Where do we draw the trans line....?

I am guessing that Twitter account is a bit busy reporting all of our nasty posts. Or did that disappear up its own fundament too?

Bored now!

Work seems more appealing, somehow!

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination

"You are a bullying misogynist. Trans identified males with GRC are biologically male"

Hate speech and again intended to cause distress and upset

Also a personal attack and mumsnet allow this kind of behaviour, personal attacks against other members get punished but not against the trans community

I have reported this

Hey TerfsUp

*when a man does it it's rape when a woman forces sex upon a man or another woman it isn't

That's a breech of human rights, international law and at a minimum is discrimination against gender*

Sorry, did you really say you were an expert in law?

Stop @ ing me! It's rally bloody annoying. You are needlessly filling up my in box (if that ain't triggering snurggggh )

I can read my name in bold thanks!

And you are wrong. Wrong, wrong wrongeddy wrong!

I know! And it was just starting to get good.

Looks like we'll have to wait until tomorrow for the next instalment...

As you were.

I can't say I've ever used them myself, are they for the 'new modern woman'?

Oh, no! Wax disks are gender inclusive. Report yourself!

Hey, truscum! Nice to see you. Always good to see / hear the voice of sanity.

Bowl, if only. A bit like Little Jack Horner I reached into my handbag for my pass and came out with it, dripping in fresh marmalade. The guard said "erm, that's ok." So then I legged it to the ladies' (hope that term isn't too triggering) to wash my hand.

Thankfully, I was only on the panel and didn't have to present. I'm still scarred by the memory.

@CuriousaboutSamphire when a man does it it's rape when a woman forces sex upon a man or another woman it isn't

That's a breech of human rights, international law and at a minimum is discrimination against gender

But it still ain't rape!

Apologies, I may have been on the Germaine Greer thread for too long. I seem have forgotten whether I am....

No. I don't think you can say that these days! Arthur and Martha have been placed beyond the Pale, I suspect!

A woman in England who assaulted another woman with a strap on would be convicted of sexual assault. Not rape.

Under English law, the crime of rape requires a penis.

Actually not true. There is no doubt about sex. Rather there is a recognition that circumstances matter and that rape centres occasionally need a certain amount of discretion based on appearance. That is very different

That's not true. The exemption is ONLY there because a biological male might cause extra distress. Which of course a rape counsellor wouldn't wish to do, surely?

Ah! No, I think twice in one day might be pushing my luck

I’m finding it concerning that there are so many people with GRC’s popping up all over the internet, with seemingly not even the tenuous grasp on reality.

Have they changed how they are obtained already?

I did pay for extra therapy but do they not still make sure that you understand the realities of what the future holds?

All these people stropping about, screaming abuse and threatening suicide (no, I am not downplaying suicide at all. But it is being used like a weapon currently and it is extremely irresponsible to do so) because strangers won’t accept them for what they want to be.

Did they not go through this with you?

Did you style it out, TERFsup?

I have a beautiful mental image of you cooly dipping a knife into your handbag and marmalading a fresh crumpet whilst professionally and seamlessly explaining Something Very Technical to a panel of assembled experts...

TerfsUp Please be assured my days of running are well and truly over. The days of going arse over tit are too, at my age the best I can muster is base over apex.

I will take very seriously your advice re wax disks. I can't say I've ever used them myself, are they for the 'new modern woman'?

I just wonder what Paddington would have made of all this.

I can report you, if you like, Curious. Or you could try posting a message in this thread to MN, asking them to delete your post.

Your pass in a safe place - sorry about the missing word.

This thread has taken a turn for the weird. But that's ok because I like weird.

Oh! Did I spend too long actually reading that article?

Slowcoach the Tortoise, that's me.

Oh! Did I just call myself a tortoise? Maybe I should report myself, that must be an insult, mustn't it?

@Bowlofbabelfish

You are incorrect. In English law, a penis is required for rape. A woman can be convicted of rape if she is an accessory (eg holding down the victim.) however she has not ‘done the rape’ - she is convicted as basically an accessory.

A woman donning a strap on would be convicted of sexual assault - not rape.

That's wrong it's not treating everyone equally under the law which is a violation of your human rights and such law that was passed was not by the will of the people alive today

I can confirm that Santa and the Easter bunny are fictional.

WUT