Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Let toys be toys - Foodbank wants to allocate Christmas gifts based on sex and age

59 replies

ShotsFired · 22/11/2017 06:58

This sounds pretty trivial in the scheme of things currently being discussed on here, but in the spirit of Broken Windows Theory....

My local Foodbank (Trussell affiliated)is organising a Christmas Parcel campaign for local children - basically fill up a small box of Christmas Day. They go on to specify that age and sex should be noted on the outside.

I have FB messaged them, and they have seen it, to point out that the sex marking, in particular, is unnecessary and plays to pointless stereotypes (let toys be toys). Not to mention that if they get a surplus of one sex, do children of the other miss out as it isn't for them? No response.

Am considering chasing by email, with a cc to Trussell to ask for their response/position on this. Am I just wasting my breath? If not, any tips?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
LassWiTheDelicateAir · 23/11/2017 12:30

When I contributed to these I usually picked items for "teenage boy" as being the demographic least likely to be picked by others.

I have replied with a second email to say I would be happy to buy him a coffee and continue the conversation to understand each other better, but no reply

Why should he reply?

You could have just picked items and marked them "suitable for boy or girl age[ ]"

ShotsFired · 23/11/2017 11:52

Glad to be so entertaining for them @MrsJayy! Let's hope they have the right number of boys and girls to match the boxes they are donated, otherwise some poor kid is going without.

Have a lovely day.

OP posts:
MrsJayy · 23/11/2017 11:47

You will also turn into a foodbank urban myth

MrsJayy · 23/11/2017 11:46

You know you are the laughing stock of the foodbank now don't you ?least when they are sorting through boxes and toys referrals they will be wondering if it is gender neutral

RedToothBrush · 23/11/2017 11:39

I've been asked to do this for charity.

I deliberately chose to give something that could be given to either a girl or boy without problem.

It also helps in the event that they have too many of one and not enough of the other.

ShotsFired · 23/11/2017 11:27

@wisedad no worries, here you go:

Let toys be toys - Foodbank wants to allocate Christmas gifts based on sex and age
OP posts:
ShotsFired · 23/11/2017 11:26

In the end I sent a very polite and friendly email asking whether the Foodbank would consider requesting neutral gift boxes, to help both the volunteers who need to allocate them (to an unknown mix of boy and girl recipients), and for the children receiving them.

I got a very aggressive reply in minutes, telling me that he could see my view was "strongly held", but basically to fuck off and then fuck off some more.

I have replied with a second email to say I would be happy to buy him a coffee and continue the conversation to understand each other better, but no reply.

As a pp said, I will "concentrate on making a difference where you can rather than spending effort where you can’t".

OP posts:
ArcheryAnnie · 22/11/2017 23:03

Bye!

WiseDad · 22/11/2017 21:39

. Again with the assertion without evidence. I am saying something grounded in both research of populations and the personal experience of many people posting on this thread as well as my own and that of many of my friends and family. After all this the best response that you come up with is to merely state I am an arrogant man who is "spouting shit". Somehow I feel this is more a reflection of you than me.

Now how do I delete this thread from the "I'm on" view so I don't have to reminded of your animosity to reason?

HerSymphonyAndSong · 22/11/2017 15:20

“Lord the arrogance of a man who calls himself “wise” and then spouts this shit.”

Totally stand by this

HerSymphonyAndSong · 22/11/2017 15:18

Hahaha ya wee dafty :D

WiseDad · 22/11/2017 14:34

@ Hersymphonyandsong. And you fail to provide evidence to refute my point in any way what so ever and resort to gender associated stereotyping. Do you do hypocrisy often?

Almahart · 22/11/2017 14:30

Nothing wrong with books but kids have access to them at school and I can tell you for sure that for my kids they fall into the same sort of catergory as clothes as a present.

One of them is not very interested at all, the other has very specific tastes. Other than for very small children I would say chances of getting a book right are low, although annuals/Ripleys books probably ok

DJBaggySmalls · 22/11/2017 14:12

Its a pity the box cant be labelled with an age range, colour and theme.

ArcheryAnnie · 22/11/2017 14:11

What the fuck's wrong with a book, Almahart? Books are often expensive so difficult to buy when you are on your uppers, there's loads of fun ones suitable for every age (so you'd put the age on the box), and kids like them.

user1495451339 · 22/11/2017 14:10

Difficult one, as a child I had all my brother's hand me down clothes and toys. I longed for dolls and pretty things so I would probably have considered a gender neutral toy quite boring!!!

BahHumbygge · 22/11/2017 14:07

I didn't imply that a girl would be happy with a pink saucepan set. it's about living in the world as it is vs how one would like it to be. When you're at the coalface, pragmatic choices come in. Now for us that would be guided towards donating gender neutral toys. But the charity will have the full gamut of toys to distribute and pragmatically a lot of young 7 year boys would be bemused by receiving such a heavily gendered present. Our contention should be further back in the supply chain/marketeers/educationalists etc, not with the children who have already had their taste in toys formed.

Almahart · 22/11/2017 13:53

Don't put bloody books in fgs.

Just pick what you think looks FUN and they will jiggle it abou anyway

museumum · 22/11/2017 13:51

It would be an improvement for them to request labels with an age range (not single age) and marked “boy” “girl” or “either”.

FizzyWaterAndElderflower · 22/11/2017 13:49

I doubt that most 8 year old boys would be pleased if they received a very pink doll.

Honestly I reckon that most 8 year old girls would feel the same.

But not forcing a disadvantaged boy to be grateful for a pink saucepan set/whatever on christmas morning

Disadvantaged girl though, best she learns her place early.

Patronising shite.

museumum · 22/11/2017 13:49

I’m 100% behind let tots be tots on a marketing and selling level. However if my boy really wants a car I’m not going to force him to have a jewellery making kit instead just to subvert stereotypes.
If I was asked to buy for an unknown 6yr old that might be their own Christmas gift then knowing their sex does give a better chance of it being something they are pleased with even if their likes are shaped by society.

Ttbb · 22/11/2017 13:40

surely this is about making children happy. I doubt that most 8 year old boys would be pleased if they received a very pink doll.

ArcheryAnnie · 22/11/2017 13:39

You know what? When you are poor you still have dreams, political opinions, all those pesky things. Girls and boys living in poor families should still have the freedom to choose what they like rather than what stupid gender norms say they should like. It's not only possible to be a feminist when you are poor, it's very bloody likely.

Maybe the answer is just to put in books rather than toys.

BahHumbygge · 22/11/2017 13:28

You're taking the fight to the wrong people, that should be with the manufacturers and retailers. It's fair enough though to point out that there should be an option to choose and label as such gender neutral toys. But not forcing a disadvantaged boy to be grateful for a pink saucepan set/whatever on christmas morning. Questioning genderisation of toys happens further back in the supply chain.

HerSymphonyAndSong · 22/11/2017 12:17

@Alexkate2468
The OP has explained how she has tried to help them out but has been turned down