Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women and mental health services

90 replies

BBCNewsRave · 03/01/2017 20:14

Been thinking about a lot of things recently. Hope I can put this coherently...

Basically I'm concerned about the effect of mental health services on women, regarding therapeutic approaches and general approaches of professionals, including misogyny and attitudes to abuse and expected gender roles. (Am in the UK so specifically thinking about NHS services).

For example, everything seems very focussed on positive thinking, thinking about what you can change in your life rather than what you can't. This is I suspect very influenced by severe funding shortages meaning a service that tries to get people vaguely functioning in their expected roles ASAP rather than bringing about lasting insight or change. But sometimes, people need to get angry. On a personal note, despite feeling terrified and helpless at some of my life experiences, simply understanding the context is a help.

I suppose I sort of feel that services gaslight women. (Potentially men too, but I think there's particular issues for women.) A service that aims to get a woman out the door as soon as possible isn't going to be very good at spotting the signs of abuse, for example - or at least, of realising abuse is happening rather than the woman just being mentally ill. And in fact services try to push as much care as possible onto family/friends of the unwell person, so a woman could be doubly trapped.

Also men working within mental health services can come with shedloads of misogynistic attitutes (as can women actually). I won't repeat some of the advice I've been given here but it's hair raising.

Plus the whole idea of trauma as a mental illness, naming the problem as being within the person rather than the experiences they've suffered. Are women viewed as unstable because on average we kind of are, as so many have been traumatised (by men) over the years?

I don't know... I mean, psychiatry is set up to preserve the status quo, I guess. So it shouldn't come as a surprise... (And saying something like "psychiatry is set up to preserve the status quo" sounds like tinfoil hat territory... amazing how th system does that to you Wink)
I suppose I'm still reeling at the shock of a system one expects to be there to help, not being. In fact potentially being harmful. And a sort of realisiation I'm not that crazy, but the world sure is

I hope this post makes some kind of sense... er... Smile

OP posts:
hotmail124 · 06/01/2017 16:23

My cpn did manage to see my DH though and asked him questions about my ability to clean, care for the children etc... Without seeing me or the children or my house and just took his word for it.
Shock wtf! It's the The Handmaid's Tale' !
Thanks for posting, this is so important to share. I am learning so much about something I had suspected, and so many of us are forcibly isolated through gender structures in this country, it's brilliant to find out what's really happening. Also, none of this valuable anecdotal data seems to be on any reports into gender and MH

Take care Thadius , no wise words, really but I hear what you say.

Even 40 years ago in Glasgow, new mothers were entitled to council provided house help in the early weeks of this job. Women were at least given a while in hospital to recover.

With my last, I gave birth at 7am. They needed the hospital bed at 8.30am and I was making tea and looking after my 3yr old and new baby at 1pm. While husband slept.

Very few civilised cultures across the globe would treat new mothers like this, like breeding cattle. In China, new mothers, used to, at least, spend a month recovering and being fed and pampered.

And English birth procedures in hospitals are awful and exacerbate trauma and injury. Dutch women are encouraged to give birth naturally and stress free at home, and then have again, civilised financial and practical support for the new mother.

AtrociousCircumstance · 06/01/2017 16:17

This is an amazing thread. OP, you are struggling - and succeeding in your attempt - to describe a situation where the very service which is set up (supposedly) to help you is more focused on fitting its idealogy into the constraints of their finances and the system within which it was created.

It is hegemony. Systems support systems.

However that doesn't mean that medication can't be be useful sometimes, and certainly I am a big believer in therapy where experiences and situations, and the feelings they triggered within us, are analysed with support and attentiveness. Unfortunately this kind of therapy is expensive and hard to find (some practitioners aren't competent). But it can be life changing.

Drugs and cbt are quick fixes whereas human understanding, kindness and giving someone the space to feel heard - helping them slowly build a sense of security - is real healing. It's sad that this is in such short supply and our society doesn't operate around that premise.

I wish that there was a way where people could come together within a community, tell stories, listen to each other, hang out, eat together...spend time together in a healing way which didn't revolve around drinking or religion.

Just wanted to say, I hear you.

Thadius · 06/01/2017 16:02

I am finding this thread very interesting.

I have recently come under the care of CMHTs but after two months and being told my cpn will arrange a visit with me I am still waiting.

My cpn did manage to see my DH though and asked him questions about my ability to clean, care for the children etc... Without seeing me or the children or my house and just took his word for it.

Before I got passed on to CMHT everyone's main concern seemed to be getting me back to work, wife and kids with no real interest in why I have problems or what I feel.

woman12345 · 06/01/2017 15:40

would be hideously impractical for whom? Namey Just depends on where you think resources should be spent.

Talking cures work, pills and CBT don't always, according to this great documentary on radio 4 today.
www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b084x6m6

Imagine a world in which middle class and upper class white men were being forced to stay in abusive relationships because they have no other option, told they were suffering from PND after having to provide 24hr care for a newborn infant after a serious medical episode they had just endured, etc etc.

If they wouldn't put up with it, why should the rest of us? Economic and social equality is being decimated. That is having a deleterious effect on a range of people's mental health.

M0stlyHet · 06/01/2017 15:10

"Are you speaking from experience? Is this thread really about the fact you've been diagnosed with a PD and you're pissed off about that?"

Namey, you're not coming out of this looking very good. That's a pretty unpleasant personal attack on someone who is suffering from mental health issues and not receiving the help they need. Yes, I get that you've been lucky enough to receive the support you need from NHS mental health services. That's great. But it doesn't change the fact that many women are not, and there is a long and well documented history of institutionalised sexism within psychiatric medicine which is probably playing a part in that situation. You coming on here and saying "I'm alright Jack" would be like me going onto a thread about poor maternity provision in overstretched London hospitals and saying "I don't know what you're all making a fuss about - my maternity care in my small, regional, well-funded hospital was excellent." By doing this you are in effect claiming that they haven't experienced what they actually are experiencing, and by way of evidence referring to something completely irrelevant - a one off anecdote that you personally were okay.

scallopsrgreat · 06/01/2017 15:01

Talking therapy can be pursued on a private basis by those who want it. And afford it Hmm.

And I find you very aggressive and confrontational. Whereas It would carry about as much weight as this argument. isn't confrontational or argumentative at all.

HorridHenryrule · 06/01/2017 14:23

I think the best therapists are the ones who go through it themselves. They understand and they get it where as book worms will never understand how you feel.

HorridHenryrule · 06/01/2017 14:19

When I went to my doctor when I was depressed all she offered me was anti depressants. How is that going to help me solve my problems by turning me into a zombie. My mum was on them for years and it never helped her. The doctor refused to give them to her in the end. There is no funding for therapy for people who need it and the doctor can't wait to throw you out of the room.

colouringinagain · 06/01/2017 14:18

I didn't read it as OP blaming mental health services for having suffered abuse, but that mental health services often don't/can't treat root cause of trauma which is now leading to poor mental health. Often sticking plasters of cbt and anti depressants are all that's offered.

nameychanges · 06/01/2017 14:11

Often diagnosed as "personality disordered" for a start!

Are you speaking from experience? Is this thread really about the fact you've been diagnosed with a PD and you're pissed off about that?

nameychanges · 06/01/2017 14:05

I don't think it's reasonable to blame mental health services for the fact that people have abused you. I'm sorry it's happened to you, but blaming healthcare professionals seems pretty bizarre. And I find you very aggressive and confrontational.

colouringinagain · 06/01/2017 13:54

Great thread OP.

Completely agree with other posters re pnd. I would have worn that t shirt. I had a horrendously traumatic birth, pain for 6 months,was isolated, had mastitis three times. Of course I was depressed and traumatised, but that was a completely proportional response. Not an illness.

I think approaches like anti-depressants and cbt are quick and cheap ways of dealing with far more complicated situations like posters have mentioned in terms of abusive relationships, and other very, very difficult life situations. In reality though many good doctors hands are tied by the sheer lack of any other services.

I'm interested too in the idea re suicide rates in women being lower as a result of their ultimately responsible role as care giver.

My husband is currently under section for the second time in two years. Previously the stress of dealing with him and his illness has had bad effects on my mental health. So my notes now say mental illness. They should say carer of husband with bipolar with psychosis diagnosis and mother trying to keep things normalish for two young children.

I'm sadly not convinced his hospital stay is in any way therapeutic either.

BBCNewsRave · 06/01/2017 13:37

Parity with physical health would be a start.

People just have no idea how crap the system is. They can do it for physical health, but the public dont care enough for mental health. It's one of the hardest things actually - people judge you and think you're not trying hard enough because they assume there's help there that just isn't. I've actually contacted my MP's office and they were concerned about me there and then and suggested I self-refer into the service for the time being! Goodness know what imaginary service they had in mind.

OP posts:
BBCNewsRave · 06/01/2017 13:29

Also do some research and you'll realise how horrifically most women who have bene through abuse are treated. Often diagnosed as "personality disordered" for a start! A label that meant exclusion from services until 2007. And a case of abusers having the same label as their victims. Not that the abusers usually seek help.... it's the abused who get the labels.

The NHS doesn't really do trauma. Unless it's from a war zone - soldiers actually have different access criteria to services, if not specialist services. So being a traumatised woman is lower priority than traumatised men. And in general they just don't recognise it. Everything's very simplistic, the idea of past harm affecting someone doesn't make sense to them, you can keep telling them and they just doint take it in.

OP posts:
Kanewreck · 06/01/2017 13:25

Which can't be correct. There needs to be a clear plan put in place, a proper efficient process, that models the private sector. It needs reform

Kanewreck · 06/01/2017 13:21

I think the difference in private mental health service and NHS mental health service is vast. Much greater than any other area of private service and the NHS.

BBCNewsRave · 06/01/2017 13:20

Oh i've jusy realisw you written loads of bollox namey just becaus they helped you. Well lucky you, i'm alright Jack. FFS. How exactly did they treat abuse without recognisisng it? I was told to stay in two different abusive relationships. Even when this guy had revealed he was living a double life and had stolen hundreds of pounds from me, they said i should stay with him. So have a little think and realise that just cos you're alright doesn;t mean the system is generally up to scratch. If you got helpf for abuse ypu are a very rare case indeed

OP posts:
BBCNewsRave · 06/01/2017 13:17

Oh also namey private therapy is no good if you're really struggling - they expect you to have background support from the NHS for safety reasons. My therapist stopped seeing me because of this - too risky for her for me to have no support.

OP posts:
BBCNewsRave · 06/01/2017 13:13

That's ridiculous, namey. For a start, there are different severities of depressiona and anxiety. I've been unabe to work for years due to my mental health - it would be much more economical to provide therapy. More to the point, I AM at risk of harm, and have in fact been harmed. My suicide risk is increasingly higher, and I've been repeatedly abused by opportunistic men because of being vulnerable.

And talking therapy cannot be pursued privately by many, especially the most unwell, precisely because their mental health means they have a very low income. It's not a luxury, fgs, its to correct years of harm done to me by others! And i'd need significantly less therapy if they'd done it in my teens when I asked instead of treating me horrifically and compounding the issues, as well as encouraging me to walk right into further abuse.

Do you think patients who want expensive treatments for physical health should pay for it themselves, or are you just cold and callous to those struggling mentally?

Plus how on earth do you think they "relieve symptoms" without sorting out the underlying problem? They don't/can't. That's why lots of us get no therapy at all.

OP posts:
AgentCooper · 06/01/2017 13:09

Wow...this has got me thinking.

I have a diagnosis of Generalised Anxiety Disorder. I saw a great female counsellor for 8 months last year but we had to stop as she was a student and her placement was ending. I really wasn't convinced at first - she was a CBT therapist mainly and I've had CBT on the NHS numerous times and found it useless. But she also had training in person centred counselling and we just talked, talked and talked.

It made me realise that my anxiety comes from trying so hard to be the perfect daughter and wife. I felt like I didn't know who I was anymore and hadn't for a long time when I walked into that office. I still have a long way to go but I keep reminding myself that I have a better understanding of who I am and all the pressure I've internalised. And this is the case for so many women - stamp your anger down, lose sight of yourself, feel like it's you that's broken when expectations are what broke you.

Kanewreck · 06/01/2017 13:08

True but it makes the system inefficient. Generalised treatment doesn't really tackle the problem.

nameychanges · 06/01/2017 12:52

Depression and anxiety are so hugely common that to provide every patient with free form talking therapy (which often takes place over years, sometimes even decades) would be hideously impractical. That's why the focus is on relieving symptoms, not digging into why things have happened.

Care is prioritised for those who are psychotic or at risk of harm. Talking therapy can be pursued on a private basis by those who want it.

Kanewreck · 06/01/2017 12:48

Free form talking, is also crucial in the assessment of mental health, imo.

Kanewreck · 06/01/2017 12:46

No assessment. It was completely patient led. The courses were for depression, anxiety and also CBT.
As you know depression and anxiety can manifest from many things. It can be a biproduct of many conditions or experiences.

nameychanges · 06/01/2017 12:37

Kane you seem to contradict yourself there. Courses are designed to help certain conditions, so an assessment must have taken place in order for appropriate courses to be offered.

"Free form talking therapy" is not proven useful for most psychiatric conditions.