Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Culture you inbibed as a kid that you find inappropriate for kids these days:

82 replies

Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 03:05

Posted the following on the normal chat board but I was wondering how the discussion might differ if it were over here:

Yesterday 01:33 Iwasjustabouttosaythat

DS (4yo) is loving the idea of time machines. I said to him and DP, "oh, we should watch Back to the Future together!" DP starts grimacing and saying not for a few years yet and giving me the "let's talk about that later" look. Only after discussing it later did I remember that the plot is (SPOILER ALERT) I need to go back in time to save my mother from being date-raped at the prom. Wow.

Then there's that delightful scene in License to Drive where the Coreys are taking sexual photos of a young Heather Graham while she's passed out from alcohol. Hilarious! confused

The Beatles are my favourite band but there's a lot of lyrics in there I don't want my kids hearing. The oft cited Run For Your Life is just one of many examples.

Is anyone else a bit shocked at the stuff we used to watch? I mean mostly in regard to sexism/sexual violence but all discussion welcome.

OP posts:
Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 12:38

Bertram, if you know a bit about John Lennon in his youth I think you'd agree that it's not a composition about some theoretical abuser, but was JL's personal feelings. He's been quite candid about being abusive towards women in the past (except for Paul McCartney they all have) and he openly thought threats and violence towards women were ok. That was normal in his background. And you can see these views in plenty of other songs (how creepy is No Reply?). He went on to become a much nicer person thankfully.

OP posts:
Elendon · 16/11/2017 12:26

Beauty and the Beast. My two daughters watched it, after insisting I buy it, and then asked me to throw it in the bin. It really is a lesson in Stockholm Syndrome.

metalmum15 · 16/11/2017 12:02

The Back to the future films are awesome, my teenage dd has watched them several times. I think they might be a bit complicated for a 4 year old though.

Btw, I've actually seen the Krankies live. Bet you're all jealous 😉

MarmiteAndPB · 16/11/2017 11:54

Fairfax - to be fair, it's still a bit iffy in the original timeline. George was in the tree because he was spying on her getting dressed in her bedroom. Something that he's apparently never confessed to in all their years of marriage, given the breakfast conversation at the beginning! So he's "rewarded" for spying by being nursed by Lorraine and marrying her. Of course, their marriage in the original timeline isn't a particularly happy one.

MarmiteAndPB · 16/11/2017 11:49

I think that on the commentary track for Back to the Future they mention that they had a hard time selling the script, because it wasn't raunchy enough for most studios (popular comedies at the time were more "adult" sexual humour like Porky's) and Disney, as the "family friendly" studio, felt that it was inappropriate because it had Marty's mum fancying and pursuing her own son!

Personally it's been a favourite of mine since childhood, but I'm not sure at what age I first saw it. But it's always been a PG not a U, so I can see that 4 might be too young?

I'm not sure about the sexual politics of the sexual assault. Biff is unambiguously the bad guy, and it's pretty clear that Lorraine is fighting against him and George is perceived as the "hero" by all the other students when he stops Biff. I'm not sure that's bad in itself. And as I child I think I read it as "Biff wants to kiss Lorraine, but she doesn't like him so she tries to stop him. It's ok for her to want to kiss someone she likes (Marty), but she can refuse someone she doesn't like and is helped when that happens". I don't think that's a bad message!

But on the other hand, Lorraine wanting to kiss Marty when he's clearly incredibly uncomfortable about it, and aggressively pursuing him, is not ok! And it's not great that Marty's plan to help George involves "fake" harassment, even if he couldn't go through with it in the end. It's implied that he'd be ok with acting out the part of a sexual assaulter in order to give George a chance to "come to the rescue". He's not comfortable with it, but it's ambiguous whether that's because of the assault itself or specifically because it's his mother.

BertramTheWalrus · 16/11/2017 11:25

Iwasjustabout if you say composing a song about a violent abuser is normalising (and I don't agree on this point) and seeing as normalising violence is problematic, then what does that entail? Should artists only focus on the positive aspects of life?

DJBaggySmalls · 16/11/2017 11:24

The sub plot in BTTF is how the geeky Dad cant stand up to the macho bully Biff. We watched it recently and I dont remember there being that much swearing in it. It didnt bother us but I thought they wouldnt be allowed to make that today.
You;re allowed to rape, stab and bludgeon women on screen but not say 'Oh God'.

averylongtimeago · 16/11/2017 11:16

The black and white minstrel show, Benny Hill, Till death do us Part, all dreadful.
Bernard Manning and other similar 'club' type comedians.

Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 11:09

Benny Hill is so bizarre. It's hard to believe that ever happened. 😂 It makes me think of The Goodies though. I loved that show so much when I was a kid. I named my toy dog Bill. I saw an Ep a few years ago and don't remember anything except the black face. Oh lord. I hope Kitten Kong is ok...

OP posts:
Gingernaut · 16/11/2017 10:46

Mind Your Language
Dick Emery
Another vote for Benny Hill
Man About the House
Bless This House

Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 10:42

Bertram, no one said glorifying. It's normalising. And yes, it should be discussed, like I said above.

OP posts:
Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 10:40

Lweji, you don't think a teenager from the 50s would be upset at all? I guess those girls were made of sterner stuff...

OP posts:
BertramTheWalrus · 16/11/2017 10:39

I really adore the Beatles (I really do) but I can't explain away lyrics like "you better run for your life if you can, little girl. If I catch you with another man that's the end, little girl".
I don't see these lyrics as glorifying violence. If my kids asked about them, I'd say they're about a violent man who would kill his girlfriend if she left him. I'd go on to explain that these things really do happen and how horrific they are. I'd see it as an occasion to talk about the horrors that happen in real life, instead of pretending they don't exist.

Lweji · 16/11/2017 10:20

She doesn't even seem bothered by the attack afterwards, like it's just a normal and expected part of being a woman.
It was set in 1955, so, yes.

Iwasjustabouttosaythat · 16/11/2017 10:16

I think my issue with BTTF is more that it's so casual. She doesn't even seem bothered by the attack afterwards, like it's just a normal and expected part of being a woman. Then they actually hire Biff! Her attempted rapist comes to work at their home! Oh that Biff. What a scallywag! Boys will be boys, eh? Just make sure the car is nice and shiny!

I really adore the Beatles (I really do) but I can't explain away lyrics like "you better run for your life if you can, little girl. If I catch you with another man that's the end, little girl". I would never want DDs thinking that's an acceptable way for men to think about women. Or that it's romantic for a man to be so horribly possessive.

Of course I think kids need to be exposed to the horrors of the world somewhat, but back when the Brothers Grimm were writing fairytales the world was a very different place. These days we should be teaching girls to value themselves, not think sexual assault and stalking is romantic as referred to by a few posters above.

Discussions will be had (of course my kids are going to see and hear these otherwise wonderful things with my encouragement at some point) but it's more that I just can't imagine stuff like this being made nowadays.

OP posts:
Lweji · 16/11/2017 08:48

Nothing wrong with Back to the Future.
You can explain the scene as unwanted physical contact to a 4 year old. It's not presented as normal or desirable, but as a bad thing.

FairfaxAikman · 16/11/2017 08:39

I actually think overall that Back to the Future is a fairly positive film.
Yes, there’s a very bad character who nearly does a very bad thing but not everyone in life is good.
George has been bullied for a long time by Biff, but it’s finally thanks to his love for Lorraine that he is able to stand up to him, when he could so easily have walked away instead.

It shows the value of standing up for what’s right in that after he does that he has a much more positive and successful future.

claraschu · 16/11/2017 08:38

Crumbs My kids read lots of fairy tales and watched Back to the Future, as well as loads of old movies. I think the whole idea of what is inappropriate at the moment is a bit off kilter.

busyboysmum · 16/11/2017 08:24

Benny Hill 😲😲😲

Crumbs1 · 16/11/2017 08:18

Fairy stories evolved to enable children to develop the emotional ability to cope with the horrors of real life. Read Bettelheims ‘The uses of enchantment’. It provides a fascinating insight.

Far from shielding our children from all the unpleasantness that is humanity, we should be helping them explore it in a safe and supportive environment. Hence nursery rhymes (and other fiction). They take the truly awful and help children develop the skills to cope with that knowledge. Boy in striped pyjamas comes to mind as a more modern story that does likewise by reducing the unparalleled horrors of the holocaust into a format that children can deal with given opportunity to discuss and contextualise.
Nothing wrong with Children having knowledge if it’s presented in an accessible way.

Datun · 16/11/2017 08:14

Almost every black and white film ever.

Gone with the Wind. Rhett rapes Scarlett and the next morning bang! she’s in love with him.

expotition · 16/11/2017 08:06

The Beano. Not sure what current ones are like but DP still has his old annuals and they are sexist, racist & crypto-homophobic.

claraschu · 16/11/2017 08:05

I don't think that my kids were hurt in any way by watching Back to the Future and listening to the Beatles, nor by reading Dr Dolittle (absolutely fantastic books, and I believe very anti-racist in philosophy, even though they come across as deeply racist in today's world).

Surely all fairy tales are inappropriate in today's world, with their sexist and classist overtones.

Religions also seem highly inappropriate to me- very very misogynistic.

notafish · 16/11/2017 08:04

The Krankies. Wtf was that about? That made me properly laugh out loud.

Panicattheschoolgate · 16/11/2017 07:56

When 2 become 1 by the spice girls all those tweens singing it. Confused I didn’t know what it was about.

Swipe left for the next trending thread