversation before she booked my smear. I assume she does this so homophobes can opt out. Because patient comfort is more important to her than affirmation.

I don't think it is unreasonable for a woman to specifically request a HCP that is not a transwoman for something as intimate as a smear test.

In the same way that if I was having a breast exam, I would very much prefer a woman (or trans woman) to perform the breast exam on me. It is not about validation (for me) to be seen by a woman, it is about not having a man touching my breasts. I would prefer that someone who understands having breasts does the exam (if that makes sense?). Before anyone picks apart my usage of the word 'man', I am distinguishing between man and male.

In the case of the OPs post though, the patients comfort should come before the ego of a trans HCP. I would hope that any trans woman or trans man working in a healthcare setting would have the humility to accept this. It is called professionalism. There is no harm in being trained to perform the test, but accept that not everyone will want you to perform it and equally, IMO, in this instance and others relating to it, trans status should be disclosed.

Side note... Is this possibly my most concise post ever?? Shock

FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 13:51

Thanks MipMipMip.

I wonder if anyone is going to argue against this now and how they might do that?

OP posts:
FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 13:50

That sounds like very good practice Bowlofbabelfish.

OP posts:
Bowlofbabelfish · 12/06/2018 13:46

To take pressure off the woman, this should be something that’s asked of her well in advance, or perhaps even added to her file? When booking a smear for example, the person should ask ‘do you require a woman to perform this?’ Or when you register as a patient someone asks you - when we call your for smears, do you require a female HCP? It should also be made clear that even if a woman ticks no, she still has the right to refuse at any point

I have been asked this previously at a practice which had a male nurse, and I think it’s a good option - it also allows the surgery to plan and allocate time.

MipMipMip · 12/06/2018 13:36

Perfect Fortune.

MipMipMip · 12/06/2018 13:35

Hotdog I agree with you about transmen/non bianary, provided you can see they are actually female. But I would imagine they wouldn't want to do it as they would then not get their affirmation. Unless you objected in which case they shouldn't be doing it.... if they are good nurses they won't make a big thing about presenting as male - I wouldn't want anyone swaggering round as a stereotypical male as I want very small careful movements down there!

Babel I believe the reference to transmen was as they were born female.

Lazy I know you didn't ask me but as far as I'm concerned men have the right to ask for a male to do an exam and should absolutely get one. I would imagine they would be more likely to object to a trans woman doing it than women would to a trans man though.

FortunateCookie · 12/06/2018 13:33

Ok how about this.

There are some situations where the needs of women must be paramount, for example when she is reviving medical care and has requested a female HCP, or when she is a client at a rape crisis centre. Faced with a transwoman in these situations, the woman may feel under pressure to accept the care of the transwoman despite being uncomfortable or distressed, due to a fear of offending or a fear of being perceived as bigoted. This has nothing to do with the transwoman’s professionalism.

In order not to compromise the care of a woman in these situations, and in order to recognise that this is not about any individual tramswoman, it is about the patient, a blanket single sex exemption policy should be used.

That’s not very well written but hopefully explains the concept roughly.

OP posts:
PermissionToSpeakSir · 12/06/2018 13:28

Yy

Swipe left for the next trending thread