LordRandallXV
Cool story bro.
Earlier in the thread you talked about how this board is basically middle-class middle-aged white women who have never been murdered, raped, etc.
The incredibly long post I wrote before I posted about the study was mostly (for the lurkers whilst) directed at you as a response to your claim that we are all living in our ivory towers discussing the travesties of the peasants below. Because you believe you have just as much of a right to have your opinions considered on women's issues as us (as per your assumptions that we don't know of which we speak) even though you are a man. That you know better our suffering, our demoralization, our subjugation, and our anger. But really you are just another "dick" trying to tell a bunch of "pussies" (double entendre intended) what to think on a feminism board. It is really fucking hilarious. 🤣
Quite unsurprising that you chose to ignore that post and jumped on the study that I posted which properly reflects (by the way) the experiences of not only myself but most women I've had any deep conversation with.
There are lots of bogus studies out there that aren't peer-reviewed and they don't hold any weight (anything McKinnon talks about etc). But newsflash, this particular study was based on data collected by the United States federal government health services, authored primarily by a female and co-authored by a mixture of female and male medical doctors (so not biased based on sex in regards to data collection and analysis), and is peer reviewed meaning a valid study - published by the American Medical Association.
Furthermore, did you see the age ranges of the data collected? Did you also see the average age of the victims as well as the perpetrators? And you want to focus on female violence from bogus studies?
British Psychological Society
www.google.com/amp/s/medicalxpress.com/news/2014-06-women-aggressive-men-relationships.amp
A survey conducted by polling 1,104 students (706 women and 398 men) at a university is hardly representative of the population of men and women. I look at more people than that when I do market analysis for a potential area of service for clients. Additionally, that study was not peer-reviewed as the BPS just recently adopted registered reporting which allows them to have peer review. The "study" is from 2014 thus before peer review. Between the small sample set as well as the fact that the survey was of college students the study is invalid for the reported topic.
Women are more violent, says study
www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-are-more-violent-says-study-622388.html?amp
Where's the study? There aren't any links to it in the article of course and there's no reference to peer review or what publication published it as a scholarly article or study. If not peer-reviewed or published his analysis is completely subjective thus not valid.
Women Can Be as Violent as Men
quadrant.org.au/magazine/2018/09/women-can-violent-men/
Now we're into actual publications that are peer reviewed. But the sample age was 18-28 (again, likely college students) so while valid data it is not representative of the breadth of the population. Surveys conducted by polling people three to four years past completion of brain development are not a good marker to apply to society as a whole only application of said statistics to that demographic are relevant.
US National Survey: more men than women victims of intimate partner violence
www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17596591211244166/full/html
Emerald is a publisher who acquired another publisher (Elsevier) as well as others and then published studies on predatory publishing citing "predatory" practices that all of the original and acquired companies are known to demonstrably practice (not citing authors, advertising via studies, illogical and unfounded "studies" etc.). Funny that, none of their studies mention themselves.
Additionally, the survey reviewed from the US was from one year - (2012) whereas the date of collection began in 2011 and continues through today. Why I wonder did Emerald Publishing's Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 155-163 author of the study ignore the first year of data?
As per NISVS, the data collected is a complex sample survey, sampling weights are needed in statistical analyses in order to make inferences to the U.S. adult population. Additionally, these surveys are conducted via random telephone dial contact to domestic households only and does not take into account those that are homeless or those living in DV shelters or temporary housing.
And considering Bert H Hoff (study sole author) is an individual with a JD he likely does not have the statistical analysis skills required to analyze such data. Because nowhere in his education would he be required to study complex statistical analysis. People like Bert contact analysts to analyze their data but since there is no analyst citation I surmise that he wrote some macros in Excel or used the simple LexisNexis statiscal tool meant for simple data analysis (primarily financial operations) and plugged in the numbers and declared it STATISTICAL ANALYSIS. The University of Phoenix is a commercial (for profit) college whose graduation rate is 17% with student loan defaults at 26%... UoPX has been under investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission since 2015 and still is today - it is owned by a private-equity firm. Bert H Hoff is an adjunct professor at UoPX (with no other affiliations listed or found online, like he hasn't done anything notable in academia beyond declaring "women bad, men abused, poor men!") so I highly disregard his standard of ethics. Also, I can't find any evidence that he ever worked in law by searching public documents from US district courts (if he couldn't pass the bar he definitely isn't capable of statistical analysis). Full stop.
No one here denies that men are also victims of DV, however, as feminists we don't center men. Why don't you take your worries to a men's board and do something to support the men of which you speak? DV perpetrated against men is a men's issue and you are on a feminism board.
So ignore and deflect if you want but you aren't fooling anyone here with your bogus "studies" supporting your MRA arguments.