Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lurkers ahoy! Friendly thread to dip your toe in the murky seas of feminism

241 replies

cailindana · 31/10/2014 08:17

A thread specifically for those who feel a bit out of their depth.

Ask questions, make comments.

All queries taken seriously. No sarcasm, no putdowns.

OP posts:
DuelingFanjo · 31/10/2014 14:11

"You say "for many reasons men are mostly less tied" to babies - I'd be interested to hear what those reasons are?"

well...

Because they are allowed to be, not just by society but by women themselves (though this isn't their fault IMO - it's the 'way things are').

Because even now, with new maternity/paternity splits working life is not set up to allow men to do equal parenting.

Because men who do childcare are looked down upon, even the childcare of their own children.

Because DR's appointments, present buying, party planning, meal making and so on are 'women's work'.

As I said in the other thread, I am often unwilling to post in the feminist threads because I feel like I am not as articulate as others but I do know that women get to do all the wife work and that includes looking after babies and children. Men have a get out clause which is purely based upon them being men in the first place and this is really ingrained in our culture/society etc.

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:52

Grimble - something I'm getting at is, do you think there's something inherently bad or wrong about a woman having photos of her own naked body?

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:50

Sorry Dueling I missed bit

"there is of course a wider issue to do with men being expected to do less RE childcare but I think focusing on breastfeeding means you are missing the point. Why pick on breastfeeding when there is so much more surrounding childcare that could be changed.
my pont being that parents are tied to their babies from the moment they are born, but for many reasons Men are mostly less tied to them and this goes beyond just the method of feeding.

Even bottle feeding mums feel more tied to their children than most men do."

I'm not picking on breastfeeding, a poster asked about it so I answered.

You say "for many reasons men are mostly less tied" to babies - I'd be interested to hear what those reasons are?

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:47

Dueling: "there is a feminist argument that pushing it and guilting mothers into it when they don't want to is another way to oppress women by tying them to their babies and ensuring that men get off scott free from the responsibility of feeding their newborn children."

hmmmm.... as a woman who has been breastfeeding for 4 years I find the idea that women are pushed and guilt-tripped a bit hard to agree with. Pointing out the fact that breast-milk is the healthiest and most convenient option for a baby is not pushing or guilt-tripping. The act of imparting this information doesn't force a woman to do anything she doesn't want to."

I agree that imparting the information does not equal pressure. However, MWs, at least in some trusts, are required to ask multiple times about how a baby will be fed, which is a form of pressure. It's a complicated issue, because I am all in favour of bfing, I think it's a marvellous thing, and I did it myself for two and half years. However, I think the support out there for bfing mothers, especially new mothers, is appalling, and given that's the case then the breastfeeding posters etc are just propaganda with nothing to back them up.

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:44

Grimble, I get what you're saying and I think we've clashed a bit on this point in other threads.

The way I see it, it's not about bad/good/right/wrong or criticism. Both women and men are human, they make mistakes. Women are not perfect beings who can never been called to account for their actions.

But, take the digital images thing. A woman has a body. She likes that body and enjoys having it photographed. So she allows a male partner to photograph her, she gets a kick out of it, all good. Then, later, that guy decides for whatever reason to plaster those photos all over the internet. Or, worse still, someone decides to hack into her computer and steal the photos and plaster them on the internet.

What should happen in this situation is people say "What a shit that guy is for stealing/breaking his ex partner's trust." Because that woman was perfectly entitled to take and have photos of anything belonging to her, including her body, it was the man who did wrong by exploiting them. Yet, the man gets very little criticism, instead we have people saying "she shouldn't have had the photos taken." To me, all that says is that 1) women aren't allowed to revel in their sexuality and have photos taken, they will be seen as silly and be made to feel ashamed for photographing their most prized possession - their body - why? What's wrong with a woman's body? 2) Why are women to blame for men's actions?

OP posts:
DuelingFanjo · 31/10/2014 13:42

my pont being that parents are tied to their babies from the moment they are born, but for many reasons Men are mostly less tied to them and this goes beyond just the method of feeding.

Even bottle feeding mums feel more tied to their children than most men do.

KateeGee · 31/10/2014 13:40

yes ballsballsballs, mine was 22 Jump Street. Very dubious in terms of feminist credentials, but man it was funny.

DuelingFanjo · 31/10/2014 13:39

"there is a feminist argument that pushing it and guilting mothers into it when they don't want to is another way to oppress women by tying them to their babies and ensuring that men get off scott free from the responsibility of feeding their newborn children."

hmmmm.... as a woman who has been breastfeeding for 4 years I find the idea that women are pushed and guilt-tripped a bit hard to agree with. Pointing out the fact that breast-milk is the healthiest and most convenient option for a baby is not pushing or guilt-tripping. The act of imparting this information doesn't force a woman to do anything she doesn't want to.

Women are already tied to their babies, even without breast milk, at least for the first weeks and months.

there is of course a wider issue to do with men being expected to do less RE childcare but I think focusing on breastfeeding means you are missing the point. Why pick on breastfeeding when there is so much more surrounding childcare that could be changed.

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:37

Penguins: "I would also be interested to know how many women were tuned in to feminism by parenthood. A combination of the sudden workplace experiences, the sudden divergence of my day to daylife and DH during mat leave, the gender stereotyping and realising the sexualisation of the society my Dd's would grow up in really opened my eyes."

Yup. I was always into feminism in a vague sort of way, then got into it more when I joined MN but since having DD, in particular (I also have an older DS) I have become passionate about it, partly because I see the inequalities in parenthood (and my own marriage has almost floundered on these rocks) and I worry so much about the world DD will face.

OP posts:
KateeGee · 31/10/2014 13:35

Hi AsAMan

Xfactor b... it's horribly sexist and I don't believe the producers care about the dancers talent more than they see them as very carefully chosen eye candy. That's not me being dismissive or not seeing the talent I just disagree with why they were put there.

This is a case in point. You have someone who has met and been taught by several people who have been on X Factor as dancers, even people who are working on it this series, who have discussed the process of auditioning, being selected for and working on the show, and it seems a relatively unsexist process. Some of them are drop dead gorgeous, but some are just run of the mill people who are only eye candy because they've been through hair and make-up, I could probably look as good with the same work and I am no oil painting. But you have just said "nope, it's sexist". I've seen your username before and consider you to be a reasonable poster who has opinions that I respect, and I don't take it personally, but I see how your response can be interpreted as dismissive and would put people off posting - this is certainly how I felt earlier in the week when I saw similar responses from other posters on the thread in question. It almost feels like if someone tries to provide an alternative view by saying "I think you are wrong because...", very occasionally it feels like they are shouted down by "nope, you're wrong. Patriarchy". So you can think, well, why bother.

Pole dancing ones always makes me feel conflicted. Yes it has horrible origins but if someone wants to climb a pole who am I to judge? Also ones about pubic hair removal. Whatever anyone does with their fanny is their own business as far as I am concerned, if I remove my hair but no one ever sees it is that a problem? If I hardly ever do it but one day decide to shave off all my pubes just because I feel like it but still no one is ever going to know, is that still the fault of the patriarchy? Even if it is, who cares? Is shaving my armpits as bad? I actually epilate them so I suppose that is worse? I have conflicting feelings about all of these things so I don't think either side is entirely right or wrong. But there was a thread a short while ago where someone said they liked the way it feels, they feel less sweaty if they remove their hair (I can't remember if it was pubes, armpits or what), and rather than accept that some people posted a ridiculous extrapolation about shaving their head to avoid sweating from exercise rather than washing their hair. It felt a bit sneery and superior to read it, it kind of felt the same as when I try to argue a feminist viewpoint with a non-feminist and they just make a joke out of what I say. It makes me feel small and stupid so I would rather not engage.

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:34

Squtter, I hope Buffy addressed your points? I agree with what she's saying BTW, and I was wondering what you think?

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:33

Maki and Amethyst, I would recommend Dworkin to you too. Download here.

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:32

Hiya Rufus.

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:31

'If women always seek to avoid confrontation, to always be "safe", we may never experience any revolutionary change, any transformation, individually or collectively.'

Well said prettygirl.

OP posts:
RufusTheReindeer · 31/10/2014 13:30

Just popping on to say hi

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:28

Hermit -do feel free to join in, I for one love hearing a new voice.

OP posts:
grimbletart · 31/10/2014 13:27

I've been a feminist since childhood (the 1950s!) and I have still learned an awful lot from FWR - so ta everyone. And thank you Betty Frieden, Simone de Beauvoir et al. Smile

I am not an academic feminist, just a get on and do it feminist, so to read what people who have actually done serious gender studies have to say is super interesting.

I mostly lurk, but do post when I feel ranty enough. However, I feel I am sometimes at odds with the prevailing opinion here in that I occasionally want to criticise women for some of things they do. And I am scared to do so because I believe (possibly wrongly) that any hint of criticism of women is immediately tagged "victim blaming". One example was on the revenge porn thread where I felt I had to tippy toe around the fact that I wanted to urge women not to do digital naked stuff, mainly because (as an ex media person) I know that once digitised you can never be sure where it will end up and you lose all autonomy, but also because even apparently nice blokes can go rogue.

I do feel that sometimes women can behave really badly just as men do and, while I totally accept socialisation, cultural forces etc. are incredibly powerful, I feel we are not special snowflakes who should be immune from criticism. I personally don't want a get out of jail free card because I am female - that only emphasises the stereotype that we are somehow weaker or to be protected.

Not putting this very well am I?……...

As OP promised no sarcasm or put downs I would really like to ask the regulars on here whether they understand what I am getting at and whether they ever feel that want to criticise something a woman has done, said etc. but hold back because of this "victim blaming" meme. And if so, is it helpful to hold back?

Sorry for rambling.

ballsballsballs · 31/10/2014 13:26

Hello all!

KateeGee I know what you mean about the cinema. I went to see Inbetweeners 2 this week and it was seriously sexist. And I laughed my head off.

I often think of this article when watching films:

www.theonion.com/articles/woman-takes-short-halfhour-break-from-being-femini,35026/

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:25

Down: "It's when the polemic is directed, or perceived to be directed at an individual rather than the system that many become defensive and aggressive in return. If women think they are being attacked and accused on a board, why would they continue to post there? Even if they were mistaken in how they felt and the ranty poster had no idea of how they were being received?"

This is an intractable problem in the discussion of feminism. If you say to a poster that her choice to shave, for example, has been informed by the society around her, you are stating a fact that has a lot of independent proof. Yet she, understandably, might feel you are calling her a sheep or implying that she has no mind of her own. This goes back to the whole separating the personal from the political while still understanding how they are intertwined. It's hard, and it takes time, and if a poster isn't up for that then that's ok. But feminists aren't going to change their views to make someone feel better. It gets frustrating constantly revisiting the same arguments over and over. Which is why I think this thread might be helpful - it can cover the ground that new posters need and hopefully help them feel confident in approaching other threads.

OP posts:
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 31/10/2014 13:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:20

Gimme - breastfeeding is quite a controversial issue as far as feminism is concerned. There is no denying that bfing is best for baby in nutritional terms but there is a feminist argument that pushing it and guilting mothers into it when they don't want to is another way to oppress women by tying them to their babies and ensuring that men get off scott free from the responsibility of feeding their newborn children.

I'm conflicted about it. I bfed two children and found it a massive chore but I'm also glad I did it. I do agree that women shouldn't be pushed into it, and that partners essentially should have no say in the matter as it's not their body doing the work, but I am in favour at the same time of bfing being promoted and supported in a comprehensive and useful way. I emphasise the supported aspect because in my experience at the moment bfing is pushed on women without any real support being offered. As such, it is simply a stick to beat women with and so in terms of how bfing is handled by the NHS currently it is a massive feminist issue. Basically it's beyond fucking ridiculous to bang on on and on and on and on about bfing only to tell a struggling new mum that no help is available to her when she can't get bfing going. I had some horrendous NHS experiences around bfing when my DD was little (related to having a biopsy, I'll tell the full story if you're interested) and I complained. I got one good response and the rest was the usual defensive bullshit but I think it made some small difference.

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:13

Hi Crumple, hope to hear more from you :)

Unwitting: "I have a question. On "that thread" the problem of FWR being ranty kept coming up.

I am very cross about the fact that the world discriminates against me due to my lack of willy. Surely being ranty is a very sensible response? I don't recall any social change movement in history being about nice chitchat and cups of tea?

It feels like the accusations I get at work about being "too emotional" when actually I just give a shit and am passionate about something.

Do we have to be "nice"?"

Some others have addressed your question and I agree with what they say. Also, I think, when women first encounter feminism many feel a sense of vertigo, like the world they once knew and trusted is falling away. It can be incredibly scary to think that the people around you who professed to have your best interests at heart, even those who love you, could deep down see you as inferior and be colluding in certain ways to ensure your success and stability are so much harder to maintain than that of men. Challenging a person's world view, making them feel unsure of everything, definitely comes across as an attack and I can understand the defensiveness many women feel - the sense that it's all too much and can we just hide away from it a bit?

But, to answer your question, no, we don't have to be "nice."

OP posts:
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 31/10/2014 13:11

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:07

Oops Flowers

OP posts:
cailindana · 31/10/2014 13:07

Buffy please feel free to be on the "panel" :) Nice to see you flowers

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread