Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Why are feminists so threatened by the MRA movement?

635 replies

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 09/09/2014 18:47

When I was at university, the Gender Equality society (of which I was a member) chose to rename itself the Feminist society, arguing that the only way equality could be achieved was by focusing on women's issues. This led some other students to set up an MRA group, which was met with some resistance from the feminists. On this very board I see commenters angrily referring to MRAs as if they are all members of an evil homogeneous group.

Isn't it possible that men and women both suffer oppression from society in different ways? That the levels of this oppression are not necessarily equal, but are still important if we are to achieve equality? I often see feminists agreeing with certain 'male issues' (e.g. media stereotypes, elevated male suicide rate), but suggesting that feminism has other priorities, and if they want to do something about these issues then they should make their own groups. Why do they get criticized when they do exactly that? Better still, wouldn't feminism be better off if it didn't alienate so many men (and women, focused on a wider range of issues, and stopped pitting the sexes against one another?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
StevesBollockAnalogy · 10/09/2014 01:08

Did you come on here to challenge your own opinion or to try to change ours?

You took a whole fucking paragraph to say "Some scientists think male and female brains are different due to socialisation, others think it is innate, I am inclined to agree with the latter." We are not politicians here, say what you actually mean. You won't hurt the poor womenz feelings. It is frustrating trying to have a conversation with someone who keeps waffling around and avoiding the questions.

Here's an idea for you. Let's get rid of the patriarchy and see how many of those issues still exist. Because women will be substantially better off once they are valued as more than the vessels of the children they have the potential to make and objects to be twirled on a pedestal. All of us have everything to gain by getting rid of it.

PetulaGordino · 10/09/2014 01:03

"I've heartily enjoyed this discussion"

I bet you have - it's been purely for your benefit and no one else's

(Apart perhaps from the coining of the phrase "mortifying dickhead", the memes and Inigo)

PetulaGordino · 10/09/2014 00:57

Gender stereotyping is fundamental to feminist criticism, you can't get away from that

The onus is not on me to seek out these "reasonable" forums. You're the one who says they exist, so you produce them. You have said yourself you avoid regular MRA forums, and one of the others you suggested has also proved itself inappropriate. You made snide remarks about me not "going out of my comfort zone" and posting on MRA sites (when I was talking about threats of violence) but have now admitted that you avoid them too.

If you really wanted MRAs and feminists to work together, you wouldn't be on a site where the oppressed group gather berating them for not campaigning on behalf of their oppressors. You would be putting your money where your mouth is and getting onto the MRA sites and trying to persuade them that they are the privileged group and more can be achieved if they acknowledge that

"Challenging" feminists is the easy option. Get out of your own comfort zone and challenge the ones with the power to do something about it

(In other words, be a feminist)

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 10/09/2014 00:56

I'm signing out for the evening now, but let me just say that I've heartily enjoyed this discussion, and I'll try to come back tomorrow to any posts I haven't answered yet.

OP posts:
LaVoixDeLaRaison · 10/09/2014 00:55

AnnieLobeseder
StevesBollocksAnalogy

You've mentioned what these might be 'likely due to', but my point is that there needs to be a serious academic examination of these issues so we can see what they're actually due to.

I know I'm introducing another contentious topic here which is rather inconsiderate at this time of the evening, but I believe that many gender issues are caused by the suggestion that men and women tend to have characteristically different brains. I know some gender feminist academics such as Cordelia Fine have argued that this is 100% down to socialization, but after reading both sides of the argument I was more convinced by other academics such as Simon Baron Cohen and Steven Pinker, who argue that these differences are innate. This is discussion for another thread, but if this were the case (and given that leading academics disagree, I'm sure that none of us can be so bold as to claim we know the truth one way or the other) then it opens the possibility that gender imbalances might remain even if stereotypes were reduced.

OP posts:
CaptChaos · 10/09/2014 00:53

Young men's suicide rates are awful. Why do you think men commit suicide more in the under 35 age groups if it's not because of the unrealistic demands placed upon them by patriarchy? Patriarchy harms everyone, not just women. Why do you think more women attempt suicide? Why do you think that those attempted suicides don't pan out for women? Are we just crap at that too?

I have some expertise in this, so do tell me your thoughts.

CKDexterHaven · 10/09/2014 00:52

You know, I feel so contrite now. This discussion has made me really challenge my values. I'm going to dedicate my life now to improving men's rights and I'm going to begin by mounting a Twitter fat-shaming campaign against men in the hope that it might save lives and improve their life-expectancy. Step away from that manly Yorkie Bar and steak you fat fuck bastards! Don't you want disgruntled care home staff to be wiping your slender arse when you're 103?!

Darkesteyes · 10/09/2014 00:52

Zazzles that is a brilliant list But may i add one.

Criticising and taking the piss and shouting nasty comments at women for being overweight and saying they need to excersise and then criticising and talking the piss and shouting at them when they are excersising.

StevesBollockAnalogy · 10/09/2014 00:45

Right, well first off, congratulations for actually saying something and making a point! Well done.

-Almost certainly due to the patriarchy, and the "boys will be boys" idea, boys are loud and a noxious, girls are quiet and well behaved. Girls toys for example, all aimed at decorating or accessorising. Quiet and obedient past times. Someone with wider knowledge than me will come and debunk that properly for you I'm sure.
-Most likely an extension of what I've just said above.
-Positive discrimination what?! What are you talking about? What on earth do women get positively discriminated for?
-Again, likely to be due to the pressure to succeed, be 'breadwinner', have beautiful wife and family to provide for. I would say that comes under the patriarchy umbrella, but like you say you would need to do more research.
-That is a medical fact. Does the NHS cut off medical treatment to men over a certain age? Does it offer substandard care because men aren't likely to live as long? Not oppression or discrimination there, you're just stating a fact. Please tell me if I've missed the point.

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 10/09/2014 00:45

scallopsrgreat
In some circumstances which I have listed, I feel that women have more power than men. I don't buy into the claim that just because we live in a patriarchal society, it's impossible for women to have any systemic power. How do you know these examples are caused by gender stereotypes? Has there ever been any study of it, or does it just fit in with what you believe about feminism?

AnnieLobeseder
Many feminists (though not all) do, as you say, fight for these issues, albeit indirectly. My problem with this is that they approach the issues from what I believe is very harmful perspective - either agree that these issues are caused by gender stereotyping, or get out. So I don't think this indirect approach is having any impact at all, and so I believe it's important to have a better representation of these issues.

As mentioned before, I stay away from MRA forums because I believe they're not really used by those who really represent MRA, but by very bitter and angry men. I signed up here because it is a real discussion forum for real feminists. At the moment I'm limiting my efforts of convincing MRAs to unite with feminists to real-life settings, but if you can find a serious MRA forum, I'd be happy to argue there too.

OP posts:
CKDexterHaven · 10/09/2014 00:45

Even if boys do less well then girls at school and more women go to university, men accelerate beyond women in the world of work and earn more. So men achieve less academically and yet still attain more money and power professionally.

What about the unspoken positive discrimination that benefits men.

More women than men attempt suicide (I guess it's just another thing we're shit at).

Death rates - because men get to do all the fun stuff like have careers, drink, smoke and eat.

Anyway, women's rights do improve the lot of humanity. Consistent studies by the UN and children's charities have proved that when you educate women and economically empower them it is children who are lifted out of poverty and have better opportunities in life. An end to male violence would benefit men as much as women. Better employment rights would create fairer work environments for all and improve family life for men as well as women.

AnnieLobeseder · 10/09/2014 00:43

Okay, you've added a few more examples. And you say that we are "unwilling to accept the possibility of any explanation which does not fit [our] preconceptions."

What are your explanations for these issues, beyond our current societal construct (ie, patriarchy)?

And again, what do you expect women, who lack any real power across most spheres, to do about it?

Why are you not raising these issues with men? As in, raising the issues in a real "come on guys, this isn't right, what shall we do about it?" way rather than a "look at how feminists are screwing everything up and not caring about men or boys" way.

Darkesteyes · 10/09/2014 00:42

That Robert Webb article is great.

OP Could you please explain the point of the fat shaming week that an MRA group launched on Twitter just over a year ago? They were only shaming the women mind.

And how this helped women?

AnnieLobeseder · 10/09/2014 00:36

I've listed examples where I feel men suffer oppression, so I don't buy into the argument that men 'have all the rights'.

To be fair, the only examples you've listed are female-on-male violence not being taken seriously enough, men not being given enough credit for being caregivers, the old insurance chestnut, poor mental health care for men and men coming off worse in custody battles.

And you have repeatedly been given examples of how feminism is battling all of those things, albeit indirectly. But are any of those things actual, ongoing and pervasive oppression? And if so, who is doing the oppressing? Also, beyond what we're already doing, what would you like women to do about it? We've already acknowledged that these are problems. We synpathise, even if we can't do much about it ourselves.

So what is it you actually want from us?

As someone else asked, are you raising these issues with men's forums? You know, the people who actually have the power to effect any change?

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 10/09/2014 00:35

StevesBollocksAnalogy
Yes, I do think the (non-radical/trolling) MRAs and feminists are working towards the same goal. My issue is that there is no room for debate - unless you subscribe to the view that all men's issues are caused by the patriarchy, you are not a feminist, and you are not welcome in feminist groups.

Here are a few men's issues that I think might not be caused by the patriarchy. Notice I say might, these are issues which I don't think receive enough attention, so it's difficult to say what the root cause is. The problem is debate is shut down on these topics because it's claimed that they don't exist, or we'll just use the blanket explanation 'it's the fault of the patriarchy', and continue as we were.

-The achievement gap between boys and girls at school
-The higher number of women than men in higher education
-Positive discrimination
-Male suicide rates (Is it the result of societal gender stereotypes? Maybe, but we won't know until we research it properly)
-Earlier average age of death for men

Again, these are just a few examples, and I don't want to get into them in too much depth, and they may or may not be caused by the patriarchy. My grievance is that feminists are (in my experience) unwilling to accept the possibility of any explanation which does not fit their preconceptions.

OP posts:
scallopsrgreat · 10/09/2014 00:31

But those examples aren't examples of oppression Confused. They are examples of gender stereotypes not benefiting the entire population of men all the time. But it's not oppression.

Oppression is when the gender stereotype you are supposed to follow consistently puts you below the other gender in the hierarchy and that is then upheld by society.

Oppression is where all the wealth and power in society is with the other sex.

Oppression is where one sex is consistently violent to the other sex to the point where the other sex changes their behaviour and fears them.

Men as a class don't fear women being violent. You illustrated that with your third post. They are frightened of women laughing at them.

NormaStanleyFletcher · 10/09/2014 00:27

I am asking this again as no answer has been forthcoming. Why can you not link to sites where we can join with these MRA's who we can work with?

NormaStanleyFletcher

Please answer this

Can you ink me to a single MRA forum (or site with comments) where I can observe and engage with non tar brushed activists

Or this
Can you point us in the direction of a MRA website / resource / forum / group which you feel reflects and supports your feminist values?

PetulaGordino · 10/09/2014 00:27

" I tend to stay away from online forums which call themselves MRA forums, because I find that they are not at all true to what MRA is. "

So are you also posting over there telling them that they're wrong and should be focusing on men's violence against women?

CaptChaos · 10/09/2014 00:26

F4J? That group run by the violent alcoholic who encourages other violent men to dress up in costumes and act violently? Oh yes, fabulous example of a non misogynistic MRA group. Please, tell me in what way forcing children to spend time with men who have been abusive to their mothers represents a step forward for equality?

PetulaGordino · 10/09/2014 00:25

N

CKDexterHaven · 10/09/2014 00:23

Oh FFS! Why doesn't the NAACP campaign for all humanity? Why doesn't the RSPB campaign for all humanity? Why doesn't Stonewall campaign for all humanity? Why doesn't NUT campaign for all humanity? Why doesn't Save the Children campaign for all humanity? Yeah, Save the Effin' Children, those bastards! Being all divisive and only caring about fookin' children! Who cares about the adults? What about adult's rights, huh? Selfish, bigoted, uncaring bastards, Save the Fuckin' Children are!

Maybe when women are seen as human beings, feminists can start campaigning about all humanity.

LaVoixDeLaRaison · 10/09/2014 00:23

NormaStanleyFletcher
A few posts above I pointed out some groups that I feel do a pretty good job of representing men's interests, and admitted that I tend to stay away from online forums which call themselves MRA forums, because I find that they are not at all true to what MRA is.

scallopsrgreat
I've listed examples where I feel men suffer oppression, so I don't buy into the argument that men 'have all the rights'.

TravelinColour
I wasn't actually aware of that, thanks for directing it to my attention. Now I come to think of it, I do seem to remember some rather stupid advertising campaigns by F4J in the past, didn't they harshly use an image of a female celebrity to push a point? These would be the 'idiots in the group' I'm referring to, but admittedly it does look like these idiots have power in the group. Reading some of those examples, I take back my support of them as an example. I had only really researched their goals (which I support), and not their actions (which seem to be awful).

OP posts:
StevesBollockAnalogy · 10/09/2014 00:20

OP, using the examples you've given us over the course of the thread, I can't see any which wouldn't be dealt with by dealing the sexism and inequality maintained by the patriarchy through feminism. I cannot think of an example of men's oppression that would not be 'solved' through feminism. Correct if me I am wrong.

If that is the case, why is there any need for MRAs in the first place? If the number kne priority is dealing with sexist oppression, then why not call themselves feminists? That is what feminism is for. Why would they call themselves and be part of a movement that appears to (and behaves like) antagonise feminists and feminism- when, if what you're saying is true, we are looking for the same outcome.

scallopsrgreat · 10/09/2014 00:17

"I can honestly say that I have never heard of that site" Use your French dear.

scallopsrgreat · 10/09/2014 00:16

Ha ha Ha, F4J.

We see you.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Posting is temporarily suspended on this thread.