Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Where does the right to a private life end?

33 replies

IdiotsInCharge · 06/05/2018 16:56

Apparently we aren’t supposed to talk about Susie Green and their child (now adult) as they have a right to a private life.

If we are discussing what they have said/endorsed in main stream media then how is that a breach of the ‘private life’?

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2235781/Jackie-Green-Transgender-beauty-queen-praises-amazing-family-ahead-BBC-documentary.html#ixzz5Ejlvk4bz

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00w09yg

OP posts:
PermissionToSpeakSir · 06/05/2018 18:09

I think we need to take aggressive action against these people (probably advised by Stephen Whittle) who are abusing privacy laws.

Did you see Maria Mac's attacker try to pull that stunt in court? Saying they were worried about being 'outed'.

This 'be able to do what the fuck you want even if it is illegal and not have it discussed public because you claim to be 'trans'' privacy law needs to be abolished.

LizzieSiddal · 06/05/2018 18:02

I fully expect MNHQ have taken legal advice about this issue.

If Posie can be questioned under caution, for discussing this child, MN could also find themselves in trouble. They cannot risk a legal case, they need to protect themselves and I don’t blame them.

QueenOfQuacks · 06/05/2018 17:54

Apparently not @IdiotsInCharge

See the MNHQ post on the thread about posieparker...

Original poster
IdiotsInCharge · 06/05/2018 17:53

So presumably we can talk about Susie’s child Jamie/Jackie’s gentials as the child is now at least 25 years old and have put the information
into the public sphere?

OP posts:
Sarahconnor1 · 06/05/2018 17:11

If it's already in the public domain then it's no longer private. You can't demand infirmation you put out are then not talked about especially if you are using that information to gain publicity and power

QueenOfQuacks · 06/05/2018 17:10

Once you've put information about yourself in the public domain you can fuck off trying to tell people they can't talk about it or have an opinion on it.

Amalfimamma · 06/05/2018 17:07

If anyone has put personal information in the public domain it is immoral to then demand it not be talked about.

Censorship is it's correct name.

Terfulike · 06/05/2018 17:06

Totally agree with this thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread