So now there is a K (for Kink) in the LGBTQIACHKP+

Angrykittens-
What are you implying- that religion caused or is responsible for this? Do you actually think that?

And then let's protect "kink" as a sexual orientation and promote it, teach it in schools.
yes christianity was so bad, how dare a religion try and impose some sort of morality- this way is much better

Interesting how neatly religious homophobia dovetails with the "we're all deviants together, but like, in a cool way" attitude that's led to the ever expanding acronym.

Aah yes those monogamous biblical kings....

Yes we'll see how it's going, how wonderful all this sexuality without restraint is going...

True. If we could all just be properly religious, like King Solomon or Newt Gingrich, there would be none of this newfangled modern messing around with more than one partner.

Guardianlions- your post sums it up, why not add these things and celebrate them too... where is this going to stop now?
Where's the protection..

Religion has been replaced with hednonism- if it feels good, why not and with this attitude, -that individualistic pleasure is the most important thing, - where do you think we're heading?

Hairbod-
Since religion has been largely removed from society things will continue to go downhill- all types of things will now creep in because there's nothing to stop it.
i would say that religion promotes sex in a monogamous respectful relationship- but this has been thrown out in favour of a sexual free for all- with new additions all the time being normalised and celebrated- polyamorous, trans, kink- what next?
These are not conducive to human flourishing. They harm society, look at the harms of porn, trans agenda on children etc, they are harmful, but hey anything goes now.

Oh, for heaven's sake. This is getting ridiculous.

Hotel=hospital, though probably not hotel either I suppose.

That's the thing, if you're a fetishist many other people may think you're weird, but what does that have to do with being gay? It takes a certain lack of understanding of why gay men and lesbians felt like they needed a movement in the first place and what they were fighting for to think that fetishes should be part of the same "umbrella". Randoms not wanting you to do your puppy play at the dog park/DDLG stuff on the swing set in the park where their kids play isn't really the same kind of problem as not being able to be with your partner in the hotel when they're dying of AIDS in either kind or scale.

I think more young people are defining as asexual - as a reaction to hypersexualised, sadistic pornified culture. Young people who find it disgusting and unappealing assume they are asexual.
Keep it in - I reckon it protects people from coercion.

How about 'murderer', necrophiliac, cannibal? They are all just 'orientations' aren't they? And don't judge others for how they get off. If it brings boners or kills them - it's an identity and you can be proud and add those letters to your profile...

Why would people who don't want to have sex need to organise in any way?

I don't get it either. What human rights do they feel they are being denied? How would anyone actually know they were asexual unless they told people?

I'm sure more will follow. Result of a godless, hyper sexualised society where all things are to be "tolerated"

🙄

There is nothing inherently wrong with 'kink' or fetishes or things of that nature, as long as everyone involved is a fully consenting adult of course.

Sex doesn't have to be about a god fearing man pumping away into a god fearing woman until he comes and they male a baby. It can and should be enjoyable for everyone, every time and due to some people's preferences sometimes that involves things that not everyone is all about.

The objection here is the piggybacking of every fetish and sexual preference onto the LGB movement - a movement that came about in the first place because up until very recently in the UK, gay people did not have the same rights as straight people. Transgender people, pansexual people, 'kinky' people have the same human rights as everyone else in this country.

It's like me starting a political movement for people who don't like mashed potato.

Given the state of the other current political parties I'd vote for you

Never mind kink, it's the asexuals who confuse me. Why would people who don't want to have sex need to organise in any way? It's like me starting a political movement for people who don't like mashed potato.

I'm sure more will follow. Result of a godless, hyper sexualised society where all things are to be "tolerated"

What the hell is 2spirit???

What’s the C and the H for? Celibate?

Also, I honestly do think there’ll be a P for paedophile in there one day. Once we’ve all been forced to pretend that men are women, that’ll be next. The trans movement is laying the groundwork already with the transing of kids and the sexualisation of them.

What the fuck does 'friends and family' mean?

Also the appropriation of 'intersex' as a way of propping up the trans argument is just awful.

If 'minor attracted people' ever EVER makes it anywhere near the mainstream then I'm getting off this planet for sure.

I'm sticking with LGB, they are the only ones related to sexuality and so to have the others lumped in with it really pisses me off, and I won't be adding in all sorts of other ridiculous initials just to keep some tiny group of non sexuality related options happy! And as for using cis at all alongside the word woman, well you can just fuck right off!!