Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Freedom of Speech - A statement by the Chair of the University's Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Group

32 replies

R0wantrees · 26/04/2018 21:14

Published 27.2.18
www.bris.ac.uk/news/2018/february/freedom-of-speech.html
The University of Bristol is re-affirming its commitment to freedom of speech and to the rights of all our students and staff to discuss difficult and sensitive topics, and to being a place where all feel safe, welcomed and respected, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, disability or social background.

The University has been made aware of the controversy surrounding a recent meeting in Bristol, organised by the group known as “A Woman’s Place” and chaired by one of our students. The stated purpose of the event was to discuss the implications of proposed changes in the law which would mean a person’s gender could be determined by self-identification alone, and concerns about what this might mean for single sex environments such as social and sports facilities, hospital wards, changing rooms and toilets.

An open letter was posted on social media calling for the event to be banned, on the basis that the discussion would be founded on hatred and distrust of transgender people. Some 200 people are believed to have signed up to this letter, including some of our students and staff. There were many related comments on social media, some of these describing the event - and anyone involved in its organisation - as by definition transphobic with some using abusive and intimidating language. We understand that in the end the event took place without incident.

While this event was not affiliated with or hosted by the University, it presents an opportune time to affirm our commitment to freedom of speech and to the rights of all our students and staff to discuss difficult and sensitive topics. Universities are places of research and learning, where debate and dissent are not only permitted but expected, and where controversial and even offensive ideas may be put forward, listened to and challenged. Intellectual freedom is fundamental to our mission and values. Our freedom of speech policy underlines the vital importance of our right, as members of a free and democratic society, to speak openly without fear of censorship or limitation, provided that this right is exercised responsibly, within the law, and with respect for others who may have differing views. We do not condone attempts to silence discussion before it has even taken place or the use of stereotyping or threatening language to prevent debate.

We also take this opportunity to affirm our equally strong commitment to making our University a place where all feel safe, welcomed and respected, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, disability or social background. We believe that calls for this event to be banned were largely founded on the sincere desire to show support and solidarity for transgender people in our society and in our university community. We regret however that this desire has been expressed by some in a manner which may have caused others to fear that their own right to meet and speak freely about matters of concern to them is not protected by the University.

Professor Nishan Canagarajah
Pro-Vice Chancellor Research & Enterprise
Chair of the University's Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Group
I have reposted this for clarity

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 26/04/2018 21:22

I asked for it to be taken down for clarity and have reposted.
Apologies all.

OP posts:
2rebecca · 26/04/2018 21:22

Agree as the "recent" meeting wasn't before Feb

R0wantrees · 26/04/2018 21:21

Link to thread describing 'disciplinary meetings with two students who tried to ban radical feminists fom campus in response to WPUK meeting in Bristol'
twitter.com/FeministRoar/status/989560579223322624

OP posts:
Datun · 26/04/2018 21:21

Actually, I think it is referring to a previous meeting? Not the one where they sat on the stairs. Because that was we need to talk.

Confused.

Datun · 26/04/2018 21:19

That exact statement was just deleted from another thread because the date is February.

However, I think the date must be wrong. It's too accurate a statement.

2rebecca · 26/04/2018 21:19

Where did the other thread go? I switched from widget to computer to copy and paste a link to it and it had vanished. It looked fairly inoccuous to me

TERFragetteCity · 26/04/2018 21:18

Crikey. Finally.