Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Transwoman complains that The Handmaid's Tale should include them...

186 replies

Destinysdaughter · 10/05/2018 15:06

"For most ­women, Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale is terrifying and heart-wrenching. The show’s portrayal of a world that is dehumanizing, spiteful, and disgustingly violent toward womanhood feels only a few steps removed from today’s reality. Yet unlike most women, I have found it hard to actually identify into a world where I, as a transgender woman, would already be dead.

The Handmaid’s Tale is set in Gilead, a near-future society where the political fallout of a worldwide infertility crisis and nuclear war led to a nonspecified religious sect gaining political control of America. In this society, fertile women are both venerated and subjugated. They become "handmaids" - a farmed resource, banned from reading and free movement, and subjected to ritualized rape and abuse. Any nonfertile women seen in the show are either torturing the handmaids or serve as housekeepers, as wives, or in other stereotypically domestic roles.

Under the new religious regime, people showing LGBT tendencies, such as having same-sex relationships, are immediately killed as “gender traitors” or sent to a nuclear wasteland to work until they die from radiation poisoning. The only exceptions are the handmaids, whose fertility is precious, and therefore they are protected from the death penalty. Yet this doesn’t stop them from being punished in horrific ways.

It’s not shocking that trans people aren’t represented in this world. Unlike many of our cisgender queer counterparts, transgender people who have started transitioning may find it very hard to go back into the closet to protect ourselves. We are sometimes very visibly transgender due to old-fashioned gender stereotypes that a society like Gilead heavily leans into. We trans people would quickly be branded “gender traitors.”

Even the fertility that protects other queer women in The Handmaid’s Tale may be out of reach for transgender people. Many trans people, especially trans women like myself, become sterile when they take hormones or have gender-confirmation surgery. Even more horrifying, in many countries around the world like Greece, Belgium, and Finland, trans people have to prove they are sterile before they can even change their gender markers. France only just outlawed this practice as inhumane last year.

With all this in mind, it becomes hard for me to identify within the world of The Handmaid’s Tale. How can I feel June’s terror at her situation when I know I would never face it myself? I can sympathize but not empathize with so many of the show's stories. This feeling of being left out can sometimes hurt, especially given the cultural significance that The Handmaid’s Tale has come to represent for a lot of women under the Trump administration.

That’s not to say that I demand trans representation in The Handmaid’s Tale like I do from other TV shows. The Handmaid’s Tale represents an important conversation we need to have about women’s place in the world. With Donald Trump’s attacks on women’s health organizations like Planned Parenthood, women’s reproductive health is very much at stake. It’s a crucial fight that I as a woman without a uterus don’t have the right to suppress. While I am a woman and will always fight for inclusion in women’s spaces, there are battles that cis women face that trans women don’t, and there are battles that cis women don’t face that trans women do. Yet we are all still women. We (should) all stand together to fight for and with each other.

The trans community’s exclusion from the futuristic narrative of The Handmaid’s Tale is understandable. It just becomes emblematic of the daily fears that I face. Every time I hear about the trans military ban, the Department of Education rescinding protections for trans students, a transgender bathroom bill being voted on, or another conservative rally screaming out, “There are only two genders!” I'm reminded that I and trans people like me would likely be the first ones to die if Gilead ever comes to pass.

Yet maybe The Handmaid’s Tale should address this. The series often presents flashbacks showing how Gilead came to be. Perhaps a trans person’s struggles could appear there. Or back in the future world of Gilead, what if a character identified as transgender in this world? How would they hide or suppress it? Or what if there was a “passing” infertile trans woman who desperately had to hide her trans identity from the government? Or a trans man still able to carry babies forced to be a handmaid despite being a man? Adding trans people to the narrative could complicate the story in new and interesting ways that draw attention to not only the oppression of all trans people, but all genders (#ImAvailableforaWritersRoomJob).

I’m preparing to binge every episode of The Handmaid’s Tale. The show’s lack of transgender characters, whether intentional or unintentional, brings up a lot of questions about what the future may hold for the trans community in a dystopian world. Even if a real Gilead comes to pass - and I don't make it through the first act - I still want to know how it ends. I'm just saddened that I may not get to join the fight."

OP posts:
SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 10/05/2018 17:35

In the real Handmaid's Tale, transmen and how they identify would clearly hold no weight at all - any more than a handmaid who identified as, y'know, not a breeding machine but a mother who wanted her child to be with her. They'd be handmaids or dead.

boatyardblues · 10/05/2018 17:34

Just in case this hasn’t already been said...

Digested read version: Biology matters! Shock

Although this of zero surprise to women.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 10/05/2018 17:33

I suspect what writers like this want is a lot more characters like Sophia Bursett in OITNB. The take-home points there are OF COURSE Sophia is a woman, and only people with a grudge or an axe to grind suggest otherwise. Sophia's presence in a woman's prison is utterly fine - indeed, Sophia's better at being a lady than the ladies, she is a hairdresser! - and it's the nasty new regime's first priority that Sophia isn't allowed the drugs to stay feminine. Very nice and clear.

BeyondParody · 10/05/2018 17:29

Freias, well they killed the gay men but not the lesbian women, so it's plausible that they'd kill any kind of trans male while making trans females handmaids.

Hmm... I'd be interested in watching that storyline too.

thebewilderness · 10/05/2018 17:23

Jessie Earl, for reasons unknown to me, wants everyone to know that while they very much want to be a screenwriter they are incapable of empathizing with anyone but transgender identified males.
Not a brilliant career move but guaranteed to be published in the Advocate.

rocketpocket · 10/05/2018 17:19

Oh yeah. I'm always doing this. Lord of the Rings is good and all but what if, as well as his struggles with The One Ring, Frodo was also battling the demons of being trapped in the wrong body? To spice it up a bit. What if in Marley And Me the dog was actually replaced with a transgendered person? I'm not a dog myself, therefore I can't sympathise with (spoiler alert) the death of one. I know Mary Poppins is pretty old. Perhaps in the new one they could focus more on how transgender people are actually a thing instead of all that nannying and singing nonsense that is the primary focus of the original?

AssignedPuuurfectAtBirth · 10/05/2018 17:17

Until you posted the source, I thought it was someone taking the piss

Still think so, tbh

zzzzz · 10/05/2018 17:11

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Destinysdaughter · 10/05/2018 17:06

Of course it's not my own opinion! I added the link a few posts down.

OP posts:
TalkingintheDark · 10/05/2018 17:06

That actually made me laugh out loud at the sheer bonkers narcissism of it. Phenomenal.

FreiasBathtub · 10/05/2018 17:00

Or a trans man still able to carry babies forced to be a handmaid despite being a man?

I might actually be interested in that storyline. It fits much more obviously with Attwood's overall thrust (ha!) about control of women's reproductive systems and, if handled right, it could add even more richness to the world she's created (e.g. if you could get round the fact that 'gender traitors' have all already been killed, as PP say).

Shame it only gets one sentence in this article. Shame The Advocate didn't commission a trans man to write something instead. Shame, but not a surprise.

SpareRibFem · 10/05/2018 17:00

Sigh I really thought it had to be a parody as the only other feasible option was author had extreme NPD

zzzzz · 10/05/2018 16:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

R0wantrees · 10/05/2018 16:56

SimonBridges Its an article posted on 'Avocate' yesterday.

SimonBridges · 10/05/2018 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BeyondParody · 10/05/2018 16:47

Hang on, there was no reference to the mn fwr board posters either... Ffs, we are all being literally erased! Angry

Mogleflop · 10/05/2018 16:44

Hah. Can you imagine the fucking backlash if she'd written in a new line saying "oh yes and all the trans people are murdered too"?

Also I don't think she specifically mentioned autistic people did she? Where's my personal fictional holocaust ending then Margaret?

Racecardriver · 10/05/2018 16:40

It does. They were all hanged in the first season along with the homosexuals, abortionists and, priests. I would have thought that was pretty obvious. What other possible role could they have in that narrative?

LangCleg · 10/05/2018 16:38

There'd possibly be room for them in Oryx and Crake...

Barabajagal · 10/05/2018 16:31

I’d love to hear what Margaret Atwood thinks about such nonsense.

Rainydaydog · 10/05/2018 16:26

I don't know why this person thinks the story doesn't include them when all the gender traitors were murdered during the revolution. Surely that is a way of including them? Yes in this horrible future all known LGBT people were murdered and the remaining women were treated as slaves.

LikeAZombie · 10/05/2018 16:22

This is the crux of the matter for me. Womanhood is a biological fact not an identity that can be opted in and out of.
Can women and girls identify their way out of routine sexual intimidation, harassment and rape?
Can poor girls identify their way out of period poverty?
Can women and girls from certain cultures identify their way out of fgm?
Can any of us identity our way out of suffering from pmt pcos pnd women's cancers, infertility miscarriage traumatic births loss of earning when we are lucky enough to become mothers, being left holding the baby. The list of things I would love to be able to rid from my identity is long. But science. And socialisation.
Any Trans woman In gilead would be daft not to use that luxury and just opt out, back to the safety of being a man. After all most of them still have their dicks anyway

UpstartCrow · 10/05/2018 16:20

The show’s portrayal of a world that is dehumanizing, spiteful, and disgustingly violent toward womanhood feels only a few steps removed from today’s reality

Its not removed from reality at all. Everything in The Handmaid's Tale is happening to women - actual, live women, not 'womanhood' - somewhere in the world.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 10/05/2018 16:19

I suspect Atwood thought again about whether she really wanted an all-white Gilead and decided that to make that part of the aim of the coup would be to introduce too much in the TV series - are watching a show to terrify us about white supremacists, or about women's reproductive rights? I imagine she concluded, reasonably enough, that whilst in 1985 it had made sense that the new regime would ship out non-whites, she didn't want to go that way now.

I certainly wouldn't bracket a 'black lobby' with the trans lobby. I don't see the inclusion of non-white actors as being 'disappointing' or pandering to political correctness, and actually I don't think it's to do with inclusivity so much as it is about making the narrative centred on women, which the book clearly is even though it does suggest that black Americans have been deported.

An all-white dystopia would be a problematic thing to get us to empathise with - a dystopia in which women's bodies have become entirely commodity no matter what their race is much more engaging.

bluescreen · 10/05/2018 16:17

There is probably fanfic that would cover it.Transfic.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.