Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Motherhood and equality, what does Eutopia look like?

186 replies

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 04:47

I accept that I'm incredibly slow to the party, but a few threads and specific posts that I've read have really highlighted to me that motherhood lies at the heart of feminism. Whilst I wouldn't say the battle has been completely won for women prechildren, statistics around earnings and education do look promising, however it seems all of this drops off a cliff once kids arrive. I think this is related to lots of factors, some of which are within women's control (eg choosing to be a SAHM) and some not (eg not being able to afford the childcare required to work).

In this context I have been pondering what equality looks like in a post children world. Personally I think it would involve society viewing an individual's career as a lifespan with expected peaks and troughs. It is madness that the peak decades for building your career are also the decades when women are fertile. I think there should be a greater acceptance that when someone has kids it is natural and normal to want to spend time with them and this probably will not be compatible with working long hours and doing lots of travel for work. This should all be a standard expectation of men and women with young families so things like flexible working should be encouraged and time spent at home should be viewed as a pause on a career, not a termination of a career. The big pay off for such an approach would be that as kids grow and parents are able to refocus on their careers, nobody would be too heavily penalised for gaps in CVs or a few years on the career slow track. This would make it much easier for women and men to close any gaps that may have opened up. It also doesn't ignore the reality that parents with young kids simply do not have the flexibility and time that childfree employees have to devote to their career without effectively never seeing their children which is unacceptable to many.

Is my view of equality post children Eutopia in line with what others think? I can see a shed load of challenges to making mine work, but it doesn't seem beyond the realms of possibility.

OP posts:
drwitch · 02/05/2018 10:11

offred - Wine Grin cheers

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:10

I didn’t do a biscuit, has one appeared? Confused

TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 10:09

Maybe you continue to keep the SPL system but then offer the father 3-6 months fully paid leave in addition, exclusively for his use. That would allow many more variations to be possible. Current uptake of SPL is very low (even 9m / 3m) because the father is then on statutory pay and this is unaffordable for many couples.

Also the fact that your exact role is only protected for 26 weeks mean that it's much easier for employers to side line women who take more than 6 months off (which although it's right for me, is too short for many women) and so you often don't even get your job back, not exactly motivational!

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:09

It was applause not a slow hand clap!

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:08

I totally agree.

I also think it is OK for nursery to be about mothers.

I do think some of the benefits to children only exist because of how we have structured the world though. They are not necessarily inherent benefits IMO but benefits that arise as a consequence of other structural issues.

drwitch · 02/05/2018 10:08

offred why the slow hand clap and the biscuit ? Have you read the book?

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 10:06

And yes agree you don't have to justify the use of nurseries etc, but it is a real consideration for lots of parents.

OP posts:
Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 10:05

OffredI accept that a nursery adding value or not may be controversial and I think it is pretty hard to prove. From a common sense perspective though, I think when children get a certain age you can definitely see how they could benefit from aspects of that setting such as the socialisation etc. I'm not saying that they couldn't get the same from being at home, but a good nursery/preschool could definitely meet these needs too.

OP posts:
Offred · 02/05/2018 10:01

I don’t think we need to justify nursery by saying ‘it is so much better for the child’ in short.

Offred · 02/05/2018 09:59

I have some issues re studies about nursery and value to education. My understanding is that it is not at all proven that the measured educational ‘benefits’ of nursery education are in any way lasting and they are used to prop up a. Standardised testing which requires learning by rote (anathema to critical analysis), b. Prejudice against low income/young mothers and c. The low value status of caring/high value status of waged work.

I do think it is clear that high quality childcare from 3 is probably not harmful though and that high quality childcare from younger may not be either but I am highly sceptical re ‘benefits to the child of nursery’ though at the same time irritated by the idea that is implied by that that all that is important is the mother prioritising the child. IMO it is about balancing needs of children and carers.

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 09:52

Grumpy Yes, I agree generally. I think the problem with shared parental leave is it implies the original leave is split rather than extending the leave. As Offred suggested previously in the thread , maybe the answer lies more in extending the leave. Mother gets first year, father gets the second. I believe after two or three years the evidence for nurseries/preschool adding value to children increases so it would tie in nicely with that.

OP posts:
Offred · 02/05/2018 09:48

The utopia In women on the edge of time has no nuclear families and no real sense of motherhood

👏🏻

Offred · 02/05/2018 09:48

Men (as a class) do not want to ask or comprehensively consider the question ‘why is waged work important?’

It is a question that women as a class ask and answer all the time as part of their existence.

TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 09:47

" I absolutely think that any woman who wants to share leave should be encouraged to do so but I don't like the thought of women being pressured to do so when they've been through such a life altering experience that just isn't the same for a man."

But why does a man's leave have to be at the expense of the woman's? In Sweden they have a few months which are use it or lose it for the dad. This could be added on to the end of standard maternity leave, if you still think 9 months is too short for women. Men have to be "forced" to participate, otherwise (generally) they just won't.

I actually think the wide spread expectation that most women will take 12 months off (while men do not) is damaging to our prospects at work and perpetuates employer bias against women. I'd like to see a lot more variety in what couples do. And many more men taking time out.
I was questioned on baby plans as soon as I turned 30 and got married. Would that be happening if there was a broader variety of leave patterns between men and women?

drwitch · 02/05/2018 09:46

The utopia In women on the edge of time has no nuclear families and no real sense of motherhood

QuarksandLeptons · 02/05/2018 09:45

Brilliant thread. Placemarking so I can read later. Thanks OP. I’m so in agreement with you.

Offred · 02/05/2018 09:45

*our change our understanding 🤦🏻‍♀️

Offred · 02/05/2018 09:44

The current panic about unemployment and zero hours and low wages etc is again, IMO, a flawed analysis which automatically assumes that waged work is a. The only means of survival/contribution/stimulation etc and b. Losing waged work of various kinds is in itself a problem for humanity.

The problem is not so much the loss of waged work or technology replacing jobs but the failure to move away from the waged work model or change or understanding of contribution to society as technology replaces jobs.

This is again patriarchy as much as capitalism, if not more IMO, as waged work is a major tool of the oppression of women.

womanhuman · 02/05/2018 09:43

Without that change, men will continue to shrug their shoulders and say 'well what can you do? I would have gone down to 4 days a week but you know you just can't in my kind of job'.

In our case, we both work in industries/positions where you are likely to be re-organised or downsized at any point. So in our case, we valued the security of one of us not being on the easily-dispensable track more than we valued DH doing the childcare on a Monday. It wasn’t about status or pay rise, it was about keeping roof over family’s head. (A pressure he feels much more keenly than I do, because Man.)

It was absolutely nothing to do with him shrugging shoulders and letting me pick up the slack.

TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 09:40

"The real question is how do you make men value childcare as much as they value that next promotion/pay rise/shiny new job? "

I don't think you can while women simply continue to do it for them (not blaming women for this as it's not a free choice unfortunately but a vicious cycle).

You need structural incentives from government and for corporations to care more about losing female talent... which apparently they do now but it sounds like it's mostly lip service.

You also need more women to question why men should get a free pass and stop accepting that short term financial consequences mean they should take the entire career hit (obviously not possible for everyone). Men should be challenged on this point more often. Child raising isn't just a mother's responsibility as it's necessary for the whole of society.

Having said that - it's very hard to keep your self esteem and desire for your job / ambition alive while everyone is telling you that your priorities will "naturally" change and your employer is already writing you off before you've even started maternity leave...

Offred · 02/05/2018 09:38

Jobs, which are only one aspect of work, are changing. We are at or almost at the tipping point.

There will no longer be such thing as a ‘career’ as it has been typically understood. There will no longer be set hours which are ‘working hours’ for jobs.

It is vital that planning takes account of this and that analysis of how people contribute to society and how people survive in society expands from a waged work model.

Women absolutely must not continue to be the victims of this situation as the evaporation of waged work as a means to provide the basics needed for survival and contribution continues.

BeyondParody · 02/05/2018 09:30

I'd think there should be much more part time work for everyone. Why accept that x amount of people have to be out of work, while other people work themselves into the ground?

That'd probably involve some sort of universal income as well. And some building of more social housing.

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 09:27

Offred I totally believe it is a flaw in the class analysis positioning (wrongly) positioning children as the enemy of women and more broadly caring work (no matter who performs it) as low status and debasing.
Totally agree with this and the rest of your post..

Hide I can see the logic in that approach, but it sits uncomfortably with me. I understand in America maternity leave is classified as a type of sick leave. I am struggling to articulate why I find this awkward. Maybe it's because it seems women are saddled with all the associated burdens of being the only ones that can be pregnant, give birth and breastfeed, but then women are also being asked to give up what some would see as a privilege of time with their babies and share it with a man who has no such burdens. I absolutely think that any woman who wants to share leave should be encouraged to do so but I don't like the thought of women being pressured to do so when they've been through such a life altering experience that just isn't the same for a man.

OP posts:
Offred · 02/05/2018 09:21

There is no real need for bearing/caring to be structurally unsatisfying or isolating. But it is. This is one of the reasons men don’t want to do it.

As individuals our individual personality traits and differences in interest (men or women) may mean that we will always find caring/bearing unsatisfying but this is different to how stigmatised, isolating and abnormal the conditions of motherhood have become IMO.

DisturblinglyOrangeScrambleEgg · 02/05/2018 09:18

Without that change, men will continue to shrug their shoulders and say 'well what can you do? I would have gone down to 4 days a week but you know you just can't in my kind of job'.

Fuck me yes. A sore spot in my relationship is when I was looking to move out of freelancing and back into a normal job, had got a few excellent offers, and had chosen one, and asked DP to use his big company's flexi-time policy to start at 10am so he could do drop offs.

Bear in mind also, that by then the traffic would have been better, so he'd also have had a shorter commute. And, that if he was tired, he'd not leave until 8:30 some days anyway, so he was definitely going to be late to work when it suited him

Not possible apparently, a flat 'no' - the flexi-time policy was just for show, and senior management wasn't expected to actually use it.

The only reason this wasn't a huge problem was that a month later I landed a huge freelance project that paid even better, and meant I could make my own hours (and I found an excellent childminder)

Swipe left for the next trending thread