(ignoring Nicholas)
Woah! Hang on.
So according to the January article, everyone working at the pond is well-versed in trans issues and trained, so trans-identifying men who would like to swim in the female pond are OK, whenever they say they are men.
But today, for Sweary G, Amy and I think another, even though they're self-Iding as males, the sex-based laws were invoked?
It's almost as if males are more vocal, and get heard when they complain about manginas in their pool?.
PS: if you['re new to this debate and happened to click on this thread wondering what the fuss is all about: -- be it pools, toilets, schmesh, mesh, many of us here on this board are just simply saying 'female' needs to be defined - whatever your space that's important to you to be penis-free,, be it toilets, smear tests, sex-based data re. discrimination practices, your child breaking stereotypical boundaries, lesbians being told they're transphobic for not acceptng 'lady dicks, ie penises' We need more of you to see what's going on right now.
You're probably like I was - 'live and let live'. Many of these trans activists don't want 'live and let live'. They want 'in' to your spaces.
Not because they are like you.
Because they want to be validated by you. To get off on being you.