Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Raping Asian girls worse than raping white girls because it 'harms their marriage prospects' :o

187 replies

OTheHugeManatee · 18/09/2015 09:42

Link

A judge has just ruled that a man who raped Asian under-13s should receive a longer sentence, because the victims' families were now worried about their marriage prospects. In other words, damaging these girls' property value in the marriage 'market' actually counted in terms of assessing the damage done by raping them.

I think this is horrific. Not just because virginity should have no bearing on the value of a girl or woman, but also because implicitly it seems to support the notion that underlay the belief of the Rotherham rapists that white girls were 'trash' who could be abused freely because they were already devalued. Like it's OK to rape white girls because they have no trading value.

I get that feminism coexists quite uneasily with cultural diversity, and this is a very difficult area to navigate, but really feel like this needs a feminist response.

OP posts:
JeremySpokeInClassToday · 18/09/2015 21:50

Petition signed and shared on Facebook, this is horrific.

YonicScrewdriver · 18/09/2015 21:48

Isabelle, I think in that case there might be something about the vulnerability of the victim in the impact statement/assessment.

I see your point though.

slugseatlettuce · 18/09/2015 21:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scallopsrgreat · 18/09/2015 21:46

Oh sorry Blush. I misunderstood your last paragraph.

Corygal · 18/09/2015 21:42

I was being sarcastic, scallops.

scallopsrgreat · 18/09/2015 21:39

"Who says we don't look after the UK's ethnic minorities?" WTAF??

IsabelleEberhardt · 18/09/2015 21:38

For my part, I am not sure that it's right to cite anything about marriage prospects but for the judge to hear about impact on schooling etc seems fair to take into account (without minimising a crime that happened to another girl who hadn't found her school life affected)

I see what you're saying here Yonic but I'm imagining a girl from a difficult background who perhaps may have been struggling at school anyway, perhaps she was struggling to have a good relationship with her family (if she has one) anyway, perhaps she has already got involved in a gang or drugs or whatever. Should her rape be viewed as less of a big deal than a girl with lots of prospects that are then damaged because of the affect of the rape? My heart says no.

I don't think the solution is to give a harsher sentence to the rapist of the second girl or you're falling into the trap of the worthy rape victim. The answer is to give an equally harsh sentence to all the child rapists I think.

MamaMary · 18/09/2015 21:36

I was livid when I read about this ruling. Utterly disgraceful.

Have signed the petition. Should you start a new thread to advertise it?

Corygal · 18/09/2015 21:33

The judge was 10 types of wrong.

I don't generally play Victim Top Trumps, whether or not it's the race/sex/religion version of the game, because it's boring. And counter-productive.

But the idea that non-muslim females, whatever ethnicity they are, are somehow less of a problem to rape is clearly playing Top Trumps with the law - repulsive.

Almost as repulsive as people who say that white privilege means you can't complain that your feelings have been systematically undervalued in law.

(Incidentally, not all muslims are non-white, and most black people aren't muslim. Just saying.)

So if you're a black male teenager, being stabbed is ok - but raping muslim girls is off limits because they might fetch less for Daddy in the passport bidding wars. Who says we don't look after the UK's ethnic minorities?

scallopsrgreat · 18/09/2015 21:29

And I don't think sexual assault necessarily carries a lower sentence than rape does it?

scallopsrgreat · 18/09/2015 21:28

I don't think that generally black victims of rape get much sympathy for rape tbh OhManatee. Someone on here said once about how getting a conviction for rape is all about how "clean" the victim is. If the victim is a WOC then that reduces the clean points before they are even on the stand due to institutional racism. So I find it a bit jarring to suggest that showing sympathy for someone's genuine cultural difficulties is somehow benefitting them and disadvantaging other victims.

However, I also find it jarring that this judgment was expressed in relation to how a man would view this poor girl. So I'm currently taking the splinters out of my arse!

BrandNewAndImproved · 18/09/2015 21:26

The judge did not say this sentence is a harsher sentence because this girls dad is upset that he can't marry her off anymore.

She gave a few reasons including that the girl was doing really well at school before this happened. If this was a white girl and the perpetrator caused her schooling to fall behind and change her character (as that's what they use to show change of character and impact) there wouldn't be a petition and no one would be upset that he got a longer then usual sentence.

YonicScrewdriver · 18/09/2015 21:20

I objected to your description of a 13 year old "performing oral sex" on a 30 something man. She is below the age of consent. It isn't sex.

YonicScrewdriver · 18/09/2015 21:19

I know. I was pointing out to you that oral penetration is not sexual assault, it's rape.

oldshilling · 18/09/2015 21:17

Yonic, the offender wasn't convicted of the offence of rape, that was my point. It was a sexual assault, which carries a lower sentence than the offence of rape.

OTheHugeManatee · 18/09/2015 21:16

But brandnew no-one wants to downgrade the guy's sentence. IMO he should be imprisoned for considerably longer. The point isn't to diminish his sentence but to challenge the idea that the impact of rape should be relativised according to how upset the victim's father is cultural context, when in fact the impact of rape on a victim just can't be measured like that.

OP posts:
YonicScrewdriver · 18/09/2015 21:16

SDTG, do you disagree with the general concept of victim impact playing a part in sentencing? I assume it does so for other non fatal crimes of violence too.

For my part, I am not sure that it's right to cite anything about marriage prospects but for the judge to hear about impact on schooling etc seems fair to take into account (without minimising a crime that happened to another girl who hadn't found her school life affected)

Or do you think the crime and aggravating factors should be the determinant of sentencing?

Genuine question, I think it's a tricky area.

OTheHugeManatee · 18/09/2015 21:13

scallops I think you're doing fine explaining yourself. But I don't think this is about trying to privilege any ethnicity.

To me this shouldn't be about pitting groups of women against one another in a competition for who gets the most sympathy for being raped based on their culture or skin colour. It's about challenging the idea that the harm done by rape should be evaluated with any reference at all to what men value about women - particularly the notion that women are 'dirtied' or devalued by having their virginity even against their will.

Rape is fucking barbaric whoever it happens to, whatever their cultural background, and should be punished as such. And equality in the eyes of the law is - or was, in theory - a fundamental principle in this country. I think if those principles are being relativised it should be challenged.

OP posts:
Onthescrapheap · 18/09/2015 21:13

Signed and shared. Thank you for starting this petition.

BrandNewAndImproved · 18/09/2015 21:13

No I don't. I believe in the way the system takes into account any impact crime has on a victim. You can't take out this girls cultures ramifications on the effect it would of had. I think signing a petition to downgrade this man's sentence is vile.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 18/09/2015 21:08

Do you think that it is OK to change white privilege by telling some women and girls that their rape is not as bad as others? I have a supportive and loving family - so if I get raped, it won't be as bad? How can anyone say that?

Theydontknowweknowtheyknow · 18/09/2015 21:07

This reminds me of an article I read on rape in Sweden where a Muslim leader said that it was better to rape native white Swedish women (as opposed to Muslim immigrant women) because they had a support network, weren't ostracised by their families and had probably had sex before. I wasn't sure if it is was right wing propaganda at the time..

It's buying into the idea that there are different levels of worthiness of women which is the idea that fuels rape in the first place.

BrandNewAndImproved · 18/09/2015 21:05

I think you explained yourself fine scallops,

Congenital belief about white privilege is a hard thing for anyone to change.

Fauchelevent · 18/09/2015 21:03

Normally I think MN misses the mark in topics of race but here I think the only thing worth pointing out is that it's not just white girls whose rapes are being invalidated, but any girl outside of the muslim community and that's being ignored quite a bit.

The point is though, when ANY woman is raped, the mans feelings are pandered to. In this one case where a sentence arguably punishes the rapist, it's not because the judge sees the emotional damage these rapes have done, that the girls' lives will be marred now by this trauma. No. The girls' worth TO MEN is what he is considering. Nothing to do with their support system (and anyway, I lost almost all my work colleague friends when I reported a sexual assault) but that now they're less valuable to men and he should be punished harsher for that. It's repulsive.

BrandNewAndImproved · 18/09/2015 21:01

No I don't think that's right at all op.

This girl has been adversely effected due to some part by her community.

Another girl with a perfectly supportive family and community may suffer mental health problems due to her sexual abuse and that should be fully took into account with sentencing even if another girl didn't have these effects.