An account which is named Dr Truefem is targeted harassment in itself.
Except twitter's report method doesn't have a comment feature in which you can explain this.
Which rather exploits this failing under the banner of humour or parody.
You can create an account, abusing and mocking someone which IS targeted harassment, but because you don't directly message someone, that's fine.
At the same time you can tweet things using humour to point out the absurdity of something and be jumped on for 'promoting hatred'.
In the end it comes down to the censor and what their political position is and who controls the platform, because such decisions are subjective and down to perspective rather than being a decision being made in the same way you would expect from a court of law in how it weights up the argument from both sides.
Because of this, the medium kills free speech, before things ever get to a court of law who has to legal power to rule fairly and impartially.
In other words twitter has in built partiality which favours those who are like those who are employed by twitter.
In terms of intersectionality, the system itself discourages it through the way it operates.
Not only that, it actually amplifies that bias in forcing those who don't share in those views off the platform.
It becomes a system of social control in its own right. Tools of social control are what authoritarians use.
This should be a concern to anyone who believes in democracy. Those who profess to be liberal but use this type of social control or celebrate when an organised campaign against an individual forces them off the platform, are not progressive nor liberal.
They just don't know it.
The worst bit is success on social media tips over into real life and affects actual political policy.
Its social distortion which in the long run will be harmful to wider society because of who is excluded from the conversation.
When people wake up to it, it will be too late. In fact, it already is.
The best you can do, is simply say not in my name and go down fighting.
Like every political revolution by authoritarians the first they go after are the educated liberals because they are the ones who pose the biggest threat to them by using critical thought and resisting propaganda.
And that is why its the feminists first. They are easy pickings. There is already a bad attitude to them and one that says 'oh well they deserve it for being demanding / mouthy'.
But they are just the first.
Right side of history? Perhaps people would like to know their history first before spouting such bollocks.
Don't worry, when you've stopped being useful, you'll be fair game too.