"There's a grey area with kids over the age of ten who should know right from wrong."
You what?
Have I read this right?
You believe that girls over the age of 10 should know "right from wrong" and there is a "grey area"???
I can tell you that in LAW there is no grey area, children under 13 are deemed incapable of consenting to sexual activity.
I can also tell you that in society in general there is no "grey area" - 13 maybe, possibly 12, but primary school age, especially not even the last year of primary school, no I do not believe that there is a "grey area" around fucking girls this young many of whom will not even have reached puberty.
Of course some poeple will claim there is a grey area, some judges will decide that "she looks older" is a good enough excuse even with an under 13, some people on the ground will decide to "turn a blind eye" and victim blame and all the rest of it as is seen in this case,
However to say that there is a grey area with over-10s is incorrect - and to put it on the victims that they are old enough to "know right from wrong" when they are victims of a crime is out of order.