Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is fancying a particular sex and not a particular gender bigoted?

165 replies

ArcheryAnnie · 09/06/2014 11:11

Changed name for obvious reasons.

Provoked by this article - which is getting a depressing amount of traction, by a blogger on twitter called stavvers: www.donotlink.com/framed?43198

Short version: if your sexual preferences are linked in any way to the shape of your potential partner's genitals, then you are a bigot. So, eg, if you are straight, you should be attracted to men who have vulvas, and if you are a lesbian, you should be attracted to women with penises. (This isn't saying "it's totes ok to fancy trans lesbians or transmen", which would be cool, it's saying "if you pay any attention to the shape of someone's genitals at all, you are a bigot".) Any way of Doing Sexuality apart from stavvers' way is creepy and weird, and also cissexist and bigoted.

Most of this was aimed at women, naturally. Men's preferences were an afterthought.

In the twitter storm that followed, stavvers and her allies spent a lot of time tee-heeing about how any woman who disagreed with her was probably crap in bed, and all these lesbians who objected it this were prudes who didn't know how to have sex, were probably just holding hands in the dark, and .....dear god it was like a timewarp into the 1950s. Lesbians who choose not to sleep with people - men or women - who have penises are prudish and frigid! How hilarious! How new!

This would all be irrelevant if stavvers was seen as what she is (one of those tedious people who thrive on being "shocking" and "edgy"), but she's got a depressing amount of support for it.

OP posts:
FloraFox · 17/06/2014 21:38

I also agree Chunder .

Bill as far as I can see, they are not attacking mainstream producers, just lesbians. What a surprise.

The comment that originally seemed to get Lily Cade engaged in this was her comment that she is a gold star lesbian. Questioned whether she would work with a transwoman, she replied that she would never suck a dick. This was the transphobic statement, apparently, because ruling out all transwomen is a denial of their womanhood and their lesbianism.

BillnTedsMostFeministAdventure · 17/06/2014 21:19

"Even if we're totally opposed to it, presumably we would all go to the wall for the rights of the women who do it to choose who they want to perform with. "

  • agree.
BillnTedsMostFeministAdventure · 17/06/2014 21:19

Sorry, I should have been clearer, mine was a general point not specifically about Lily.

It seems (which is good) that lily has a fair degree of choice about who she performs with.

I assume, unfortunately, there are women (straight, bi or lesbian) working in porn who have less choice about who they work with. I assume those targeting lily are also targeting mainstream producers of porn (plenty of which includes two females having sex) and such producers mostly have an eye on what will sell when considering such representations.

Or perhaps this isn't the case and it's all Lily's fault for stating and sticking to a preference?

Chunderella · 17/06/2014 21:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BriarRainbowshimmer · 17/06/2014 21:11

Wants to be validated through sex with women, feels entitled enough to demand sex from women...hmm where have I seen this attitude before?

FloraFox · 17/06/2014 20:59

Bill as far as I can gather watching this twitter fight unfold, Lily Cade doesn't want to have sex with transwomen at all and doesn't want to produce films involving transwomen because she doesn't find that appealing. Other producers of lesbian porn who have been involved in this are also saying there is no market for it in lesbian porn although there is a niche for it elsewhere (presumably male consumers rather than lesbians). This seems to be what is causing the rage - the denial of validation by lesbians, either the specific women making the decisions or the general population of lesbian consumers who don't want to watch transwomen having sex. This is where the accusations of transphobia comes from - the refusal of lesbians to validate the "lesbianism" of transwomen.

There is a noticable tendency for transwomen who participate in these types of discussions online to see themselves as "hotter" than women and to seek validation of that from everyone else. Women become well aware as they are growing up of their place in the pecking order of the male gaze (evidenced by the scoring system used by PUAs and their rage at having to accept someone less than a 7). Straight men would have no hesitation in telling a transwoman she is too ugly for them. Women on the other hand won't come out and say this. Lily Cade for example has made only very veiled references to the fact that the transwomen who are actually putting themselves forward to be "cast" are way too ugly to act onscreen in any capacity as women. The vast majority of women know they are not pretty enough for Hollywood or fame of any type, given the standards applied to women. They're not harrassing film producers to include them in movies on the basis of discrimination. Why is that, I wonder?

BillnTedsMostFeministAdventure · 17/06/2014 20:41

I assume that, as far as porn goes, that which is filmed is that which is likely to attract the largest audience?

FloraFox · 17/06/2014 20:38

I'm no fan of porn, lesbian, "feminist" or otherwise but I certainly admire Lily Cade's stance on this. That whole twitter fight is such an example of male entitlement - demanding to be "booked" or "cast" and paid to be in porn as a matter of discrimination? Can you imagine a disabled or old woman demanding to be included in and paid for filmed sex?

Chunderella · 17/06/2014 20:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EmpressOfJurisfiction · 16/06/2014 22:36

Strapons also come off and can be shared. They seem to have forgotten about that.

Raskova · 16/06/2014 21:43

I'm not sure if my attraction is to men or penises penae/peni nowBlush

FloraFox · 16/06/2014 21:25

I agree when there really is nothing further that needs to be said.

tunip that's probably why Laurie Penny has run away from this. It's getting old to say these things. "Transwomen demanding women have sex with them never happens", "transwomen don't threaten women", "transwomen never rape women". We're expected to pretend these things don't happen.

TunipTheUnconquerable · 16/06/2014 20:33

What got me about the Lily Cade thing is, the transactivist argument is always 'oh, no-one is being told they have to actually have sex with someone they don't want to, it's just that it's transphobic to call yourself a lesbian if you're not prepared to sleep with transwomen'.
However. One of the tweets actually accuses her of being transphobic for refusing to film with a particular transwoman performer.
I don't see how the transallies can keep on and on with their claim of 'no-one is being told to have sex with anyone they don't want to' when it is so clearly happening and you can see it there in black-and-white.
Laurie Penny has really dropped the ball on this one, I think.

WhentheRed · 16/06/2014 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BillnTedsMostFeministAdventure · 16/06/2014 19:26

I am not sure if it is common or uncommon for women with penises in porn to still be capable of fertilising an egg, but there's one difference, along with possible STD transmission for the next difference.

DoctorTwo · 16/06/2014 18:05

There was also this line of argument that Lily Cade had thrown at her: "Please explain how folks are okay w/strap-ons in lesbian porn but not women with penises...oh right transphobia."

A strap-on is completely different to a penis. A penis is usually attached to somebody born male, and the lesbians I know (I used to know quite a few, as they used to drink in my then local and the bar staff advised them to sit with me as I was 'safe') don't want to have sex with anybody with a penis.

Btw, I never brought the subject up, they did, in a "apparently you're a decent bloke ..." sort of way.

ArcheryAnnie · 16/06/2014 10:15

I'd bet that they don't, kim, but the atmosphere is such that anyone who speaks up is ripped to shreds, so the current situation isn't really surprising.

Also - of course - nobody is obliged to disclose their trans status (either way, as trans or not-trans), and nor should they be. It's a private decision for each person. I'd bet that some of the people now being derided online as "cis scum" for disagreeing with some of the more vocal activists are nothing of the sort.

OP posts:
kim147 · 16/06/2014 10:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ArcheryAnnie · 16/06/2014 10:03

What you say is entirely fair, kim147 - except that is now is what is widely seen as "trans activist logic". If this is all that is out there, visible, then it isn't really surprising that this is what will be accepted as representing mainstream thinking amongst trans people, whether this is true or not.

OP posts:
ArcheryAnnie · 16/06/2014 10:00

DoctorTwo indeed.

There was also this line of argument that Lily Cade had thrown at her: "Please explain how folks are okay w/strap-ons in lesbian porn but not women with penises...oh right transphobia."

It should be feminism 101 that being OK with one sex act does not mean that you should be OK with any other sex act, even if some random idiot on twitter thinks they are similar. And, of course, it is also the case that being OK with one sex act on one occasion also does not mean that you should be obliged to perform that sex act a) ever again, if you don't want to or b) with a different person, if you don't want to.

OP posts:
kim147 · 16/06/2014 09:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ArcheryAnnie · 16/06/2014 09:51

FloraFox I saw that RT'd into my timeline, and oh dear god. I was also pretty disappointed with Laurie Penny, who I've previously quite liked (though I don't follow her) parading around twitter yelling "TRANS WOMEN PRESSURING LESBIANS FOR SEX JUST NEVER HAPPENS" when this demonstrably happens quite a lot. And now when anyone asks her to comment on specific instances where it clearly is happening, she's all delicate-flower, can't cope with taking about it. (Which - I generally respect when someone doesn't have the time, energy or mental health resources to engage in a twitter argument, except when they are playing knock-down-ginger like Laurie is, having quite enough energy to make unsupportable, inflammatory statements but then no energy at all to acknowledge people who point out the problems in those statements.)

kim147 the problem is, the trans activists who think like that are the really vocal ones, and them and "allies" even have a special insult for trans women who challenge this kind of thinking in public: "truscum". (What goes through the head of an "ally" who thinks that they are advancing the cause of trans acceptance and equality by insulting trans women, I just don't know.) I don't blame any woman - trans or not trans - who doesn't stick their head above the parapet on this issue, but it really is polarising that the loudest voices on this are the hardline "die cis scum" ones.

OP posts:
DoctorTwo · 16/06/2014 09:44

Thanks for that link Flora, it's quite an illuminating post about entitlement and expectation. Lily Cade states she's 'never sucked a cock and never will' and Chelsea Poe counters with an accusation of 'transphobia'. It isn't transphobia, it's merely that Lily, as a lesbian, doesn't want anything to do with cocks. The only person who has the power to say who Lily has sex with is Lily herself. And her partner, of course.

BillnTedsMostFeministAdventure · 16/06/2014 08:01

Flora, does this same activist also demand that men-born-as-men film with M to F trans folks? Is there a twitter war about that?

WhentheRed · 16/06/2014 02:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.