Having sex with transwomen is so much better than with those frigid women

As well as all the horrors of vaginas, the idea that all women are and want to be submissive and "led" sexually makes me throw up a bit in my mouth

I see that the definition of a woman is one who understands the needs and desires of men. I hope that transwomen, like all women, want a bit more for themselves than this.

By the whole 'they understand men much better' is he not surely saying 'because they think like men'?

Which kind of undoes his argument of them being women, does it? They feel like men in that case.

So if any transaction activists use it as a good thing they need to realise it doesn't do them any favours.

The author is clearly suffering from internalised homophobia.

Sorry I meant to say Twit as well :)

Emphasis was on the COMPLETE not a "bit of"

It's also pretty insulting to trans women and suggests they are an homogenous group.
You could replace every trans woman in the article with 'nurses' and every cis woman with 'flight attendant' and it would read much the same

I was trying to avoid genitalia words!!

No "bit of a twit" about it

He is a complete twat.

who based on the second article seems to have failed at relationships with women, because they didn't want relationships with him (I can imagine this is the type of idiot who tries it on and fails because the woman who says no to him must be a lesbian) and now he seems to think transwomen are just waiting to meet him, the man of their dreams! Because you know "they understand him"

It's insulting on so many levels to women and transgender women.

Part of me feels a bit sorry for them actually. Saying that transwomen have 'better proportioned bodies than cis-women' suggests to me that this person doesn't actually find women all that attractive. That anal sex is ok because a transwoman is a woman, not a man.

It's so very deeply homophobic. What messages has this person been given in their lives to get to this point?

That's an immensely smug and stupid article written by a bit of a twit.
the superior tone is just laughable.
You know what trans world - I don't think I'm superior to you lot because I am comfortable with my birth gender so don't be lording it over me because you arnt.

I thought the Op was being facetious with the use of that term.

Fucking hell.

I agree- I wouldn't call transwomen 'real' women. They're not

Rea

That is ridiculous. It's a way for homophobic men to indulge their forbidden fantasies and still be allowed amongst his friends cos "it's a woman really init"

What a ridiculous thing for them to say

Apparently women are not real women - transwomen are

transgender woman are women, and in many ways they are probably the only women around. A transgender woman, due to her unique position of being born in the wrong body, understands the needs and desires of men in ways that are impossible for an average cis-woman

transsingleblog.wordpress.com/2016/05/30/why-get-a-transgender-girlfriend/

trans-exclusionary feminism

WTF does that mean? Why do people have to make up all these weird definitions instead of saying what they mean?

im speechless...

I also have a sneaking suspicion that the author hasn't actually slept with many women at all, trans or otherwise.
The whole article screams bad trans Mills and Boon

Oops, should say "this article was just horrid on every level".

I'm ok with my feminism excluding anyone who is openly contemptuous of women, such as the author of this article, and anyone who thinks it's saying something worth saying.

Just horrid on every level. Unpleasant, delusional, misogynist and not even well written.

That's a hell of an article.
Manages to insult transwomen, born women, gay men, bisexual men and straight men in a few short paragraphs.

Dont get excited morris

I am fairly convinced that there will be more "peak" to come

Save some of the mint cake

IKR Morris, it's like scaling the entire Alpine ranges.

Peak peak peak! Dons knapsack, grabs crampon, eats mintcake.