Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Motherhood and equality, what does Eutopia look like?

186 replies

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 04:47

I accept that I'm incredibly slow to the party, but a few threads and specific posts that I've read have really highlighted to me that motherhood lies at the heart of feminism. Whilst I wouldn't say the battle has been completely won for women prechildren, statistics around earnings and education do look promising, however it seems all of this drops off a cliff once kids arrive. I think this is related to lots of factors, some of which are within women's control (eg choosing to be a SAHM) and some not (eg not being able to afford the childcare required to work).

In this context I have been pondering what equality looks like in a post children world. Personally I think it would involve society viewing an individual's career as a lifespan with expected peaks and troughs. It is madness that the peak decades for building your career are also the decades when women are fertile. I think there should be a greater acceptance that when someone has kids it is natural and normal to want to spend time with them and this probably will not be compatible with working long hours and doing lots of travel for work. This should all be a standard expectation of men and women with young families so things like flexible working should be encouraged and time spent at home should be viewed as a pause on a career, not a termination of a career. The big pay off for such an approach would be that as kids grow and parents are able to refocus on their careers, nobody would be too heavily penalised for gaps in CVs or a few years on the career slow track. This would make it much easier for women and men to close any gaps that may have opened up. It also doesn't ignore the reality that parents with young kids simply do not have the flexibility and time that childfree employees have to devote to their career without effectively never seeing their children which is unacceptable to many.

Is my view of equality post children Eutopia in line with what others think? I can see a shed load of challenges to making mine work, but it doesn't seem beyond the realms of possibility.

OP posts:
TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 10:48

I mean the expectation that I'll need/want to step back from my career for a bit. Not helping.

TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 10:46

That as "default" expectation doesn't help women or equality.

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 10:45

Yes the problem with outsourcing all of the domestic and caring work is that you need to earn enough to pay someone else to do it all for you. People on an average wage realistically will struggle to finance outsourcing without offering those you are outsourcing work to a very low wage. When you think that most of us would rank our kids as the most important people in our lives, it is counterintuitive for us to be paying a pittance to those caring for them. Realistically, other than those who have found a real vocation childcare, you are going to be attracting a lot of people into these kinds of roles that don't have a vast array of better paid options. Is this what we want for our children?

OP posts:
TheGrumpySquirrel · 02/05/2018 10:45

I agree (that FT childcare from 2weeks old etc isn't the solution) but at least those workers get paid! Offred is spot on.. deeply uncomfortable that childcare is monetised only when "women don't do it"...

Think employers could get used to more people having career breaks if many more men and childfree people did it too. Of course having kids has an impact but I'd like it not to be assumed that I'll want to step back please.

drwitch · 02/05/2018 10:41

In the Daughters of Egalia (satire where sex roles are reversed), the menwim (who have all childcare responsibilities) have to take the babies across town to the wom's workplace for every feed. In this world because women are the ones that create life, they are they only ones that can truly add value (create stuff and ideas). The masculists in this society talk a lot about how their liberation is constrained by their biological role as fathers, read it if you haven't already it does make you think

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:38

Yy 53rd

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:38

This aspect of patriarchal control; waged work to attain the means to survive and thrive and selective monetisation based on cultural values IS going to die and it will either need to be artificially propped up OR thrown out.

Patriarchy is obviously invested in propping it up IMO.

53rdWay · 02/05/2018 10:37

I also worry that making trade-offs with the system that work to help well-paid women succeed in corporate jobs just displaces the problem.

If we can only succeed by outsourcing the tasks that used to fall to us - childcare, housework - then we’re relying on a large group of people to be the nannies and the nursery workers and the cleaners. And guess who’s doing that? Not the men.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:35

‘How is attaining the means to survive and progress going to be affected by technology?’

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:34

I think this gives us an opportunity to consider things like; ‘is financial recompense related to seniority the best way?’ ‘Is waged work the main contribution a human can make to society?’ ‘What is the purpose of waged work?’ ‘What is important about waged work?’ Etc etc

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:30

I think the whole concept of ‘career progression’ is changing TBH.

Even now the vast majority of waged workers do not have ‘a career’ (in the sense of training in a discipline, working in said discipline and climbing the ladder bit by bit) and for my children, I expect anyway, the primary issue will be about the ability to translate skills across more diverse areas of waged work and for training to be across a lifetime rather than at the start of ‘a career’.

53rdWay · 02/05/2018 10:30

As for breastfeeding meaning the Mum HAS to take the baby, well that’s irrelevant for the many formula feeders and is maybe a decision to be made in conjunction with who takes leave first.

But then it becomes “well either you can breastfeed or you can advance in your career, pick one” and that’s also not what we need.

Right now we have a system where ‘work’ clashes with our reproductive biology as women. We are the ones that get pregnant and give birth lactate - not all of us do any/all of those, but we’re still the only ones who do. Tinkering round the edges of that to let us opt out of bits this biology - “well we don’t have to lactate, we can choose formula” - isn’t fixing the underlying problem. We need a system that isn’t hostile to our biology to begin with.

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 10:27

Controversially, I don't think that having children should have zero impact on your career. I think it should be possible to take time out but it should be treated as any other career break e.g. for travel, study etc. It seems logical to me that this might slow down career progression.

Agree completely. I think an acknowledgement of this would take a lot of pressure off parents who feel like they should be giving their all to their careers and their families at the same time. We are all human and only have so much time and energy. There is nothing wrong with focusing on different things in different seasons of your life.

OP posts:
silverpenguin · 02/05/2018 10:26

And I definitely don't think Eutopia is everyone working full time and putting their children in childcare full time.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:25

And even writing that I can see that thinking about ‘not doing’ childcare is so politicised culturally along sex based lines that the idea of ‘not doing’ childcare for women is deeply uncomfortable when associated with men ‘not doing’.

silverpenguin · 02/05/2018 10:24

Eutopia would be men and women taking an equal hit when children come along.

Controversially, I don't think that having children should have zero impact on your career. I think it should be possible to take time out but it should be treated as any other career break e.g. for travel, study etc. It seems logical to me that this might slow down career progression.

I think the issue is the cultural expectation that it will always be the woman who goes part time, takes a career break, does pick up and drop off, funds childcare. I'd like to see parenting responsibilities shared more equally and no default expectation that it's primarily down to the mother.

I'd also like to see employers being more flexible around working hours but not just for parents, I think it would be beneficial to many people e.g. those with health issues who can't work full-time, those caring for elderly parents etc.

Bumpitybumper · 02/05/2018 10:23

ALittleAubergine I believe that access to affordable, good quality childcare is at the heart of this..

I both agree and disagree with this statement (very decisive I know). I agree for obvious reasons that you have stated that without good, affordable childcare available then some people (usually women) are forces out of the workforce. I disagree partly because sometimes I think childcare is seen as the golden bullet to keeping two parents in work as opposed to changing working practices to enable a child's parents to spend more time with them. I know nurseries open 12 hours a day, breakfast clubs and after school clubs are all relied heavily on by parents to facilitate two careers, but I do wonder if this is what utopia looks like for both parents and children. My instinct is that it isn't...

OP posts:
Offred · 02/05/2018 10:23

It is the same for the majority of caring work. This is inextricably linked to low pay for waged caring work in a cyclical way.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:21

When fathers don’t do childcare it is not monetised except in rare cases of absent mothers. The vast majority of the time when fathers don’t do childcare mothers do it by default and then become dependent on/constrained by patriarchal systems.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:19

The cost of childcare I agree is a massive issue which is making women dependent (and therefore controlled) by patriarchy (husbands/partners/fathers even if absent or the partriarchal state).

That things have financial implications under current form of capitalism is the means through which patriarchy imposes control.

The monetising of childcare only when mothers don’t do it I think is something I think about a LOT!

ALittleAubergine · 02/05/2018 10:16

Also paternity leave needs a change, statutory pay is not enough.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:16

I particularly like it when someone says something that I think cuts through the ‘tinkering around the edges’ and gets to the heart of the issue, which is what I saw that post as... basically ‘ok but if we cut through it doing away with the cultural understanding of motherhood and the expectation that it is something for individual women to perform individually is surely it?’

ALittleAubergine · 02/05/2018 10:15

I believe that access to affordable, good quality childcare is at the heart of this. Also better financial support for families in general. Many women stay at home or sacrifice their career in other ways because the financial hit of childcare is too much.

Offred · 02/05/2018 10:13

Stupid emojis!!! Ha ha ha

drwitch · 02/05/2018 10:12

yes there is something that looks like a "nice" biscuit under the hands!

Swipe left for the next trending thread