Translation of word salad please

We should write the 10 rules of transactivism. Which would be basically the same but more Orwellian.
They do bear a rather shocking similarity. I think we should.

The communicative intent is: transwomen are women, justified by kind of linked phrases and buzz words the writer doesn't understand enough to use in a coherent sentence. Any teacher would return that covered in red pen.

I keep thinking of the poor homeless and addicted and desperate in Deptford having this stuff lectured at them by earnest students, who sincerely believe they're communicating some wonderful message of enlightenment.

It's utter tosh.

Feminism is about women.

There are feminists that focus on what you could term as "branches" of feminism - for example BAME, specific cultures/religions, socio and economic factors and clearly there can be an "intersection" between these because women can be "categorised" by a number of different factors.

However, the one think Feminism never intersects with is men.

This is why TRA's are so keen to push the trans women are women rhetoric.

If people believe this then you can co-opt womanhood and leave it linguistically indefensible by altering the definition and thus key principles of feminism.

PomoBot there appears to be malfunctioning. I do basically speak their language (thanks, uni sociology lectures) and even so the first paragraph is nonsense.

We should write the 10 rules of transactivism. Which would be basically the same but more Orwellian.

What it means is that they have co-opted the concept of Crenshaw's intersectionality, that examined the oppression of Black women, in order to claim that Feminism must be useful to men or it is worthless. That is the 5th rule of misogyny.

Disappearing sex categories fails to recognise structuresof oppression and is the absolute opposite of the internationally that she advocates.

You're right, she's talking nonsense.

If biological sex becomes diluted so it's meaningless, how will people choose mates and procreate?

It also begs the question that if women's biological sex becomes meaningless, how will women's biology be accommodated in terms of health?

To be honest, she sounds daft.

Also none of that has anything to with Int human rights laws.

That's what I thought. Complete non sequitur.

Does it mean that if you mess with gender you upset the hierarchy where women are at the bottom and men at the top?

If so, truly messing with gender would do that.

Men doing half the housework, half the child rearing, half the taking care of the elderly. Women's biology having absolutely zero impact on the way they are treated.

That's messing with gender.

Clothes, make up, etc, denoting sex does nothing to mess with gender.

And pretending biology doesn't exist is pointless, and doesn't address the reasons why we have gender in the first place.

I can translate this bit for you:

"Feminism is intersectional, or it isn't feminism."

It means

"Feminism will include men, or else I'll get called a TERF"

Imherefornow Looking at that thread I'm not entirely convinced they are posting in good faith.

@ooffydarls
i don't see sex'= sexism

‏*@beccalamjig*
No.
"I don't see gender" = cis privilege

Nah im with you imhere

Made sense for the first few posts then it was word soup

They are a Libfem who retweets Owen Jones.

Their 'feminism' doesn't include lesbians. Their point (whatever it was) is moot.

...''& is the basis of international human rights law.''

No it isnt. The basis of international human rights law is the argument that your rights end where mine begin, which is not supported by identity over biologically.
Also, that human rights are unconditional - and that is the actual basis for intersectionality as described by Dr Crenshaw.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimberl%C3%A9_Williams_Crenshaw
''Crenshaw often refers to the case DeGraffenreid v. General Motors in writing, interviews, and lectures. In DeGraffenreid v. General Motors, a group of African American women argued they were receiving compound discrimination excluding them from employment opportunity. They contended that although women were eligible for office and secretarial jobs, in practice such positions only were offered to white women, barring African American women from seeking employment in the company. The courts weighed the allegations of race and gender discrimination separately, finding that the employment of African American male factory workers disproved racial discrimination, and the employment of white female office workers disproved gender discrimination. The court declined to consider compound discrimination, and dismissed the case.''

Are you missing off the end or the start? Despite the length it reads as though it is the begining or end of a thought.

"experessing diversity of race is fabulous too"

As Rachel Dolezal does iyswim.