Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Performing Femininity and Feminism

109 replies

OneFlewOverTheDodosNest · 24/11/2015 18:20

I've been wondering about the performance of femininity lately, how naturally it comes to some people versus others, and how it has shaped my attitude towards feminism.

For me, performing femininity has never come naturally - I can consciously mirror the actions but it's putting on an act that can be beneficial in certain situations and nothing sticks when I go back to being me, IYSWIM?

I know I've consciously chosen a more feminine appearance at work because the image of a successful businesswoman in my company means highly polished rather than just neat and professional. I'm careful to moderate my natural behaviour in meetings because assertiveness is seen as bolshiness in women. I feel like I'm playing a game without being 100% sure of the rules.

I think this pretence is, in part, why I've been drawn to feminism - because for me everything gender based is an act I'd be happy to be rid of. I'm sure some women find it comes naturally and would probably think this is strange, but is anyone else consciously playing along? And am I somehow doing feminism a disservice for my own benefit?

I've got a lot of thoughts jumped in my head about this that I'm trying to make sense of, but I'd love to hear others thoughts.

OP posts:
almondpudding · 24/11/2015 19:55

Sorry, my first reply was to dodo and my second to Buffy.

almondpudding · 24/11/2015 19:54

Yes, I think if you have some tiny elfin face you probably have to worry less about performing femininity but have to worry more about people being surprised when you are not actually going to act like a fantastical mythical creature, and are instead assertive, or just in a bad mood today.

almondpudding · 24/11/2015 19:49

Yes, I don't want to get all flippant about how we can just ignore all of this gender stuff, when you still have to go into work and act in an 'acceptable' way according to the rules of gender.

To speculate...

If we consider there to be different kinds of femininity, there are going to be difficulties in performing different ones. So younger women are more likely to be cast as object of desire, which many are very uncomfortable with. When you're older, it can be easier to take on elements of femininity, because the elements then are around 'Mummy' which has some positive connotations.

The problem then is that in certain kind of work places, any hint of mummyness is seen as a really bad, unprofessional thing, and requires a wholly different kind of femininity.

And that whole thing of putting on a suit and looking really groomed looks like a performance to me anyway, from men and women. And it is a kind of performance that doesn't really sit well with femininity. It always looks kind of awkward. I mean, who does do that well? Are there any famous women- politicians, journalists, business leaders, who do that feminine suit thing and it look good? Personally, I can only handle a suit on anyone if it involves tweed and elbow patches, or you're wearing it because someone has just died.

There is just something odd and sharp and pointy about the mix of femininity and business clothes. It evokes something strange.

BuffytheScaryFeministBOO · 24/11/2015 19:40

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheScaryFeministBOO · 24/11/2015 19:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OneFlewOverTheDodosNest · 24/11/2015 19:28

I'd also say that I think this social reaction can be even more extreme for men who don't perform masculinity successfully. So I don't think this is an issue that is exclusive to women, but it's definitely tied up with feminism in my mind.

I'm trying to say something about gender stereotypes and patriarchy but can't quite phrase it - but essentially, by not conforming you're threatening the patriarchal order and are socially punished. But that sounds too official and I think it's more subconscious and insidious than that

OP posts:
OneFlewOverTheDodosNest · 24/11/2015 19:23

Almond I think we're coming from the same point of view - when I say feminine traits I don't mean the natural behaviour of females, but the culturally expected behaviour that is seen as feminine.

Most people would think that sitting with legs crossed is a naturally female trait, but as someone who would much rather splay I know that I personally was trained into it by years of being told to sit in a ladylike way. I imagine some women naturally sit like this, and some were quicker to adjust to expectations but I still have to remind myself not to sit "like a man".

I think I see feminine behaviour as a social construct, but one that may come more naturally to some women than it does to me!

And I agree with your sister that the ideal would be to get rid of the gendering of behaviour, but I feel there is still social consternation or something when you don't adapt to the expected norms - particularly within a work environment. Am I making any sense?

OP posts:
almondpudding · 24/11/2015 18:57

Oh, I will just add, my stance prior to my sister's perspective was that as most positive human character traits - compassion, co-operation, nurturing etc are 'feminine' traits, femininity is to be aspired to for everyone, whether you are 'naturally' that way or have to work at it. And that has been my approach with my kids.

But that is generally my response to people claiming the benefits of gender fluid parenting.

There is a difference between saying it is okay for anyone to be masculine or feminine or a blend of the two, and saying we should stop labeling interests and attributes as masculine or feminine at all. I am leaning towards the latter now.

almondpudding · 24/11/2015 18:50

I think this is a fairly complicated question.

The first part of it would be to clarify what you mean by femininity. There are many different aspects to it: character traits, appearance, interests.

Even within that, often we are then talking about stereotypes of femininity set up and defined by men, rather than actual social differences between men and women. Can we say the culture of women, which is nuanced as any culture is, is different to the culture of men, and if so, should we call that femininity?

The next part would be when we talk about whether or not we are feminine, are we inventing a set of past events to justify who we are in the present. Because I would say that I am comfortable with femininity in myself, but then if I am more honest, I can remember hating it as a teenager, and feeling that even wearing anything feminine was inseparable in my mind from sexual harassment. I never wore a bra until I was in my mid twenties because of those feelings.

And mostly I think more and more that the very act of dividing things up into masculine and feminine, even just in your own mind, and trying to see how you relate to either of those categories is actually quite damaging. Because they actually say pretty much nothing about anyone's personality, anyone's way of relating to the world, or anything about you are as a human being.

I've changed my mind on this recently because my sister said to me recently that there are people who don't define themselves by any kind of gender, and then there are arseholes. And she's not some kind of gender politics person of any particular ideology. She has no particular axe to grind.

I think the whole masculinity/femininity thing is like an incredibly toxic and damaging version of defining yourself by the alleged character traits of your star sign.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread