Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

'TERF' isn't just a slur, it's hate speech

35 replies

DonkeySkin · 22/09/2017 15:40

This article by Meghan Murphy explains how the anti-feminist term 'TERF' is being used, by men especially, to incite hatred and violence towards women.

www.feministcurrent.com/2017/09/21/terf-isnt-slur-hate-speech/

I've been thinking about what an effective propaganda tool 'TERF' has been in silencing and demonising women who criticise any aspect of the trans agenda, and how crucial it is that feminists expose both its true meaning and the hateful rhetoric that accompanies it.

Make no mistake, 'TERF' represents the most extreme misogyny in both conception and function.

Firstly, the phrase behind the acronym - 'trans-exclusionary radical feminist' - derives its power from the accusation that there is something unnatural and monstrous about women who 'exclude' men. It plays into the sexist notion that women are hateful for having boundaries: according to patriarchal logic, women are not to supposed to have anything for ourselves; everything we have is to be made available to men for their benefit. ‘TERF’ is an extreme manifestation of this patriarchal logic, implying that women should not even be permitted to distinguish ourselves as a separate, real category of persons, and that our ontological existence itself should be open for colonisation by males.

Secondly, it is not only a misogynistic slur but a lesbophobic one. If women are bigots for excluding males, it follows therefore that lesbians, who exclude men from the resources they most prize from women (sexual and reproductive function), would become open to charges of bigotry simply for being lesbians, and they have been, with organised campaigns against lesbian sexuality in the form of the ‘Cotton Ceiling’ workshops and vicious targeting of otherwise ‘trans inclusionary’ lesbians such as Youtuber Arielle Scarcella, merely for saying that they don’t want to interact sexually with male-bodied people.

Thirdly, the word itself is deliberately ugly, evoking its homonym ‘turf’, implying that the women so-labelled are ground to be trodden on, stomped and kicked. This is crucial to the term’s dehumanising intent. As Murphy points out, once a man has labeled a woman a ‘TERF’, he can then direct any sexual or violent threat towards her (or, as we’ve seen with the assault on Maria MacLachlan at Speaker’s Corner, actual violence), and take cover from the fact that, according to many leftists and liberal feminists, he hasn’t abused a woman, but rather righteously disciplined a ‘TERF’.

In light of the extreme misogynist abuse that ‘TERF’ encourages and enables, it was very upsetting to see the media, in the wake of the Speaker's Corner attack, refer to the assembled feminists using that term. In some cases (e.g., Pink News) this was deliberate, but in others, e.g., the Daily Mail, it seemed more a result of confusion and perhaps the genuine belief that this is what the feminists called themselves (I think the DM even referred to MacLachlan as ‘a member of TERF’). IMO this highlights the need for feminists to undertake a campaign of educating journalists and the general public about this slur and how it functions. Perhaps, next time the issue is in the news, we should undertake an email campaign to journalists and editors at major media outlets explaining how 'TERF' is a term that has been imposed on gender-critical feminists in order to demonise us, and that it is often accompanied with misogynist abuse and threats. This would also be a good opportunity to provide examples (e.g., screenshots or links to articles like the one above) of said misogynist abuse from transactivists and men in general, which helps to expose the misogyny of the movement itself. Lord knows, they are providing us with AMPLE evidence. Probably the simplest way to do it is to direct journalists to the website terfisaslur, which should open a few eyes to the real nature of trans activism.

And I also have to beg women here not to try to 'reclaim' it. Reclaiming slurs never works for women. Think about the way liberal feminists tried to reclaim 'slut' - this ill-conceived campaign did nothing to stop men from using slut to denigrate women. I guarantee that it did not stop a single abusive man from hurling 'slut' at a woman while he was beating her. Ironically, all it did was give men licence to use slut more freely.

Rather, we need to acknowledge the seriousness of this. ‘TERF’ is a term, now in widespread use amongst the left, that dehumanises women and justifies violence against us. That's the REASON it has been gleefully embraced by so many people, especially men. I know that many gender-critical feminists here and elsewhere like to use 'TERF' jokingly or ironically, and I understand the impulse towards that, but please be aware that this ultra-misogynist slur cannot be subverted or 'reclaimed’ - it can only be exposed for the woman-hating propaganda that it is, and whenever women apply it to themselves ironically or casually throw it around in jest, it makes doing this very difficult, as well as possibly retraumatising the women and especially lesbians who have had to endure truly horrific misogynistic and lesbophobic 'TERF'-inspired abuse and threats.

OP posts:
Datun · 23/09/2017 07:49

Today 03:20 SerfTerf

On a more strategic note, I'm all for the TRAs existing in a state of frothing rage, because in that state, they are much more voluble and provide a rich and constant crop of the female penis/words are literal violence/cotton ceiling/science is bigotry balderdash that the average citizen can see right through.

It's an odd one. I thought of terf as a slur, but it didn't bother me as much as it does now.

It seems to have leaped into a different realm of effectiveness.

Mainstream media are starting to use it, without really understanding the negative connotations. But clued up people online also use it as a matter of course. People who are even anti the rhetoric.

It's as though you can be fully cognisant with, and anti, the ideology, but still not yet be a terf.

Of course, you will be forced into that category whether you like it or not. But some people still think it is only reserved for certain type of feminist.

That slight distinction, I believe, is becoming more entrenched.

I've seen exchanges where the women are called terfs, but the men, who say exactly the same thing, aren't.

It's definitely become loaded with far more misogyny lately.

It's as though you can disagree with the ideology, but if you're a feminist, that's 10 times worse.

I'm slightly worried that the distinction will stick.

"Gosh, no, of course you can't change sex, but I'm not a terf"

But I also agree that the more splutteringly angry they become, the quicker they expose themselves.

It's why more oxygen has the flow through the debate. Basically, if you grasp biology, you're a terf.

But some people (feminists) are more terfy than others.

Kursk · 23/09/2017 03:27

I can't say that I have thaught about it that much.

SerfTerf · 23/09/2017 03:20

On a more strategic note, I'm all for the TRAs existing in a state of frothing rage, because in that state, they are much more voluble and provide a rich and constant crop of the female penis/words are literal violence/cotton ceiling/science is bigotry balderdash that the average citizen can see right through.

The more emboldened they become in spouting their nonsensical creed, the more abusive they are to women and refuseniks, the faster the bien pensant classes surrender to them, the quicker this all goes mainstream and the whole country hits peak trans.

SerfTerf · 23/09/2017 03:13

I can't get worked up about their petty slurs, as you can probably tell.

BitterLittlePoster · 23/09/2017 02:55

TERF has never felt that insulting to me. I know they mean it to be but yeah, I do think transwomen should be excluded from some places. I love Meghan Murphy and I have to think some more about her article.

If you've read her piece and the horrifying abuse she gets and your response is post a fucking Biscuit , there's something wrong with you.

Datun · 22/09/2017 20:10

*hate speech

Datun · 22/09/2017 20:06

Terf can't be categorised as speech towards women in general, because being a woman isn't a protected characteristic. It can be if it's directed towards lesbians though as it is attacking their sexual orientation.

Mind you, it attacks the sexual orientation of everyone. If gender is now considered the basis for sexual attraction, not sex.

LanaDReye · 22/09/2017 19:58

Why the negative button mother?
I think interesting points are being raised and a debate could take place?

MotherPeresA · 22/09/2017 19:32
Biscuit
DJBaggySmalls · 22/09/2017 16:54

If terf is lesbophobic or homophobic, then its considered hate speech and its illegal in England.
However, its still not considered hate speech for a religious person to say homosexuality is a sin. Religious belief seems to be protected over orientation.

''Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's... sexual orientation is forbidden.
Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden The penalties for hate speech include fines, imprisonment, or both''

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_the_United_Kingdom

Its interesting that radical feminists are accused of being allies of the right, when in the same way, trans activists seem to be allies of religious fundamentalists.