Can someone please explain...

Senecafalls great choice and thoughtful. Funny how it didn't cross my mind when I saw it. The falls bit didn't register even though I found it intriguing that's why I asked.

quencher It's connected to the Seneca Falls Convention on women's rights, held in 1848 in Seneca Falls, NY. I used to use a different NN (and posted on the thread I linked to above under that name), but decided to change to something that had a feminist connotation. Also I'm American.

Seneca I don't remember how I missed that thread last year. I used to not to come on the feminist board that often. (out of interest, is the name connected to Seneca the young or is it just random).

Buffy Yes I have read some of bell hooks work. I remember stumbling upon it when I was about 14-15 in the library while looking for materials to write a poem for poetry slam. My biggest feminist influence is actually a white female teacher whom am still very close to.

Thank you. That's clear.

Lass it's from both, some feminist and the old misogynistic media with their ideals on what sells. To me it's become a confused ground when you have some feminist also at the same time campaigning to have the right to dress in that manner.

What the whole society is forgetting is that how people dress is relative. There is no absolute dress code that is normal because it changes all the time. Instead of stoping women from wearing cloths that show a lot of their breast. It might be best to break down the barrier on how we view breast. Not as a sex object but something useful in feeding babies. Normal part of the anatomy.

Dress code seems to matter more in feminism than breaking barriers on why they are viewed in that way. It's those views that need tackling.

Regarding some of the issues for women of color and feminism, this thread has some very thoughtful posts:

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/2316090-Feminism-for-women-of-colour

It might be possible that post-modernist feminism is being confused with liberal feminism, the roots of which are exactly as scallops and seneca described.

Pomo-feminism seems to be all about making men happy (I paraphrase obviously).

It's sends out a wrong message that anyone who does not subscribe as lady-like is not a feminist or is feminist-lite

Who or what is sending out this message? Sorry, I'm not following this.

I think a lot of people are wary about speaking on behalf of groups they don't themselves belong to as it can feel like you're not qualified to do so.
They are ok campaigning race matters sometimes but not ok when it comes to women of colour issues specifically. I think the shutting down of conversations and sometimes undermining the it's verity needs to stop. You don't have to be qualified to offer support. *
*
Also, can you expand on what you mean by patronising other races when it comes to clothing?
This was two points that got muddled up. Feminist criticism on clothing seems to be confusing at the moment. There is no middle grounds on what is right type of clothing or how people should go about it. Their criticism also undermines the different usage of clothing for women.
You have the slut shammers, the ones that criticise Muslims women for what they wear. There seems to be criticism for women who wear less and those that cover up to some a degree. I think for young women and men who do not understand feminism and how the Media uses sexist imagery to market products. It's not also comfortable being in the middle ground. It's sends out a wrong message that anyone who does not subscribe as lady-like is not a feminist or is feminist-lite
The problem with this way of thinking determines now
1- whether a woman is deemed worthy to be listened to.
2- it is used as victimisation for women who are raped by saying it's their fault for the way they dressed. Rape should be rape. no woman should be made to feel it's their fault a man could not keep their hands to themselves.

It's only relatively recently pleasing men has become a thing associated with liberal feminism
I think the current liberal feminist should be called post -liberal feminist or neo-liberal feminist. Unless there is already a name out there for them. I think have seen it mentioned on Mn.
I think you have always had women who are ok with pleasing men. Which is OK by them if they want to because that is a choice. What I don't like is trying to impose that on other people who are willing to move forward.

Accusations that white feminists aren't representing women from minority groups have been made for decades. White feminists have tried to respond, but the tension never seems to go away. I have the feeling that nether side entirely understands the other, and maybe they never can.
I agree with this too. I think it's easy to see race as colour but beyond that it's difficult to understand what goes on within those races. The same way I understand very little about Japanese, Chinese, Indian and Arab women as examples. The difference between someone like myself and other people is that if a Chinese woman tells me her issue or issues, Am willing to believe her. If I had a platform I would be willing to share it. Not from my point of view but express it as something that happens to them.

To be fair to Emma Watson I think she may be guilty of naivety bordering on stupidity and/or a lack of good manager /agent rather than deliberately promoting skin whitener.
That's the difference though. What you have said here is the excuse that is always given to white women. Everyone else can't afford the same mistake. They would have refused to listen to her feminist view and would have been called a hypocrite or whatever name appropriate based on the appearance.
The same mistake Miley Cyrus can afford to make by twerking but anyone else it's deemed part of their culture the whole race is stripped of respect. Looked through the lens of the few. *
*

Liberal feminism never used to involve being pro-porn, pro-prostitution and has always traditionally been gender critical. It's only relatively recently pleasing men has become a thing associated with liberal feminism. Many liberal feminists would be offended at the association.

Thank you scallops for pointing this out. I am a second wave feminist who back in the day would be called a liberal feminist because I have devoted much of my life to working within existing systems to advance women's rights. Second wave liberal feminism is certainly not "anything goes if a women does it or likes it" feminism.

To be fair to Emma Watson I think she may be guilty of naivety bordering on stupidity and/or a lack of good manager /agent rather than deliberately promoting skin whitener.

The Lancôme video for the product is completely generic with no voice over or shots of her using any particular product. I expect Lancôme has an oily/problem skin range or sunscreen range or sensitive skin range and the video would equally fit them.

It looks as if she signed a generic deal to allow the company to use her image without restriction.

Whether she and her agent should have read the contract and tightened it up and whether it is ethical for any famous person to endorse or advertise any product is a topic worth discussing but separate to this.

Accusations that white feminists aren't representing women from minority groups have been made for decades. White feminists have tried to respond, but the tension never seems to go away. I have the feeling that nether side entirely understands the other, and maybe they never can.

Bell hooks is great. She says "I'm black. I'm a feminist" and tries to reconcile the two, but the problem is still around.

What specific issues do you think white middle class feminists tend to miss? The fact that they think they have taken the lion share of campaigns for women around the world. The thought that without them feminism would not have happened. Most women of other races and of lower social economic backgrounds weren't sitting around being housewives or doing nothing about their rights. They just didn't and still don't have the same platform to stand on. The media reports still dictates who is listen to.
Poor white and black women would have been involved in some sort of poorly paid jobs. Most black women after the abolition of slavery became white women's hired help. When they went to campaign matches black women stayed in their house looking after their homes and children. Those that could joined the civil rights movement did this in order to get similar jobs like their female counterpart, to be able to attend the same schools, to be accepted in the same universities.

The other issue that white middle class feminist tend to miss is that if a black woman or woman of colour is to talk about feminism they will have to include race. Not just racism but the different types of sexism that exist within the patriarchal hierarchy. For a woman of colour they would have to fight sexism from their own race on how they are viewed which won't apply to white men, sexism from white men and racism in general including white women.
Another example where racism comes into play. Women of colour campaigning for equal pay is not only to be equal to men but also their white women counterpart.

White middle class women tend to ignore the double standard that white male sexism has over other races. In a America a lot of women of colour where sterilised without their consent or under the disguise of other procedures. The eugenics method was to control the population of blacks, Latinos and native Americans. This was discontinued in 1977. While white women where fighting for quality of the sexes, these other groups of women where fighting for women to treated fairly. White women fighting for contraceptives while other races fought for their reproductive system not to be controlled.

White feminist using black women's bodies to make feminist statements. Proving their point by putting another group of women down. Amy schemer, Lilly Allen, Taylor swift the list goes on.

Emma Watson standing tall and making feminist speech to the world. (Which by the way, another black woman had done months before. what she said was nothing new from the feminist stand point too). One was critiqued for their approach, slut shamed and called uneducated, criticised for being married while asking for equality and the biggest one of all was not being lady like.
The media applauded Emma Watson's wonderful effort while a cosmetic company displayed her image on billboards in Africa, South America and Asia advertising body lighting cream to women of colour. Her skin tone used as used for other women of colour to aspire to.

So here is a quote form Patricia arquette asking help for white women.
To every woman who gave birth to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for everybody’s equal rights, it is our time to have wage equality once and for all and equal rights for women in the United States of America.”

So the truth is, even though we sort of feel like we have equal rights in America, right under the surface there are huge issues that are at play that really do affect women. And it’s time for all the women in America, and all the men that love women and all the gay people and all the people of color that we’ve all fought for* *to fight for us now!”
How can she ask for other people to fight for equal pay for her feminism when other groups already include this on their campaigns.

How can they slat shame the black body (it's not like you can hide a black bum ) while creating slat walk campaigns and supporting miley Cyrus's twerking.

Part of the appeal for me in radical feminism is that it seeks to make life fairer for everyone. Liberal feminism does not want to change how society is structured, but promotes equality within that structure. The trouble with this approach is that it does not benefit all women (or men for that matter). Making sure that 50% of all CEOs are women, does nothing to improve the lives of those struggling to keep a roof over their head on minimum wage. Rich, well-educated women marry rich well-educated men and have rich well-educated children and the divide between those who have, and those who do not continues to expand. For those at the bottom, it makes little difference that they are oppressed equally by both men and women, or that the opportunities available to them are just as shit as those available to their male peers.

Maybe you would like this quiz bagheera

Liberal feminism never used to involve being pro-porn, pro-prostitution and has always traditionally been gender critical. It's only relatively recently pleasing men has become a thing associated with liberal feminism. Many liberal feminists would be offended at the association.

Also a great deal of the in roads we've made have come from radical thought. Making rape within marriage illegal for example. It is only because radical thinkers have shifted the Overton window that it has become unthinkable to many women that they should accept rape within a marriage.

You sound like someone with some interesting opinions quencher. What specific issues do you think white middle class feminists tend to miss? I think a lot of people are wary about speaking on behalf of groups they don't themselves belong to as it can feel like you're not qualified to do so. But white middles class feminists obviously need to listen to other groups as well as their suggestions on what we can do.

Also, can you expand on what you mean by patronising other races when it comes to clothing?

it is relatively easy to think liberal feminism will supply all the answers if you are a young, white, middle class career woman. It becomes much harder as a mother, carer, older, ethnic minority woman.
I could not agree more with that statement.

I would call myself a feminist. I don't agree with some of the liberal views, for example the making of porn, the acceptance of transgender based on having the similar brain to women (is undermines the whole basis of radical feminism that we are all the same, it also undermines the race because the theory that different races and women have different brains. This has been used to oppress both groups). The coercion of women into prostitution. However, I don't see the problem if a female asked to be paid for sex. However, I do feel that most of the women's situation can be avoided if society has been more fairer. The police should be able to listen to rape victims and all rape victims should be treated with equal measure regales of race and sex.

I do believe that patriarchy needs to be dismantled and there should be equality of the sexes and races on all walks of life. The liberal view seems to be all kumbaya about feminism.

I love radical feminism but I have a problem with some feminist who are self centred. Those that don't look beyond the lives of the White middle classes and think that every one has similar issues to deal with. The first group of radical feminist undermine a lot of other feminist groups that were a long side them. They had a platform to shout louder, they used the platform and ignored everything around them or didn't understand it. Even today they still don't. Their poster children still don't and yet they get more praise.

A few of the feminist incidences I can think of that is a bit of double standard is when it comes to clothing and how they patronise other races.

I also believe that for society to change both sexes have to see themselves as feminist. This will give women opportunity for equality and at the same time ease of the pressure on men who are unable to free themselves from the patriarchal system and feel that they can't cope but have to man up.

I also think that there are two types of liberals. The first feminist who wanted liberation for women and the extreme end you have now where every thing goes but is more geared towards the support of patriarchy in disguise in the name of feminism.

My biggest hate is feminist who refer to as others as "feminist lite". Shitbugs.

Good point about pragmatic approaches, Museumum. I tend to think that radical feminism is great for diagnosing the structural problems, and helping you think about the issues in new ways, but (given that what we do is constrained by living in a capitalist system with entrenched, gendered power structures), a liberal feminist approach of chipping away at the actual inequalities a bit at a time is more likely to bring results. (But like you, I reject their ideas around porn, sex work and the reification of gender).

it is relatively easy to think liberal feminism will supply all the answers if you are a young, white, middle class career woman. It becomes much harder as a mother, carer, older, ethnic minority woman.

That is a key point as to why radical feminism struggles in the UK. Girls out-perform boys throughout education. Women massively outnumber men as graduates. So during their most energetic, productive years they steam ahead in their careers. The current system suits them to a tee. It's very hard to convince anyone who occupies a system that gives them such advantages, that the system needs to be dismantled.

I struggle with the idea that each of us has to choose to "be" an X feminist or y feminist.

I guess that if I were writing an academic essay in changing the world for the better id propose radical feminism ideas.

But in my everyday (admittedly privileged) life I tend to more "step by step" changes like paternity leave and equality legislation.

I feel I'm too pragmatic and realistic to propose radfem solutions but I reject the ideas around porn and sex work that liberal feminists are accused of.
And I don't believe in inherent "gender" feelings so I have big issues around transsexualism.

So I guess I'm saying it's quite possible to be a feminist without fully subscribing to one school of feminist thinking.