It would be odd behaviour if I was a pimp or punter to be pointing out that the Greens' stance on prostitution is a reason for feminists not to vote for them. So, no, I'm not.
Laura Lee spoke at the NI Assembly - she is not from NI, she is from the Republic and now lives in Scotland. She was there to represent the International Union of Sex Workers. She confirmed that pimps are members of IUSW and later confirmed it has 10 members, she didn't say how many were pimps.
It's very uncommon for normal men to know about people like Laura Lee but she is extremely well known among that group of men who seem to think women's rights to be prostituted as sex chattels requires them to read everything and tell women how important this issue is for women.
As far as the Greens are concerned, according to their policy page, they consider prostitution to be a matter of "rights and responsibilities". Their general statement of principles talks about individual rights as well as responsibilities in how those rights are exercised.
They make this statement:
It is humankind's responsibility to carry out only activities that enhance or maintain the quality, variety, diversity, integrity and wholesomeness of human society and the life support system. Those activities which are exploitative, or threaten either the well-being of others, society, the life support system or the future must be avoided.
Which I would agree with. However, in their section on prostitution, they say:
the Green Party believes that attempting to stop the sex industry by using prohibitive laws is neither desirable nor realistic.
They are very clear that stopping the sex industry is not desirable.
They also say:
Criminalisation of many parts of the sex industry leaves those working within it in a vulnerable position. They are often unable to turn to the law for help in cases where their rights are violated, and instead fall prey to criminal gangs and pimps.
They are clear that they view the source of the harm as being criminalisation completely ignoring the source of the harm as the punters and pimps who exploit the women and inflict violence.
Their discussion on harm and exploitation comes later with some wooly minded acknowledgement of the harm and exploitation which includes limited regulation only of brothels while leaving other aspects of prostitution unregulated.
policy.greenparty.org.uk/rr.html
I'm also not sure about their approach to pornography. They say in the policy page that pornography should be permitted, no mention of regulation. How is that consistent with their opposition to page 3.
These are the sorts of reasons I would not vote for them. I can't see a coherent feminist approach to this issue, it seems mostly a libertarian approach.