Ok MrGHardy it is a very simple, but terribly viscous cycle. Society objectifies women in two major but related ways, as sex objects and as mothers. Both forms of objectification confers an intrinsic value on women (as objects). Men go on to resent the intrinsic value women as objects possess, leading them to hate them (misogyny).
Women resent being objects as objects have no agency or at least less agency relative to men, men resent the intrinsic object value of women as although men have more agency if they fail to make anything of themselves that agency is viewed as unfair responsibility on males that women are free from. Not comprehending a gilded cage is still a cage.
Shuffle in race, class and economics to obsfucate these fundamental imbalances. Throw in a few high flying women to make it look like you've solved the problem when you haven't, and we're now arguing haven't we got there? Women have the vote, Thatcher, May yadda yadda.
Prostitution only exists thanks to the relative wealth inequality between men and women. Fewer women would do it if they had more agency, but we all collude to keep women down thus ensuring a continual supply of desperate women, and if the native women start doing comparably better we can ship more in from abroad thanks to globalism.