Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

feminist views of TTC?

33 replies

RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 27/06/2016 22:30

Do you think there's a feminist issue around the way we talk about it? I was thinking about all the language (baby dust, babydancing and so on).

I'm noticing it because at the moment DP and I are TTC with donor sperm, and we go to a clinic where, obviously, a lot of the couples are straight couples who're having difficulties. The nurses refer to us (and presumably all the women) as 'girls', and although I would imagine they see a fair number of lesbian couples (and single women), all their paperwork is presuming you're a male/female couple, so it got me thinking about how men are expected to feel/think. It does feel as if there's an odd mixture of euphemisms that talk down to women.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 23:44

(Should add: the info about heritable diseases, though funny, isn't quite as bonkers as it might be, because unlike yours, stealth, ours did distinguish between single women and women with partners, and did make you sign as the partner, so you have the same bits of the form as a male partner there, and he could be passing things on genetically. I'm feeling I have to say this as I'm now feeling oddly guilty about how I may have sounded about my clinic!)

OP posts:
RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 23:40

YY, I thought it was standard to test sperm first, too - it is so simple, after all, and painless, so why not?

stealth - that paperwork sounds better than what we had. In fact the clinic insisted on asking me about heritable diseases and things like that. Which made us laugh because they were so obviously not relevant! And they are nice people and found it funny too - this absolutely isn't me having a pop at the clinic, because we chose the place that got the best results and that is what is important. It's just me noticing little things about language and attitudes along the way.

The whole process obviously is woman-centric, and I guess what I'm wondering is whether the terminology is a clumsy, ad hoc way of attempting to make up a little for that? A sort of 'yes, men, you are very important despite standing around looking a bit lost with not much to do'?

It might just be anecdata, but then (as I said), it is replicated in the way the language used in your average TTC situation paints the man as a bit of a lad getting loads of sex, while the woman is supposed to turn into some kind of cooing, twee little flower.

OP posts:
stealthbanana · 28/06/2016 19:30

I was never addressed as a girl either when we went though IVF. Always Ms Banana or "Stealth". And actually I think the process is very woman centric - I noticed the paperwork actually only cares about what responsibility the owner of the sperm has towards the mother - thus every form distinguishes between a husband, a de facto male partner and a sperm donor situation. It's only interested in the woman whose womb is the subject of treatment. I think that's quite narrow but I understand why. And there's no distinction between using a sperm donor as a single woman or as half of a same sex couple. It makes sense as to why.

Pregnancy, on the other hand, is a shitball of twee stereotypes about women, I think premised on the idea that pregnancy & motherhood are the pinnacle of female achievement so all is sunshine & unicorns regardless of the multiple indignities of pregnancy. Spare me!

JessieMcJessie · 28/06/2016 19:09

Were not we're.

JessieMcJessie · 28/06/2016 19:09

Sperm test was the first thing all doctors looked at with us- it's pretty obvious. And as I said before nobody at our fertility clinic ever called me a "girl"- I was simply addressed by my name, as was my husband (nobody called him Sir either). Those we dealt with did not try to infantilise medical terminology either, but we're still able to explain in layman's terms. Going by this thread I feel we were in a parallel universe fertility-wise.

MrsFionaCharming · 28/06/2016 14:31

I read an article a while ago - can't remember where - which said that male infertility is often the last thing to be tested for when a couple is under-investigation. The article posed that this was anti-man, focusing on the woman, but I felt it more anti-woman, assuming that women cause the problem, and putting them through lots of invasive tests before asking for a sperm sample.

RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 10:06

Cross post.

choc - that's really interesting. Yes, I think I agree. And you would never (I think) say 'sirs' to a room full of men. You use it in the singular. Yet the me are all addressed with 'excuse me, Sir' or 'Is it David' or whatever.

What you say about erasing individuality slightly reminds me of the way some couples say 'we're pregnant', too.

OP posts:
RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 10:04

I'm not criticising the clinic staff at all - just commenting.

And I agree medical/scientific terminology can be upsetting, but it can also be reassuring. And I think there are multiple ways of being informal, not all of which would have to reinforce gendered ideas about women wanting to be described as if they were younger than they are, which is what 'girls' ultimately is.

Interesting what you say about women being more used to invasive procedures. I can believe that's a big part of it. And also I guess women go into TTC expecting at least some bodily intervention.

OP posts:
ChocChocPorridge · 28/06/2016 10:03

I'm trying to work through this in my head.. but.. I think it's something to do with 'ladies' or 'girls' being used to erase me as a person. You would never walk into a room and say 'hello women' and is that because it's a more formal term? Less patronising?

Eg. a midwife talking about 'her ladies' lumps everyone together rather than them all being individuals, it trivialises it somehow.

I think it's different in a medical setting to among friends too.

This isn't properly formed in my head yet - it'll probably come together about 2am tomorrow morning

WellErrr · 28/06/2016 09:51

I think medicalised and scientific in a fertility setting CAN be very upsetting for some people.
People tend to take fertility for granted when they're young - it's just a natural thing you 'should' be able to do, and when things don't work out an overly medicalised setting can just reinforce people's feelings of 'failure.' This has been the feeling of friends I've known undergoing treatment.

I think there is more stigma attached to make infertility, but I also think that women are far more used to a) invasive medical procedures, and b) talking to other women about their health and bodies.

I don't think the clinic staff are doing anything wrong in trying to make the experience more personable and informal.

RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 09:32

I do also find it striking that 'medicalised and scientific' is presented as a bad thing - given your average toothpaste advert is chock full of scientific witter, you'd think some people would be attracted to that.

OP posts:
RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 09:31

No reason you have to agree! Smile

Not putting a gun to your head here.

I agree with you that it's intended to be friendly. But don't you think it's interesting that the men don't seem to be 'lads' or 'guys'. They are referred to either by name, or as 'sir'.

People seem to behave differently, too - if the waiting room is full of women, there are friendly smiles and a bit of chat, or women look worried if someone comes in looking sad. The men seem much more ill at ease. So you could be right they are suffering from being treated more formally and with less warmth, but I wonder if it's also related to the fact that infertility for men seems to come with a different stigma.

OP posts:
WellErrr · 28/06/2016 09:24

I think there's something a little odd in adult women referring to their 'auntie flo'. It's as if we're distancing ourselves from our bodies a little. I don't know if that's embarrassment, or part of a wider tendency in society to be patronising to women in the context of motherhood.

I just don't agree Smile

We give many things in life nicknames. Sometimes it's just a friendly way to talk about stuff. I say 'willy' rather than 'penis' - I'm not being patronising to men, it's just colloquial speech.

I think the trend you are speaking of in a fertility setting is similar. It's an attempt at friendly colloquialism, which for many people will make the process seem less medicalised and scientific. I don't have a problem with being referred to as a girl - if I go out with my girlfriends I say I'm out with the girls. It's friendly.

RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 09:12

Oh, sorry, reading back I probably should have addressed that to well.

OP posts:
RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 09:11

Thanks erin, that looks interesting.

choc - yes, terminology has to be sexed, but that's not to say it has to be gendered. You need to be able to refer to wombs and sperm and so on. You don't need to be calling women 'ladies' or 'girls'. There's no strong reason why language used largely by women is quite twee (and I have seen the twee language on MN, though I agree there's less of it here than other sites), whereas men seem to get the 'you must be shagging like rabbits, ho ho' kind of dialogue.

People talk a lot about how coy terminology for biological processes/body parts is not good for young children, but I think there's something a little odd in adult women referring to their 'auntie flo'. It's as if we're distancing ourselves from our bodies a little. I don't know if that's embarrassment, or part of a wider tendency in society to be patronising to women in the context of motherhood.

OP posts:
HapShawl · 28/06/2016 07:35

"Gendered" in this context may not be referring to male/female/trans but to stereotypes. Hopefully the PP will be able to elaborate when she has time

WellErrr · 28/06/2016 07:29

I don't see the feminist issue here. Not saying there isn't one - I just don't see it.

I think something such as fertility should be gendered. The ever increasing notion that we can't call a woman a woman and a man a man etc is worrying.

Also baby dancing and baby dust are just awful and twee and not AT ALL used on mumsnet Wink

meditrina · 28/06/2016 07:17

MN doesn't seem to go I for the really bizarre terminology that surrounds TTC on other boards. I wonder if people self-select which websites they use?

Most of the time, other than formal speech, when "ladies and gentlemen" is traditional used as introductory/attention-getting phrase, there is simply no need to address people by sex.

If you need to specify men, which might happen around procedures where there are biological difference, it 's better to just call them "men" not "boys" or "gentlemen". That's unexceptional, isn't it? Ditto for women.

ChocChocPorridge · 28/06/2016 06:17

Absolutely. I don't have time to post properly right now but I went through fertility investigations and it was very gendered. There's a lot of gendered language too.

But it has to be sexed doesn't it? There's no point investigating a male for pregnancy issues or a woman for sperm ones - why on earth obscure that.

On the other hand, the assumption that the partner is the opposite sex could easily be changed. Yes, it matters if you're male or female, but it doesn't matter if the non-pregnant-to-be partner is male or female apart from which services to offer.

erinaceus · 28/06/2016 03:18

You might be interested in Karen Throsby's work on feminism and infertility.

Karen is Associate Professor at the University of Leeds and tweets @thelongswim.

Kerberos · 28/06/2016 00:15

was it MN that renamed Baby Dancing to Shagging with Intent?

RobinsAreTerritorialFuckers · 28/06/2016 00:11

jessie - we could change, I suppose, but this place gets good results. I'd rather somewhere that will get us knocked up asap, rather anything else!

I was more just wondering how other people think about it all in terms of feminism.

OP posts:
Postchildrenpregranny · 27/06/2016 23:35

What are 'baby dust'and 'baby dancing'?.Or should I just guess ?
I think I'd have been nonplussed if anyone used those terms to me

JessieMcJessie · 27/06/2016 23:31

Baby dust and baby dancing are horrifically twee and not popular on the MN conception chat boards.

We had several rounds of IVF and not once did anyone at the clinic refer to me or address me as a girl. Perhaps you need to change clinics. Guy's in London were good.

DetestableHerytike · 27/06/2016 23:29

Good point about the age thing; for many couples, it will have been a while of trying before reaching that point.

Swipe left for the next trending thread