Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Guess how I got suspended from the Labour Party?

811 replies

IAmDavidLewis · 22/05/2018 23:17

Well, one of the weirdest days in my life concluded with me receiving a letter informing me of my immediate suspension from the Labour Party. They believe I may have breached the rules by subverting the intention of All Women Shortlists, Women’s Officers or minimum quotas for women. Unfortunately, this does mean that my political ambitions are on hold for a while. I shall of course be continuing to self-identify as a woman every Wednesday, as that is my gender identity...

I have to say a huge thanks to @namechangeah for all her help, guidance and, more importantly, proof-reading! I wouldn’t have gotten to this point without it. I’d also like to thank everyone for their support today. I hope this has helped a bit.

And the Telegraph called me an “activist”! Achievement unlocked Grin

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
IAmDavidLewis · 23/05/2018 10:28

yawn stretch mumblemumblesomethingboutselfid

Actually I mixed it up this morning by self-identifying as I put the bath mat down. Variety is the spice of life!

@Pratchet The sum total of my self-identification to my CLP was saying “I self-identify as a woman”. The Party policy, as I understood it at the time, needed no further qualification and, indeed, none was asked for. I would have at least expected to sit down with the LGBT Officer to discuss the situation.

@CrustyCob Mother Nature gets all the credit for my beard highlights!

@ConfessionsOfATeenageDramaQueen The letter can be summarised as “we think you’ve been naughty, there’ll be an investigation, we think we need to take a break (it’s totally you, not us) and we’ll be in touch”.

@hackmum Micky-taking is in the eye of the beholder Wink. I self-identified because the Party said I could. I was serious about it from that point of view. My statement of identity was made with a straight face * ; if people find it humorous, then I’m okay with that.

@AlisonCHaynes From when my alarm clock goes off until midnight. It’s strictly observed, otherwise it’d just be chaos.

@merrymouse I’ll go for a walk and enjoy the weather. I shall also be wearing suitably womanly jeans and tee-shirt.

  • This sentence was also written with a straight face.
OP posts:
LangCleg · 23/05/2018 10:25

The Labour Party are just such great entertainment this year.

They are. That said, even if I wasn't particularly exercised by the self-ID issue, as a rational voter I would look at them and think JFC, if they can't even manage this, how are they going to run the whole fucking country? I wouldn't vote for this level of rank incompetence under any circumstances.

Voters are laughing at them. This is not good.

Ereshkigal · 23/05/2018 10:24

Can someone link to this thread on the GN thread?

ToeToToe · 23/05/2018 10:22

Absinthe, could you link to the thread? I never go on Gransnet.

Ereshkigal · 23/05/2018 10:20

Sarah gives away the game that Sarah expects all these males and many more to immediately apply to become legally female. Despite all assurances that it only affects a small number of people.

OldEnglishSheepDog · 23/05/2018 10:20

Thanks David. But forgive me for feeling a tiny bit depressed that it's taken a male voice to really force this issue into the wide world.

Bowlofbabelfish · 23/05/2018 10:20

My money is on prison time, especially if you have previous.

Am I allowed to mention Ian Huntley here?

EmpressOfSpartacus · 23/05/2018 10:19

I am wondering, if legal self-id comes in, would you be willing to make a false statutory declaration and become legally female. My fellow MNers including at least one self-identified lawyer think nothing would happen to you. My money is on prison time, especially if you have previous.

But there are plenty of prominent transwomen without GRCs at the moment, SarahAR. They're not legally female but still expect to be recognised as such. Are you saying that after legal self-ID comes in, any prominent transwomen who don't make this statutory declaration must be recognised as men? And if a biological male walks into a women's changing room, how are the women in there meant to know whether they've made the statutory declaration or not?

MsMcWoodle · 23/05/2018 10:18

Thanks for that David. Makes me absurdly happy when I get proof that NAMALT.
I don't know if David wants to take it further, but I think it's now up to us to push this forward. Labour have acted so quickly because they want it hushed up.
Any remaining Labour members out there who can make sure that this is discussed?

FesteringCarbuncle · 23/05/2018 10:18

A bio woman who does not identify as a woman would not be allowed to take a woman's officer place in the LP
I would be exempt because I do not identify as a woman

Flomper · 23/05/2018 10:17

I have a young family member who is on the Labour Exec and also had no idea - I've sent him this link

Bowlofbabelfish · 23/05/2018 10:16

They will just need to show that you were not sincere in your claim to have a female gender identity. Given the Spectator article and this thread, that won't be hard.

What is a female gender identity? I know I am physically female - I’m pregnant which is rather a giveaway. But since gender and sex are now disconnected how can anyone tell me what my gender identity IS?

It depends solely on feelings, according to the stonewall definition. If David feels he is a female gender identity then he has a female gender identity according to that definition.

If we are going to try to ascribe motive to that gender identity then things become particularly fun and I really hope this will be explored as an issue. Because I could accuse an individual of having a sexual motive, a nefarious motive, a frivolous motive or any motive at all that I choose - and how can anyone objectively defend that? I could say ‘you are just identifying as a woman to get housed in female prison estate’ and how could I be proven wrong?

I do hope David gets his (or her on wednesdays) day in court on this one. And makes them explain WHY they think his intent was trivial.

Let’s shine a light on all this and get people to talk about it.

AbsintheFriends · 23/05/2018 10:15

There's currently a thread on Gransnet about this and it's astonishing how many people still don't have the faintest idea what's going on (and think David is posing a threat to women.)

Just goes to show how important it is that the media cover this issue. THANK YOU David, for helping that to happen.

Flomper · 23/05/2018 10:15

@kyanite

but there are plenty of non gender conforming people like David eg Pips Buncewho identify as both men and women on different days and seem to be perfectly accepted for doing so. Would he/she not be allowed to join the LB or run for office? Surely that's transphobic:

www.fnlondon.com/articles/mistranslated-i-split-my-time-as-pippa-and-philip-20171002

Ereshkigal · 23/05/2018 10:15

The Labour Party are just such great entertainment this year.

They really are.

merrymouse · 23/05/2018 10:14

It would need to be a full time and permanent transition, looking at the legislation.

Do you mean Labour policies or UK legislation? Labour policies don't seem to follow legislation.

Ereshkigal · 23/05/2018 10:14

I am wondering, if legal self-id comes in, would you be willing to make a false statutory declaration and become legally female. My fellow MNers including at least one self-identified lawyer think nothing would happen to you. My money is on prison time, especially if you have previous.

i am wondering what you possibly feel you have to add to a feminist board, given your support of this I'll thought out misogynistic policy and zeal for punishing dissenters. I have a good idea.

If David hadn't announced himself, no one would be any the wiser and he would probably be Basingstoke CLP Women's Officer tonight. People see that. They're not stupid. James and David have merely highlighted how jawdroppingly stupid self ID is in all its forms. But yes he has made a sacrifice and many women appreciate it. I look forward to hearing about his suspension interview when he hopefully can make them look even more sinister and stupid.

Pratchet · 23/05/2018 10:14

MW is gender critical - I bet that's why the show did it. Remember when he refused to apologise.

Popchyk · 23/05/2018 10:10

Well done, David.

Labour have very clearly done a complete reverse ferret on this already. But they probably don't actually realise it yet.

They've gone from "where you have self-identified as a woman, then you are treated as a woman" to immediate suspension of a self-identified woman and "established safeguards, selection procedures and disciplinary measures" in just a couple of hours.

The Labour Party are just such great entertainment this year.

Italiangreyhound · 23/05/2018 10:09

Thank you David. Flowers

Destinysdaughter · 23/05/2018 10:08

So many pp totally missing the point about this!

twitter.com/5wrightstuff/status/999182677721960448?s=21

Guess how I got suspended from the Labour Party?
Kyanite · 23/05/2018 10:06

It would need to be a full time and permanent transition, looking at the legislation.

Maybe not making any outward changes but claiming to be full time trans would have fitted their requirements.

merrymouse · 23/05/2018 10:05

Why would be it be less valid to self identify as a gender critical woman?

Newspeak · 23/05/2018 10:05

Whilst I congratulate your efforts David a sincere thank you does nobody else find it sad that it has taken a man to highlight this in mainstream media. 300 women leave the Labour Party who cares ...man gets suspended it's all over the tv!

Cocolepew · 23/05/2018 10:04

Thank you David.
Enjoy your womaning today