Just watched it and it wasn't as bad as I thought, because he does make the link between women's biology, patriarchy, male violence and women's oppression, and seems quite sincere about it.
He makes the mistake of showing a depiction of all those weird gender symbols and says 'all the sexes' when we know there are only two sexes - but I can forgive him, because these are treacherous waters to be navigating, so I am not surprised he is a bit confused.
Also the 'white feminism' thing is a load of bollocks. Feminism includes analysis of intersecting class oppression without falling down the rabbit hole of pomo bullshit, and the idea of 'white feminism' has really been an MRA effort to stir up misogyny and self-censorship within feminism to shut women up and let men in.
When Audre Lorde asked the white women to leave so the black women could discuss their particular experiences, the white women went willingly because they got the whole thing about intersecting oppression and the tendency of minority groups to get sidelined within movements. They didn't subscribe to this made up ideology of 'white feminism'.
Although Shane speaks of 'White Feminism' in that video, I think it sticks out as being a bit superficial (maybe his own 'white guilt') rather than the more radical feminist points he makes in the second half.