Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

It's Serious

62 replies

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 00:25

It has occurred to me tonight that the situation is genuinely serious.

I am/was a bit naive.

This post is about that it's really gone beyond stomping, laughing, giggling,

It's serious.

Kids are being operated upon.

For liking pink.

Kids are being poisoned with hormones.

For getting embarrassed about their growing breasts.

This is a call to... I don't know

A call to harms

My name is Georgina Toye

And I denounce this trans shit.

I thank

1 Magdalena berns

2 miranda Yardley

3 mumsnet feminist chat

4 my dad

Love and peace

OP posts:
RatRolyPoly · 30/05/2018 11:34

I can see that if you truly believed kids were being operated on simply for liking pink you would indeed think this was very serious. Anybody would.

I mean they aren't, actually.

So if that's the basis of your outrage, perhaps you might want to look into that a bit more. It might not be quite what you think.

...in fact it's so concerning to me that you might actually believe that rather than simply sensationalising you position that I want to say it again:

Kids are not being operated on for the mere fact of liking pink

Kids are not being prescribed hormones for the bare feeling of embarrassment

Maybe have a bit more humility in the face of our country's leading medical professionals in the field; if it seems nonsensical that specialist doctors would be operating on children for such spurious reasons, and that this would be upheld by the legal infrastructure of our first world nation and under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, well if it seems nonsensical it probably is nonsense.

LARLARLAND · 30/05/2018 11:24

Posters discuss other topics on this forum and so may wish to remain anonymous. I don't think it's particularly nice to suddenly decide that you are OK in outing yourself and then assume that everybody else should do the same.

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 11:11

Yes I'm afraid I was Puuurfect.

I apologise wholeheartedly for any offence I caused. I certainly wouldn't want any harm to come to anyone.

I was completely unaware that people's careers are at stake, but have just been reading about Rebecca RC. I've only been aware a few weeks, and although I know some things I have large areas of ignorance.

I do think though, that if those of us who feel able to do so go public that that is a good thing. I've not much to lose career wise. I'll just have to wait for them to turn up with their barbed wire encased baseball bats.

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 30/05/2018 11:02

This thread was referenced in James Kirkup's article 'Fear & Loathing Grips the Gender Debate'
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3204901-ffs-flagged-at-work-for-gender-critical-views

(extract)
"Other stories in this area involve women who speak out using their own names getting abusive messages at home and at work. In both the public and private sectors, being accused of transphobic bigotry is no small matter, and even many people who know they are doing nothing more than asking questions about an issue of public interest feel reluctant to risk being tarnished with such accusations, no matter how baseless they may be. (For real-world examples of this, see Mumsnet: this thread is just the latest to pop up while I was writing this. There are too many others.)"
blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/03/fear-and-loathing-grips-the-gender-debate/

Kyanite · 30/05/2018 10:54

It is serious and I don't like having to walk on egg shells.

It's a horrible feeling when you are silenced in groups that you used to enjoy posting in...I wasn't allowed to post about where the money was coming from or concerns of Psychologists regarding children. Nope, stick to the Party line, no delving deeper allowed. Accept everything at face value or else.

SporadicSpartacus · 30/05/2018 10:02

It’s a chat board. Seems like a reasonable post.

Yeah, it is serious - am also finding less giggle mileage in laughing at stupid gender activist stuff online, because it’s harming us. Not the words as such; the ideology they represent and the things people do in the real world as a result.

I don’t like being anonymous either. I do some limited gender criticalling under my real name, but unfortunately I can readily envisage getting the sack for hurting people’s feelings (I’m a contractor in a very ‘woke’ work environment). And then there’s the personal safety concerns - we have an as yet unconfirmed but apparently unprovoked assault on a GC vlogger in Edinburgh this week, and someone convicted of assaulting another GC woman last month.

I’m going to be cowardly and secretive here because it’s what I need to do to keep employed and safe.

AssignedPuuurfectAtBirth · 30/05/2018 08:40

Were you on the Wine last night OP?

Asking women to pst their names is foolish and dangerous. And I don't think MN allows it either

WhatTheWaterShowedMe · 30/05/2018 07:30

Don’t ask women to out themselves on this thread. It’s extremely dangerous is every conceivable way.

Noqont · 30/05/2018 02:18

Up to you. Your choice.

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 02:18

Anyway no one has to name themselves. I am though. Stop telling me not to.

OP posts:
Terfulike · 30/05/2018 02:17

No I didn't actually realise that this was a secret society no.

OP posts:
Noqont · 30/05/2018 02:15

Yes of course it's scary that people can't out themselves. But the reasons have been discussed over many threads. You already know this.

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 02:12

I don't really understand. I didn't come here for anonymity I came for people who would understand my point of view.

i understand if you darent out yourself. But that's scary really.

OP posts:
Pratchet · 30/05/2018 02:04

Op it is serious. That's why women who post here anonymously are probably doing other stuff, quietly, in real life that has their name on it. There's no point taking an extra risk here. However I applaud your bravery. Twitter had its own Spartacus moment with people posting names and pictures. It's not for me though.

Noqont · 30/05/2018 01:59

Tbf I supported Corbyn in the past too. Until I knew what he was really like.

LighthouseSouth · 30/05/2018 01:57

OP I wasn't asking you to apologise, just wondered if that was you

When you say "no way" what do you mean?

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:52

I'm not going to apologise for supporting Corbyn in the past either.

OP posts:
Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:48

The suffragettes were not anonymous.

OP posts:
Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:46

No way.

OP posts:
LighthouseSouth · 30/05/2018 01:43

OP that's a great idea in theory but in practice people have lost their jobs etc

I am not anonymous talking to politicians, they can have my name

But I can't post my name here unless you want the whole family reliant on a food bank. Many posters will be in that position. Also at risk of violence.

I'm guessing that s you on Twitter posting in support of Corbyn about 3 years ago? I'd get your name deleted from here.

Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:38

The suffragettes weren't anonymous and neither should we be

OP posts:
Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:36

Posie seems ok

OP posts:
Terfulike · 30/05/2018 01:35

No way

OP posts:
NameChangedForThisQ · 30/05/2018 01:30

You're right it's super serious. So super serious that it's best we keep our anonymity. People are being targeted. I'd get this thread removed if I were you.

PencilsInSpace · 30/05/2018 01:26

No I won't. I come here to be anonymous. You shouldn't be challenging women to out themselves here.

Swipe left for the next trending thread