Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Taylor Swift positioned as Time Person of the Year?

111 replies

Squirrler · 06/12/2017 17:49

Moral courage can be found everywhere. There are stories everyday - large and small - of vulnerable people risking their jobs, their reputations, even their lives, to take a stand against abuses of power. If, to reflect the zeitgeist, Time wants to make it about women standing up to sexual abuse, who would argue against that.

But Taylor Swift? One of the most powerful people in modern music, with a personal fortune of millions... that's a choice for the front cover? What did she risk? What was on the line? A man grabbed her bottom and she won a dollar in court. And this is supposed to be inspiration for women to put their own jobs and reputations on the line?

Do me a favour.

I am not questioning the validity of Taylor’s experience or her story. What I have a problem with is what Taylor is being positioned as the face of a movement by being placed on this cover, because she won a lawsuit. She lost nothing when others have lost everything when they break silence, but don’t get visibility. Just look at Ke$ha, whose abuser was her record label boss. She took him to court and lost everything, including her career. She broke silence when there was zero room for it and got shamed into hiding. He even put a gag order on her. Why is she not on the cover?

Why is Tarana Burke not on this cover, when she’s been doing this work for 10 years? Yes, she is on the inside and gets to tell her story but she deserves to be on this cover, because if there is a face for the movement, hers is it.

What about, say, Terry Crews, who is a man who decided to break silence and that shit was major. In this culture of toxic masculinity, men speaking up about their victimhood is revolutionary.

www.awesomelyluvvie.com/2017/12/time-person-of-year-taylor-swift.html

OP posts:
Coconutspongexo · 06/12/2017 19:26

They’re recognising a lot more than 5 people btw:
Rose McGowan
Terry Crews
Alyssa Milano
Veronica Owusu
Gabrielle Eubank
Crystal Washington
Tarana Burke
Sandra Muller
Celeste Kidd
Jessica Cantlon
Sandra Pezqueda

To name a few, I really like this years choices.

Ereshkigal · 06/12/2017 19:25

I don't have a problem with Taylor Swift getting this. At least she's a real fucking woman, that's something!

Coconutspongexo · 06/12/2017 19:21

I think it’s that fact she was being sued and countsued the man who groped her for $1 I think she’s being recognised for speaking up in an industry that is known for sexual harassment/assault.

Nyx1 · 06/12/2017 19:14

OP "The most pertinent question is this: what did she risk? "

given how these industries work, her entire reputation. (no pun intended). Look at Kesha.

Nyx1 · 06/12/2017 19:13

OP, you know Taylor Swift didn't sue the guy? He sued her.

She did not ask for this publicity. And I do think it's very helpful that she spoke so bluntly in court.

I'm not clear if you are annoyed with her or Time's decision to put on the cover, but she is one of the people who has had to deal with this and hopefully this might act as a mental support, so to speak, to any young fans who might have to deal with the same thing.

Squirrler · 06/12/2017 18:24

Well... depends on how nuanced your view of 'empowering' is, I guess.

many white women have messaged me to tell me how “disappointed” they are about my stance. Apparently, I should not “shoot arrows internally” and critique Taylor. Internally?? What community do me and Taylor share, besides womanhood? These arrows are external AF. Taylor has never stood for anything I represent, or anyone who looks like me.

OP posts:
cricketqueen · 06/12/2017 18:15

Maybe because she has a fan base comprised mainly of teenage girls and she's showing them that it's not right for men to do these things. Also it's not just her she's one of many mentioned. I can't get angry about something that is about trying to empower women.

Squirrler · 06/12/2017 18:11

The most pertinent question is this: what did she risk? We're talking bravery here, right? What's so brave about a situation in which an extremely rich, famous and powerful person is counter-suing a less wealthy, less famous and less powerful person? What exactly are we applauding? No, not just applauding, but including as one of five faces on the front cover of Time Magazine. 20% of the whole deal.

This is just another extension of power we're talking about: her voice is one of the most prominent, and why? Because the nature of her story is so compelling? Hardly.

OP posts:
Butterymuffin · 06/12/2017 17:53

f, to reflect the zeitgeist, Time wants to make it about women standing up to sexual abuse, who would argue against that.

I'm even more puzzled by your post now, because that's what they were doing?

Butterymuffin · 06/12/2017 17:52

She's not the person, she's one of a group. To focus on her misrepresents that.

Bobbins43 · 06/12/2017 17:51

Terry Crews is one of the people photographed.