Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Math Magazine and 'good' porn.

582 replies

MrsToddsShortcut · 20/08/2016 10:28

While I can see what she is trying to do, is the concept of 'nice'/'good' porn still not skirting around the same ballpark as all the hideous, damaging degrading stuff? It's still effectively saying porn is okay. Or would you say this is closer to erotic writing, I.e no real people involved? Is it just the wide end of a very nasty wedge? Genuinely not sure how I feel about this.

Huff post article about Math magazine

OP posts:
TeiTetua · 08/09/2016 16:46

There was a scene in Alison Bechdel's "Dykes to Watch Out For" where Mo, her hopelessly well-meaning heroine, is about to starve to death in a supermarket. She's saying something like "Organic here, fair-traded over there--what can I do to be saved?" Fortunately a friend arrives to distract her and the story moves along.

It's irreverent to think this, but mass-produced food allows us to be extremely well fed comparatively cheaply. ("Live well for less", where did that come from?) We can fret over organic this or that, but in fact life expectancy is over 80 at this point, so whatever we're getting isn't killing us very fast.

And regarding pornography, it's such an intellectual morass if you really get into it. We can say "Let's get rid of all of it" but that turns out to be involve vague definitions and telling people what they ought to want, and I don't think much of a consensus is ever going to happen. Maybe that leaves most of us in the position of helpless liberals.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 08/09/2016 13:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

VestalVirgin · 08/09/2016 11:16

Because being gay is not a "sexual urge" any more than being straight. There is a lot more to being gay than having gay sex.

Exactly.

Besides, it is really easy to figure out that homosexuality harms no one, while BDSM is all about harming people, either directly, or implying such by roleplaying out power differences that in reality lead to people being harmed. (Yes, we are told that doing it right is about doing a limited amount of harm to people, but even if no marks are left and everything is alright some hours later, things that cause pain still harm.)

There's lots of lesbian radfems, and there's lots of radfems who feel drawn to BDSM erotica.
And there is a reason why lesbian radfems are in happy relationships with women, but tend to be critical of BDSM.

Felascloak · 08/09/2016 08:16

Because being gay is not a "sexual urge" any more than being straight. There is a lot more to being gay than having gay sex. There is not a lot more to watching porn than watching porn.
It hacks me off that people co opt other agendas to make a point on these kinds of controversial topics. To make it appear if you are anti-porn you must also be anti-gay. Its incredibly annoying.

Bitofacow · 08/09/2016 08:09

I am lumping porn with other sexual activities because it is a sexual activity. Why is it demeaning to link being gay and BDSM? I have no problem with either, I am not judging.

The reason I mention being gay and BDSM is that have both (still are?) groups that have been condemned and told to ignore their sexual urges.

Slippery slope argument - its a continuum- all sex is a slippery slope to something. This issue is where do you draw the line - l think I have explained my compromise argument in some detail.

I would not presume to judge other people's sex lives, as long as they have made efforts to ensure they are safe, sane and consensual. Please refer to my previous post re consensual porn. Mak

HapShawl · 08/09/2016 07:48

Thanks Felas, that's what I was trying to get at. Also those sexual activities that people get up to in person (like BDSM) you have a better chance of ensuring everyone involved is consenting fully

It is also possible that many of the people who do not watch porn on ethical grounds would very much enjoy it, and feel its "pull", but choose not to because of their ethics. Rather than shrugging and saying helplessly "well it's my kink"

Felascloak · 08/09/2016 07:42

That kind of argument is a slippery slope to pro paedophilia. People can and should be able to control their sexual kinks.
It's not equivalent to homosexuality. Homosexuality is about a lot more than a sexual pull and it's demeaning to gay people to line their gayness up on the same category as people who like BDSM.

HapShawl · 08/09/2016 07:40

But why are you lumping in watching porn with those other sexual activities?

Bitofacow · 08/09/2016 07:25

HapShawl - I tried really hard to make it clear I was not doing that. The next line that you do not quote is " They are not happier or better people".

Very slowly. If you do not share this particular pull/desire/kink it is hard to understand. In the same way some people regard being gay as something people could just ignore. In the same way the BDSM community face prejudice and are told to just ignore their desires. It is different to you, not better or worse.

And if you don't like porn that doesn't make you frigid, miserable or morally superior.

Clear enough?

HapShawl · 08/09/2016 06:45

"I know lots of pro porn arguments focus on how dull, grey and joyless people who oppose porn are. I have tried really hard not to say this. However, if it is not something you enjoy it is hard to understand the pull and a lot easier to condemn. Sex is a massively powerful influence in SOME people's lives."

You're still equating anti-porn with anti-sex

LassWiTheDelicateAir · 08/09/2016 00:45

Basically, porn is filmed prostitution, and since I don't believe in purchased consent for sex, I don't think any prostition is okay, therefore porn, even when the woman is really, really enjoying it, is not feminist from my pov

I agree. Porn is just filmed prostitution.

So far as the enthusiastic amateurs, what about candaulism? How could you be sure both were equally enthusiastic?

Bitofacow · 07/09/2016 21:31

Here goes Buffy
Does porn hamper women's liberation while "remaining part of the overall disciplining of sexuality? Yep, probably does."
It could be argued that body discipline is so prevalent that ALL sexual encounters are influenced by it. Monogamous sexual relations are moulded by societal influences and so confirm the participants in their gender stereotypes. No sex will liberate women from body discipline. Would anyone suggest we forego all sex?

The level of acceptable risk is a personal compromise. The level of harm acceptable seems to be tied up in whether people think sexual harm is different and therefore worse than other harm. I think harm is harm and don't really see how people can buy products made by children while condemning porn. Harm was caused. So as discussed previously the issue is where you are prepared to compromise. I try to source as many purchases as I can ethnically, porn is just another one in the list.

We could disappear down a legalising prostitution rabbit hole, no surprise to discover I would. If you believe women can never make informed decisions about porn or prostitution we are always going to disagree.

I know lots of pro porn arguments focus on how dull, grey and joyless people who oppose porn are. I have tried really hard not to say this. However, if it is not something you enjoy it is hard to understand the pull and a lot easier to condemn. Sex is a massively powerful influence in SOME people's lives. They are not happier or better people they just have different demons. Dismissing the pull and then condeming it as "something you don't need" because I don't need it is very dangerous and shows a lack of empathy. We will never make any progress if we don't try to understand other people.

In relation to the suppliers of porn I would apply the classic Marxist interpretation, it is not the specific industry but the nature of capitalism that is the issue. I will restrain myself from going in to detail as I will disappear up my own arse.Wink

I don't think many people perform the mental contortions I go to to justify their actions. Should I just embrace my inner pervert and stop feeling uncomfortable (I don't do guilt)? I understand what you say about going to the gym makes you happier. I am joking about being shallow, I think. But honestly sometimes nothing beats a great, big bag of greasy chips. And a pie. With gravy. Mushy peas?

And finally, practically a ban would not work. Incremental steps towards reforming porn is my view the only practical way forward. (Please forgive me Mr Marx for my capitulation to the hegemony).

Felsa I have lots of opinions on FGM but I don't want to hijack this thread. It is a massive issue 200 million women, today, now, in this world are suffering. There are practical things I can actually do to help stop this.

sillage · 07/09/2016 17:49

"If you believe, sillage, that a woman selling sexual consent amounts to her acceptance to be raped, then produced commercial porn is rape."

Oh I don't believe it amounts to her acceptance to be raped, I believe, based on what men who prostitute women say and do, that men who make and consume porn think prostitutes can't be raped.

"the treatment of an actor is separate from the treatment their act depicts."

Can you stop focusing (aka shifting the responsibility) on the prostituted women who are economically extorted into unwanted sex and spend some energy questioning why and what it means that millions of men are masturbating to the idea of anally raping their babysitters (and stepdaughters, nurses, teachers, secretaries, etc)?

"If most porn tittles referenced acts of women being abused in some form, I would say there is a fundamental problem with how men want to see women depicted in porn."

You say this, but if you meant it then you would have read the research posted earlier showing virulent misogyny in the vast majority of pornography.

www.academia.edu/14444093/Aggression_and_Sexual_Behavior_in_Best-Selling_Pornography_Videos_A_Content_Analysis_Update?auto=download

"Many critics of antipornography efforts have suggested that researchers pick out the most violent and aggressive videos available to alarm the public about potential harm or degradation in adult video texts (see interview with Ernest Greene in The Price of Pleasure, Sun & Picker, 2008). By selecting top-renting and best-selling videos for analysis, we attempted to provide a picture of what is commonly consumed. Our results suggest that popular pornographic videos contain high levels of both verbal and physical aggression...approaching 90%."

The population of titles for this research was drawn from a compilation of 250 best-selling and 250 most rented video lists published monthly by AVN. The researchers selected the top 30 videos appearing on each list from December 2004 to June 2005. After deleting duplications, the population consisted of 275 titles (AVN, 2005). Fifty titles were randomly selected from this list to comprise the sample, yielding a total of 304 scenes.

On the whole, the pornographic scenes analyzed in this study were aggressive; only 10.2% of scenes did not contain an aggressive act.

Physical aggression was much more common than verbal aggression occurring in 88.2% of the scenes, whereas expressions of verbal aggression occurred in 48.7% of the scenes. By far, the most common verbally aggressive act was name calling (e.g., “bitch,” “slut”; 97.2% of all 632 verbally aggressive acts).

Women were verbally insulted or referred to in derogatory terms 534 times, whereas men experienced similar verbal assaults in only 65 instances.

A total of 9.9% of scenes analyzed contained positive behaviors. Most of the positive behaviors observed were kissing, but laughing, embracing, caressing, verbal compliments, and statements of “making love” or “I love you” were also noted.

ATM was depicted in 41% of scenes. Logistic regression analyses revealed that ATM was a strong predictor of the presence of both verbal and physical aggression in the scene. We argue that this provides criterion validity to ATM as an inherently degrading practice and suggest that future studies continue to code for its presence.

Among the 50 randomly selected pornographic videos, there were 6 films with titles suggesting that the female performers are young or underage, such as “Teen Fuck Holes,” “Teenage Spermaholics #3,” “Anal Teen Tryouts,” “Cum Craving Teens,” or “Barely Legal #50.”

Xenophile · 07/09/2016 11:44

I think that, on balance, I have to agree with Glosswitch here when she says:

With porn or sex work, I just don't understand how someone thinks they can tell by outer appearances whether someone else is being coerced

And once you at least accept that coercion is a possibility, I don't understand how you can justify taking pleasure in it

So called ethical porn often doesn't add up when scrutinised and if you accept that there is the possibility of coercion/pain/harm, which realistically you have to do, then consuming it just makes you part of the problem.

OutsSelf · 07/09/2016 09:39

Still catching up on thread so apologies if I rehashimg something. To me, as a feminist I don't think there is such a thing as feminist porn at the moment because of the structural relationships. Basically, porn is filmed prostitution, and since I don't believe in purchased consent for sex, I don't think any prostition is okay, therefore porn, even when the woman is really, really enjoying it, is not feminist from my pov.

I think if we really want to deal with the content of porn as femisinst/ not feminist, there should be a ban on anyine ever making money out of any porn product. Sites hosting porn must not be able to make any revenue from adverts/ clucks, makers must not be allowed to receive payment for their work. If all the pornographers were doing it all out of the goodness of their heart, and there was no money to coerce consent from performers etc then we might be in a position to have arguments based on genuine consent/ freedom of speech etc, and focus on content would not obscure the wider structural oppressions that porn takes part in.

To me, at the moment, all the, but-she-likes-it, it's-for-women is just smoke in front of the real issue, which is that porn is prostitution and therefore inevitably connected to global sex trafficking whether or not the individuals in one particular film or transaction were themselves trafficked or regard themselves as coerced.

DadWasHere · 07/09/2016 09:23

If you believe, sillage, that a woman selling sexual consent amounts to her acceptance to be raped, then produced commercial porn is rape. But if you want to make a case that commercial porn is all about the depiction of women being degraded and abused, I see that as another issue, the treatment of an actor is separate from the treatment their act depicts.

Bringing up 'I Blackmailed My Babysitter’s Ass' and investing substantial worth in 'the story' of its tittle seems pointless to me, like bringing up 'Lord of the G-Strings' and discussing the validity of why female elves are so irresistible to human men. The sex acts are real, the framing of them is a fiction. If most porn tittles referenced acts of women being abused in some form, I would say there is a fundamental problem with how men want to see women depicted in porn. But your case seems akin to going into literotica and deciding its 20,000 tales of non consent and rape represent the mainstream drive for works of written fiction.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 07/09/2016 08:54

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Bitofacow · 07/09/2016 08:18

Makelovenotporn - amateur porn uploaded by individuals checked by the website.

Off to work now.

MatildaOfTuscany · 07/09/2016 07:55

"Teddy bears..." - I have recently been informed that there is a whole sub-genre called fluffy! I think that's where you might be going.

But on a more serious note, in addition to sillage's point, the other thing is (as with other sorts of porn supposedly produced by consenting participants) "how does the end user know?" Putting their sex lives out on the web on public display could be a kink the couple share. It could be something one member of the couple is being coerced into (shades of that 18th century scandal where the man got off on peeping through the keyhole while his wife took a series of lovers because he told her to), it could be an act of revenge porn - couple made video for private use during the relationship, then one posts it after the relationship ends. If anything, home made porn comes with even less chance of the user being able to check its provenance than so-called feminist porn with its framing of actors discussing consent before and after the filming.

Felascloak · 07/09/2016 07:49

dad Yes well done that was buffys point. No porn is ok against a backdrop of unequal sexual relations.

bitof FGM is serving some purpose or it wouldn't still exist. I'm not sure I would describe it as making people "happy" but there is a subset of men who would be unhappy to find their wife hadn't been cut. FGM is also there to subjugate women and put their sexual experience below that of men
I'm not arguing for one minute porn is equivalent to FGM. I'm arguing that both have the same root, I think you wanting to campaign against one and not the other is more indicative of your cultural values and the society you have been raised in. You've been socialised to believe porn is not too harmful as much people in cultures with FGM have been socialised that FGM is necessary

Bitofacow · 07/09/2016 07:43

Matilda " and the thing is for me there is no absolute need for porn" that is correct. There is no 'need' for it and you don't feel the pull. And that is OK. However, for lots of people while there is no need the pull, the lure, the thrill is very, very strong. And that is OK too.

I won't buy Nestlé. Aren't I moral? Actually I never drink coffee anyway so it causes me no harm. I won't go to Sports Direct, but hey I can afford not to, so that's easy for me to say.

The pull or porn is very strong, if you are in to it.

So Dadwashere even though no porn meets the moral bar I would ideally like to think I have, I indulge while assuring myself (hypocritically?) that what I look at is ethical. Big compromise I know.

Matilda - teddy bears, get the teddy's and use them to work out what limbs go where.

sillage · 07/09/2016 05:17

"porn happy couples upload to the internet for free"

I file that one next to the other outlandish examples men concoct when women talk about the widespread problem of rape, things like

  1. What if we’re both drunk and she says yes to foreplay but right before I put it in she says, ‘No”?
  1. But if she’s walking naked through a park at night, some responsibility…

I’ve heard men give variations on that “naked in a dark park” scenario so many times during discussions about rape that it's downright freaky. It’s like they’re fishing for The Rape Line, that liminal technicality where they can sate their desire to get off on women they damn well know are unwilling while convincing themselves they're either blame-free or less to blame than they imagine her to be.

sillage · 07/09/2016 04:27

I used to watch pornography, but you don't have to watch it to learn enough about the product to act for change.

Remember John Stagliano, the pornographer from the earlier post who challenged Tristan Taormino to force anal sex on a woman who vehemently said "no"? Stagliano's company Evil Angel is releasing "I Blackmailed My Babysitter’s Ass" on Sept 19.

(link goes to Xbiz, the business website of the porn industry, no porn visible on this webpage) www.xbiz.com/news/211880

LOS ANGELES — Evil Angel has announced the release of director Kevin Moore’s “I Blackmailed My Babysitter’s Ass," which will be available Sept. 19 on DVD and VOD.

“The title is to the point — babysitters being blackmailed for anal sex by the men they work for,” Moore stated. In each of four scenes, a flirty tramp surrenders all three orifices to an opportunistic man of the house.

Alexandra Kelley, Evil Angel’s vice president of sales and marketing, notes that titles like “I Blackmailed My Babysitter’s Ass” are hot in the marketplace. She said, “Fans aroused by ‘forbidden love,’ ‘taboo relations’ and ‘blackmailed’ content like to fantasize on the ‘What if?’”

DadWasHere · 07/09/2016 02:36

I've noticed that the people who want to argue 'not all porn' seem to need to neutralise the broader arguments that can be made about inequality generally, and how it works, generally. In other words, if you want to argue 'not all porn' first you have to establish a backdrop where the relations between men and women - sexually and socially - are broadly OK.

Is 'all porn' any better? Not even porn happy couples upload to the internet for free would pass the benchmark you just set with that logic.

VestalVirgin · 07/09/2016 00:46

Bitofacow, why can't you get enthusiastic about banning porn while you look at FGM? This seems to be an appeal to worse problems. I am able to care about both at the same time. And would, in fact, argue that the two are connected.
Women voluntarily have surgery on their vulva to make it look more pornified. And porn actresses probably have to have it so they can get jobs. The two issues are not really that separate, even though cutting the inner labia is of course not as bad as the mutilation of the clitoris.

As for the difference between pragmatism and being okay with something morally, indeed, yes, we do a lot of things we shouldn't. I recently bought unfair trade chocolate. I admit it.

I also contributed to the polyamory on AO3 blushes

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.