Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can anyone explain queer heterosexuality to me?

183 replies

featherland · 08/07/2017 22:40

I have noticed over the last few months / years more and more people I know on Facebook identifying themselves as queer, even though they are in heteronormative relationships.

For example, I went to a friend's wedding. It was very traditional - big white gown, all male speeches etc. she has been with her husband since she was a teenager and never (publicly) been in a relationship with a woman. She describes herself as femme and queer - and often posts photos of herself looking very beautiful and typically 'feminine' (makeup, pretty clothes ..) describing herself as such, with loads of pride emoticons.

I just .. Don't get it? I understand the desire to reject gender norms and heteronormativity. But surely those of us who are straight and in monogamous relationships can't just claim the word queer when we receive (willingly or not) all the social privileges of being straight?

And I can understand wanting to stand in solidarity with LGBTQ people. But don't we need to change heteronormative society rather than muscle in on the spaces created by and for people who are marginalised? Eg I am not married, mainly because I can't reconcile myself with the patriarchal history of marriage. I don't see that doing heteronormative tings and saying that you aren't is really queer? If there is such a thing as queer heterosexuality shouldn't it be about living in non normative ways?

OP posts:
Freshprincess · 09/07/2017 13:49

Interesting thread as I had been wondering what the Q in LGBTQ was for. I'm in my 40s so queer to me is an insult for a gay man.

Lurkedforever1 · 09/07/2017 13:48

juggling I suppose so but imo that's rather backwards in itself. It comes across as though it's trying to reassure lgb people you are ok with them, aren't you open minded as a straight person to allow people to have different sexual preferences to you. Giving yourself the right to approve. A bit 'othery' if it's used for that purpose.

If you really aren't prejudiced then you just think of people as people, rather than in terms of their sexuality.

LassWiTheDelicateAir · 09/07/2017 13:35

Could some of it be about wanting to be an ally though? Better to over identify with the LGBT+ community than to be predjudiced against people and homophobic?

No. Why do you need to identify or over- identify to support rights of LGBT? I can no more identify as a lesbian or a bi- sexual than I can identify as say black or ethnically Jewish or an American indigenous woman.

QuentinSummers · 09/07/2017 13:28

www.advocate.com/current-issue/2017/7/05/what-queer-family-looks#article-content

Whole thing is weird. Conventionally attractive man/woman relationship is an example of a "queer family"? A woman who's been in a sexual relationship with a man for a decade describes herself as a lesbian? So weird

QuentinSummers · 09/07/2017 13:21

feather and ovaries I'm with you too, have nearly started a thread about it loads of times. I had a relationship with a woman shortly before I met my husband and it confused the heck out of me as I'd assumed I was straight (was twenty). Then met husband and been with him 20 years. I hate it when I'm asked for a label. There is no point describing myself as bi because I'm in such a long standing het relationship. But then I feel disloyal to the woman I was with.
And I hate being asked as I find it all so confusing. Luckily most people don't bother asking as I'm a married mum so totally boring.
These people who post things like that on FB make me cringe. Read a really irritating article about it recently, I'll post a link

JugglingFromHereToThere · 09/07/2017 13:20

Could some of it be about wanting to be an ally though? Better to over identify with the LGBT+ community than to be predjudiced against people and homophobic?

Mylittlesunshines · 09/07/2017 13:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Notmyrealname85 · 09/07/2017 13:03

Does mother have another meaning?

mayoli · 09/07/2017 12:16

... or they're just bisexual?
Blimey.

Lurkedforever1 · 09/07/2017 12:13

The simple explanation is that they are attention seeking idiots. It's just bollocks. Even more so if you need to validate your self worth by sharing a sexual identity that doesn't exist on social media.

VestalVirgin · 09/07/2017 10:27

I mean she could be bi and just missed an opportunity to partake but...

She could, but then, wouldn't she use the word "bi" instead of "queer"?

After all, "queer" means nothing these days, and I assume most people are aware of that.

Not the way to go if you want your bisexuality to be visible.

M0stlyBowlingHedgehog · 09/07/2017 09:48

I'm struggling with "mother" as a cultural label too. Surely you're a mother if you have primary care responsibility for a child (whether by giving birth to that child, adopting the child, or being in a LTR with the woman who has given birth to that child) and you're female.

Or are you thinking of the crap stereotypes that go with being a mother (HCPs saying "and we'll just ask mum where it hurts, shall we?" or people at dinner parties assuming you had a lobotomy along with your c-section and can no longer discuss politics or culture or science...)? Because that's just an extension of gender stereotyping, and comes back to the standard radical feminist analysis that we are oppressed because of our child-bearing capacity. It's not motherhood itself which is problematic, it's society's attitude to women generally and women who have become mothers specifically.

IndominusRex · 09/07/2017 09:36

It either means they think they have quirky hair, or they think they're kinky in some way. Neither is probably true. But yeah oppressed much, or something.

SayNoToCarrots · 09/07/2017 07:57

also to some extent the cultural label 'mother' (which I also find really problematic)

Sorry to go off topic, but how is 'mother' a cultural label, and why do you find 'mother' problematic? Surely you just are or aren't?

Datun · 09/07/2017 07:49

featherland

Forgive me if this is prying, but I'm trying to get my head round it. (I'm old and straight).

Is it because people just assume you are straight and therefore the fact that you are attracted to women is something that never comes up?

And that makes you feel uncomfortable because people make assumptions?

Datun · 09/07/2017 07:40

Got it.

Just another term to describe perfectly ordinary people, then!

Strewth. When did being cool beome only about who you shag? It's like nothing else exists.

All the different genders being about who you are, or are not, attracted to, today only, of course because tomorrow it's all different.

Sex positivity. Being queer. Pansexual. Ace. Incel.

When did it become peoples' defining feature?

And do they all talk about it to each other? Is this the limit of their conversation?

I've got all the information, and I still don't get it.

.

featherland · 09/07/2017 07:29

ovaries I'm also bi, but met my dp when I was 22 so hadn't even come out to my parents yet. (I was in relationships with women, but not living with any of them). We have the same thing happen with celebrity crushes! But seeing as I was so young when I met dp, and dont plan to be with anyone else, I feel like I have to accept that to all intents and purposes I'm (seen and treated as) straight. There are loads of things about a heteronormative lifestyle that I find problematic, but while I receive passing privilege, I feel like i can't really claim to be anything else.

I suppose that I feel like the label 'straight' and also to some extent the cultural label 'mother' (which I also find really problematic) are attached to me whether I like it or not. Just like 'queer' was attached to people before it was reclaimed. I don't like lots of the associations of those labels but I recognise they also bring me privileges, and I feel likens have to reconcile myself to them somehow by challenging or expanding the terms.

But all of this is very personal to me - I've never really discussed it before. So I'm really interested in hearing how other people do it.

OP posts:
featherland · 09/07/2017 07:08

Thanks for all the replies. Hmm it is sadly as I suspected.

OP posts:
Notmyrealname85 · 09/07/2017 02:04

I mean she could be bi and just missed an opportunity to partake but...

Sounds like she wants to be special. But she's borrowing a label that others have fought tooth and nail to wear without being subjected to violence, and she can go back to hiding with her husband if needed. Even in seemingly safe places there's still so much violence against LGBTQ. And if this sounds repetitive, it's cos the hate hasn't stopped!

She's probably just trying to snazz up a boring marriage tbh

A fair weather gay!!

CaretakerToNuns · 09/07/2017 01:54

They're just a bunch of hipsters looking for attention. Just like transgenders, they take all the focus away from the LGB community and redirect it onto themselves. Bunch of wankers.

MrsTerryPratchett · 09/07/2017 01:43

Andrew Garfield was at it recently.

"I could be gay" he said, "if I ever fancied a man, shagged a man or did anything remotely sexual with a man, but I haven't, but I totally could, honest. Also I watch gay people on TV and some of my best friends are gay and everything. Like me! Find me interesting!". I may have slightly misquoted.

OvariesBeforeBrovaries · 09/07/2017 01:20

Datun I think it's like being bi but a bit less.

Like a woman saying "Oh I wouldn't want to sleep with a woman and I probably wouldn't want to kiss one unless I was drunk but I once kissed a woman when I was drunk and I didn't vomit so I'm now queer, and I got an undercut so technically I'm also genderqueer, time to update Instagram".

As opposed to people who are bisexual because they'd happily have sex with a man or a woman; and people who are genderqueer/agender because they disagree with the concept of gender entirely and do not feel that they fit into society's "male" or "female" boxes.

Pansexual is the usual term for people who are bi but will sleep with trans people too. The slightly less-PC way I used to describe the difference between pan and bi is that I am bi because I want a sexual partner, not a Kinder Surprise Blush. I would be fine having sex with a female-to-male trans, but not a male-to-female.

I think that's more out of protest at concepts like the cotton ceiling, and the male-to-female transgender community invading female spaces and shutting down conversations about female biology, menstruation, childbirth etc as it isn't "trans-inclusionary" - something that hasn't been replicated by the female-to-male trans community.

Datun · 09/07/2017 00:35

OvariesBeforeBrovaries So is it meant to be like being bi but a bit more?

Is it meant to encompass people who are bi but will also sleep with trans-people, maybe? Which, to me is bi, really. Unless there are some bisexual people who will sleep with each sex, but not if they're trans (which to me is a lot less about sexual orientation and more about not picking people who will suck the life out of you).

MrsJayy · 09/07/2017 00:24

Woman in question has been with the same man the dad to her kids for years as far as i know not had another relationship other than him.

MrsJayy · 09/07/2017 00:21

I think it is to appear interesting and to show they are not dull most people have quite an ordinary life get up go to work blah blah being something is better than nothing I know somebody who Ids as queer obsessed with drag queens does the make up posts on facebook. In reality she gets up sorts out her children goes to work makes the dinner, like most of us being queer relieves the boredom imo