Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Thinking out loud about nail varnish...

86 replies

StevesBollockAnalogy · 10/09/2014 13:07

Okay so I suppose this is more for my benefit than anyone else's, but I'd be interested to hear what other people have to say and what your opinions are!

So when I heard about the nail varnish that detects the date rape drugs I was angry, but couldn't express why. I have since thought about it quite a lot and this is the conclusion that I've come to.

Even if we only consider rape cases in which the victim is in a night club, approached by a strange man etc. (which are by far not the norm and in the vast majority of rape cases special nail varnish or anything else would be no help at all) and a date rape drug is used, it doesn't prevent rape. That rapist does not go into a bar looking for a specific woman, he will rape whoever he decides to. If she wore a different dress, if she stayed at home, if she was fatter or thinner, if she had a different colour hair, if she detected date rape drugs in her drink, someone would still have been raped. He wouldn't think "oh well, she was the only one I was prepared to attack and rape, now she's detected my drugs I guess I'll just go home then".The nail varnish does not prevent rape, and to say it does is dangerous and misleading.

So say, a woman detects a date rape drug in her drink. She gets the hell out of there. The rapist would not give up and go home at this point, he'd find someone else. Someone who doesn't have that nail varnish. By not being "too drunk", or wearing "slutty" clothing, or wearing the special nail varnish, or going home earlier, you don't prevent rape. You sway the odds so it is less likely he will pick you, he is more likely to pick a faceless other girl. Who drank more or wore a shorter skirt or didn't buy the nail varnish and didn't 'protect' herself like you did. As long as you protect yourself, he will most likely choose someone else who didn't protect herself like you. Some who deserved it more than you. And we all know that leads straight to victim blaming and a whole host of disgusting stuff.

Does that explain it clearly why I'm angry? Am I right- or am I wrong? Other opinions and thoughts are welcome, this is just the conclusion I came to.

OP posts:
thenightsky · 10/09/2014 22:04

It's another tool in preventing/deterring would be date rape drug rapists

But it won't prevent rape will it? It just means the rapist chooses another woman that day. It merely moves him on.

Agree totally with OP.

ReadyToBreak · 10/09/2014 22:02

Well not really, TheSameBoat. If we're all fighting this together instead of making excuses then yes, we can go some way to majorly reducing incidences.

Better to add more tools to the box to fight something that will never be completely eradicated than sitting back and criticising any deterrent that someone invents!

ReadyToBreak · 10/09/2014 22:00

It's a logistical nightmare, I agree.

Perhaps clubs/bars could have their staff members wearing the nail polish and if something looks "off" they can test the drink of the person acting obliterated/odd.

TheSameBoat · 10/09/2014 22:00

I think my reaction to it is "Oh my god, WTF! Is this seriously what we've come to?!"

What happened to the good old days when you could go out, have a drink with your mates and let your hair down, confident in the goodness of human nature that you were gonna make it home without being raped? Hmm

But yes, OP you're right. Protecting yourself from the problem doesn't solve the problem, it just shifts it onto someone else.

PenguinsIsSleepDeprived · 10/09/2014 21:48

I more meant that, for many women, they would feel so wasted that they wouldn't be able to think straight to take logical actions like reporting and testing. How lucky for your friend that she had trusted friends around. x

ReadyToBreak · 10/09/2014 21:21

My friend was! She just suddenly started acting like she was wasted but was also confused as she was only on her second drink so couldn't understand why she felt so odd.

I do get what you're saying as this might not be the case for everyone but certainly in my direct experience the effects were enough for her to know something was wrong.

PenguinsIsSleepDeprived · 10/09/2014 21:16

I don't think that, when you have been drugged, you are likely to be 'with it' enough to start drink checking and alerting people, are you?

ReadyToBreak · 10/09/2014 21:14

When you've been drugged with a date rape drug, from what I've seen and heard from others experiences, you start to feel "wrong" quite quickly. It is then that you could check the drink to confirm?

I don't know how exactly people will use it but I still think it's a good idea.

It's another tool in preventing/deterring would be date rape drug rapists.

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 21:10

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

manlyalmondcakes · 10/09/2014 21:07

But the point of it is not to protect individual women. The point is to scare potential drink spikers by making them aware there is a chance they could be caught. At the moment the chance is pretty much zero as the drugs become indetectible in the blood stream so quickly.

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 21:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 21:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PenguinsIsSleepDeprived · 10/09/2014 21:03

Yeah Ready - but even if you agree with the principle, it isn't going to be enough to check a drink is it? you are going to have to check every single time you take a sip.

MehsMum · 10/09/2014 21:02

Ready, that's what I was trying to say: the staff can be alerted. I hadn't thought as far as CCTV though.

I do agree that the onus shouldn't be on women, but on everyone. But should I advise my student daughter not to carry a rape alarm for that reason? Or not do a self-defence course?

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 21:02

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 21:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ReadyToBreak · 10/09/2014 20:58

Having worked in nightclubs I'm going to go against the vein here and say I think it's a great idea.

If someone sees their drink has been spiked by the change in colour they can alert the door staff/bar staff/club manager and cctv can be checked immediately and hopefully, the culprit caught.

You'd be surprised how much ground those cameras in clubs actually cover.

A decent establishment will take this very seriously.

JustTheRightBullets · 10/09/2014 20:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

manlyalmondcakes · 10/09/2014 20:54

I don't know. I just don't think you would need to be particularly suspicious to occasionally stir your drink with your finger.

I think they've done it to coasters as well.

I think it would put men off spiking drinks if they could be caught by random spills, stirring drinks etc.

cailindana · 10/09/2014 20:40

But a drink doesn't have to be out of your sight for someone to drug it manly. All you have to do is look away for 30 seconds and it's done. If you feel the person next to you is trustworthy testing your drink won't be on your mind. You might even ask the person who ends up drugging you to look after your drink while you go to toilet.

manlyalmondcakes · 10/09/2014 20:39

I don't think the reality in a club is that you are looking for a particular person, is it? The only people I know who have had drinks spiked had no idea who had done it. It could have been anyone at all.

The purpose I assume is to test the drink if it has been out of your sight at all.

cailindana · 10/09/2014 20:34

The thing that gets me most about idiotic inventions like this is that they have no connection to reality at all. The idea of drug-detecting nail varnish paints the picture of the vigilant woman on the lookout for the obvious rapists who immediately (with their rapey-rapist eyes or cheeks or forearms or some such) alert her that something is wrong. I mean, rapists aren't normal men, are they, they're monsters that you can spot from 30 miles away. So, the woman spots the hulking, drooling, monster and she immediately dips her finger and, bingo, drugs are spotted and monster retreats to his cave. Everyone is happy, apart from the monsters of course.

It's all so bogey-man, so Hansel and Gretel.

In fact, what happens is that a perfectly normal-looking man, charming and personable, starts a conversation with a woman who thinks "ooh nice guy," and they stand around chatting for a while, as you do. She might even know the guy, have dated him, or have been friends with him for years. He might be the partner of a friend. Whatever he is, he comes across as "safe" and the woman, like a normal person, relaxes, sips her drink, enjoys herself. She has no reason to feel any danger. It's only when she wakes up later that she realises that, in fact, rapists aren't drooling half-humans who you can spot from space, they are just "normal" men who hide in plain sight and rely on the fact that the whole world tells women that rape is their responsibility, their problem. If a woman is stupid enough not to protect herself, what does she expect?

manlyalmondcakes · 10/09/2014 20:07

I can see what would be more likely to happen:

  1. Man puts drug in drink.
  2. Woman puts finger in drink and finds it drugged.
  3. Woman points it out.
  4. Bystanders call woman crazy and attention seeking and claim she drugged her own drink in order to make false accusation.
CKDexterHaven · 10/09/2014 20:03

Whenever I hear about some new 'anti-rape' device I think 'Does that mean any woman who doesn't buy/can't afford said anti-rape device will be blamed for not protecting herself?'

manlyalmondcakes · 10/09/2014 19:57

They have been very careful in the wording of this, in interviews I have read. They didn't say the purpose of it was not to protect individual women but to make people who drug women afraid of getting spotted.

Which I can see. If at any moment any woman could show her drink had been drugged, it would surely make men using those drugs more wary?

Swipe left for the next trending thread