Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why are feminists so threatened by the MRA movement?

635 replies

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 09/09/2014 18:47

When I was at university, the Gender Equality society (of which I was a member) chose to rename itself the Feminist society, arguing that the only way equality could be achieved was by focusing on women's issues. This led some other students to set up an MRA group, which was met with some resistance from the feminists. On this very board I see commenters angrily referring to MRAs as if they are all members of an evil homogeneous group.

Isn't it possible that men and women both suffer oppression from society in different ways? That the levels of this oppression are not necessarily equal, but are still important if we are to achieve equality? I often see feminists agreeing with certain 'male issues' (e.g. media stereotypes, elevated male suicide rate), but suggesting that feminism has other priorities, and if they want to do something about these issues then they should make their own groups. Why do they get criticized when they do exactly that? Better still, wouldn't feminism be better off if it didn't alienate so many men (and women, focused on a wider range of issues, and stopped pitting the sexes against one another?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
gertiegusset · 09/09/2014 21:15

Men already have all the rights, what more rights do they want?
The right to do childcare...
The right to be SAHDs?
These rights are already theirs.

PetulaGordino · 09/09/2014 21:15

" I'd still argue (pointlessly) that conscription and death in service outstrips other sexists constructs significantly"

Statistics have been posted already, but which do you think is more accurately recorded - femicide and death through prostitution, or death through conscription?

cailindana · 09/09/2014 21:13

I actually think when a woman does the whole "but why can't we work with the lovely kind men who only want the best for us?" that they're really on the verge of having their eyes opened. Because the next step is "Oh, but they don't really want the best for us, do they?"

BuffyBotRebooted · 09/09/2014 21:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 09/09/2014 21:12

TessOfTheFurbyvilles
Surely women who commit domestic violence are more 'privileged' than men who commit domestic violence, because it's more likely that their abuse will not be taken seriously by the police and by friends/relatives? Obviously all acts of domestic abuse are despicable, and services should be in place for anyone who suffers it, regardless of gender.

BuffyBotRebooted
Congratulations for campaigning for men's issues as well. What's wrong with calling that men's rights activism, given that that's exactly what it is? And what disgusting ideas exactly am I promulgating?

OP posts:
Beachcomber · 09/09/2014 21:10

This post is addressed to the women here.

I cannot for the life of me understand why men seeking to end patriarchy would address themselves to women. I mean, what an utter waste of time. Any man who can see that the current set up is unfair must surely be able to see that the people/structures/power holders/occupiers of the mechanisms for change, are male.

Why then would one waste one's time in haranguing the people who are least able to bring about the change one wants? Gee, gosh, I cannot think Hmm

AnnieLobeseder · 09/09/2014 21:09

Because, Buffy, I'm ashamed to say that once I was that clown. I even came on here and had much the same argument with the FWR crowd of the time. I did actually come to the FWR board to tell the feminists how they were Doing Feminism Wrong. They patiently discussed with me what an idiot I was being how things actually are, and I was saw the light. I am always optimistic it could happen again. Grin

LineRunner · 09/09/2014 21:09

I don't understand why MRAs can't choose to do childcare like women and loads of other men do. Is there a special MRA contract they have to sign?

TessOfTheFurbyvilles · 09/09/2014 21:08

I think if feminists are 'already fighting this battle', then they need to show increased recognition of female-on-male domestic abuse

Every feminist I know personally, recognizes F-on-M domestic abuse exists, and finds it abhorrent.

However, it's for men themselves to take up the issue, it's not for women to do that for them. That's something else my brother believes most strongly about.

cailindana · 09/09/2014 21:08

I don't know Buffy. I know I was once naive and nice FWR women helped me out. So I do try to give people who appear naive the benefit of the doubt.

But I am rapidly losing the will to live.

Voix, you think we're all wrong. Good for you. Thanks for you input. We'll take it under consideration.

BuffyBotRebooted · 09/09/2014 21:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

cailindana · 09/09/2014 21:05

Sorry, who's punishing men for "not having a choice" but to go out and earn themselves money and develop a career while women stayed at home and had no money or career and did the thankless endless task of raising their children?

gertiegusset · 09/09/2014 21:04

Who is punishing men for not being involved in childcare and what form is this punishment taking?

AnnieLobeseder · 09/09/2014 21:04

if feminists are 'already fighting this battle', then they need to show increased recognition of female-on-male domestic abuse.

No, see, we don't. We don't need to show men anything. This is a point you're consistently confused on. What benefit would there be to us?

Should men be punished for not being more involved in childcare when they didn't really have any other choice?

Of course they have a choice. They just choose not to take it. Every man at any time, especially with new parental leave laws, can take career breaks, flexible hours etc. But they choose not to. Because patriarchy. You know, the thing feminists are fighting against.

As I have frequently pointed out to you, many men will benefit from the changes feminists are fighting for. But we don't need men to be onside. It would be easier for everyone if they were to step aside and let us work. Even better if they join it. But certainly not essential.

TessOfTheFurbyvilles · 09/09/2014 21:04

Thank you Line Runner - there's a first time for everything!

BuffyBotRebooted · 09/09/2014 21:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HeeHiles · 09/09/2014 21:03

From the Urban Dictionary.......*An MRA is a troglodyte that writes “women’s rights --- ROFLOL!“ and “a woman is the useless skin around the vagina” on Urban Dictionary.

An MRA thinks that a woman should be locked in the kitchen and “slammed and beaten” (a quote). They are scared shitless that one day women might become truly equal and try to use all kinds of defamations and con artistry to keep women down*

Says it all - Tossers!! Nothing here about equality!!

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 09/09/2014 20:59

AnnieLobeseder
I don't want to stray too far from the original discussion in this thread, so I won't address those points in too much depth (although I'm happy to do so elsewhere). I know the EU laws changed, and sadly I think insurance companies were the only ones to benefit from this. Your comments about stereotypes are valid, but I think if feminists are 'already fighting this battle', then they need to show increased recognition of female-on-male domestic abuse, and not leave this to MRAs (and of course MRAs should support legislation to protect women from domestic abuse too).

I found your comments on custody laws more strange though. In a patriarchy, the man is expected to be the breadwinner and work longer hours (in their job) than women. Therefore, the division of labour in patriarchal societies typically sees women assume more of the childcare responsibilities. Obviously feminists are fighting to stop this from being the case, but the fight is not yet won. Should men be punished for not being more involved in childcare when they didn't really have any other choice?

OP posts:
Thereyouarepeter · 09/09/2014 20:59

Is femicide a discreet notion though like military deaths? That's just male deaths during war. Which looks a little low to me so is appreciate a link.

cailindana · 09/09/2014 20:58

-Female-on-male violence is typically seen as less serious than male-on-female violence
By whom? You do realise women get longer and harsher sentences for violent crimes than men? Also when you actually look at the statistics, female-on-male violence actually is less serious. According to the office of national statistics : "Women were far more likely than men to be killed by partners/ex-partners." If you look here you will see that the vast vast majority of killings of both men and women are carried out by men.
-Women are typically seen as better caregivers than men, which seems to be reflected in custody disputes
Wrong. Women are expected to look after children, therefore are more likely to be SAHMs or the primary caregiver, therefore are given custody in disputes. Also, in the vast majority of cases where there is a dispute over custody, the man has either been absent or violent. The cases in which women are absent or violent are practically non-existent.
-Men may have to pay higher insurance than women
-No they don't.

LineRunner · 09/09/2014 20:58

Tess, thank you for your post. Very articulate.

gertiegusset · 09/09/2014 20:55

Thanks for that Annie, I wouldn't have known where to look for those figures!

BuffyBotRebooted · 09/09/2014 20:55

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AnnieLobeseder · 09/09/2014 20:54

These data may be inaccurate, Peter, but:

Estimates of ""Lives deliberately extinguished by politically motivated carnage"
War Dead: 87,500,000
Military war dead:
33,500,000
Civilian war dead:
54,000,000 (note that this will include significant numbers of women)

An estimated 100,000,000 women are estimated to have been eliminated from the planet by femicide.

It's a horrible comparison, but women are being killed faster than men.

SevenZarkSeven · 09/09/2014 20:53

No we don't have conscription.
I'm not sure where does.
Some places have National Service still e.g. switzerland, israel. I think women do it there to though? They do in Israel anyway.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Posting is temporarily suspended on this thread.