Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Justifying long term SAHM to DDs?

967 replies

whenwilltherebegoodnews · 19/05/2014 13:35

I have a few friends who, because their DHs are high (6 figure) earners, are able to be SAHMs, and have no intention of ever returning to work. These women are all at least degree educated and previously had successful careers.

I just wonder, in such a situation, how a long term SAHM encourages her DD to realise her academic/career potential, if the example she sets is that her education is only a short term requirement until she meets a high earning man?

I'm not trying to start a bun fight, I'm genuinely interested. My own mother is university educated, and has always worked in some capacity, successfully managing her own businesses with being the main carer, and encouraged me to be financially independent.

Personally, I feel I have invested too many years, and too much money, in my education and career to give it up forever after only 10-15 years. I like to think I am setting a good example to my DD that career and family are not mutually exclusive.

So how does a long term SAHM reconcile this? Am I thinking too simplistically?

OP posts:
jasminemai · 23/05/2014 15:55

Dh refers to himself as not doing anything as he is currently out of work. Same as I did when on maternity cause at that time I wasnt but that doesnt make either of defensive its just is what it is

FidelineandFumblin · 23/05/2014 15:53

just definitely dispute its all out of work people that volunteer

I don't believe we did say ALL jasmine, we were just disputing the description of SAHMs as non-participative.

BTW do you refer to you hard-working SAH DH as 'out of work'? Does he mind?

Retropear · 23/05/2014 15:52

And obviously looking after their own children,being happy,doing what is right for their children and working for their family has no value what so ever.

combusti · 23/05/2014 15:42

It's proof then jasmine. SAHM do nothing in the community. They must be a bunch of mindless lazy non starters. It's just as well they are not in the workplace then.

jasminemai · 23/05/2014 15:40

I never said it was just definitely dispute its all out of work people that volunteer that must be very area dependant.

capsium · 23/05/2014 15:39

So jasmine Where does the comparison stop? Does it mean more that they worked? Do you rate those who only work part time as lesser?

I could say in my experience of being a regular volunteer the ones that worked only did half the work, and took the same amount of credit, using work as an excuse not to do any of the more difficult jobs. However that would be very unfair of me, wouldn't it, because they are still giving up their time. So I do not believe this. Why don't you cut us the same slack? Think, there are reasons why it makes sense, for some, to be a SAHP.

If a family can afford to have a SAHP what business is it of anyone's?

jasminemai · 23/05/2014 15:38

The person who is the main runner of everything locally has 3 paid jobs and organises all community work. Through meeting her through a work thing I just the community group, did weekend charity work for various charities, after work meetings to improve the area, cleaning up off local area etc. My dh was working full time and was doing the youth side in evenings etc.

combusti · 23/05/2014 15:36

How do all these volunteers find the time during theh day to run the breastfeeding support groups, work for the NCT, and la Leche League, organise toddler groups and playgroups, help during school hours to go on trips, help in the classroom etc?

They must have very understanding employers.

FidelineandFumblin · 23/05/2014 15:33

Really jasmine?!

jasminemai · 23/05/2014 15:33

I do think that comes from being around the opportunities though as through work people say can you volunteer for this, that and the other and before you know it you are volunteering and running for everything as they know you will do it!

jasminemai · 23/05/2014 15:29

At the out of school clubs and nurseries I have worked at in the past most of the volunteers worked. We very rarely had ones that didnt but if they did they were doing it in order to get a job. All youth work, early years and primary volunteering including brownies, community groups, surestart board etc was ran by working mums/dads. It might vary from area to area but thats the way thinks are here.

capsium · 23/05/2014 15:28

^suits them. Typo.

combusti · 23/05/2014 15:25

Perhaps community facilities are not important to some people. Maybe to the people who are happy to have their children brought up by nurseries and after school clubs. You don't really need communities for that do you.

capsium · 23/05/2014 15:24

Scottishmummy I fully understand and am pleased to make the political statement I do.

I am content with my choice and I want to be enable other people to make the same choice, if it suites them.

FidelineandFumblin · 23/05/2014 15:19

X post combi Smile

If you hold your breath and count to ten she'll tell us community facilities are unimportant.

missinglalaland · 23/05/2014 15:18

Just a wee bit illiberal Scottishmummy.

FidelineandFumblin · 23/05/2014 15:17

You do realise scottish that SAHPs and retirees are the two main groups who hold our communities together and keep things running?

What do you think this country would look like if volunteering was outlawed tomorrow?

Non-participative my derriere.

Retro the only meaningful part of childcare is the pay cheque, apparently. i didn't get that memo either Sad

scottishmummy · 23/05/2014 15:16

Do you need it spelt out?the individual act of women working has sociopolitical impact
Just as the increasing age of primigravida has a impact inc health provision
Our individual acts are political,and have impact.and that's the op point how does being housewife impact on girls

combusti · 23/05/2014 15:14

Nonparticipative in what- a capitalistic, patriarchal financial system? A system that strives to marginalise and line the pockets of the few. And mothers who don't work are not supporting that system?

Well maybe that's a good thing. Because there is more to life than Mammon.

Most SAHMs are very participative in society, these are the people who are helping their communities, running playgroups, becoming voluntary breastfeeding counsellors, giving unpaid time and support to schools.

These women may be lost to the paid workforce but they are a very important part of our community and society.

Retropear · 23/05/2014 15:09

Soooooo me working in a nursery(I never would as I don't think they're suitable for babies and the research backs it up)ok but me looking after my own babies not ok.

Sorry it's just utterly hysterical that you actually think this desirable.Grin

FidelineandFumblin · 23/05/2014 15:05

Arf @ SAHM = non-participative

scottishmummy · 23/05/2014 15:00

My individual act of working ft has sociopolitical impact.it drives need for nursery and Afterschool
Conversely housewife not working has sociopolitical impact,meaning some women are nonparticipative and lost to workforce

Retropear · 23/05/2014 14:57

Excellent post Capsium.

capsium · 23/05/2014 14:53

Scottishmummy

Something that occurs on an individual level,has sociopolitical significance for others/society

Good, I am glad because there are people that are like me in this society, just as much as there are people like you. And I for one will not be squeezed out....

Retropear · 23/05/2014 14:50

No neither am I.

How exactly does removing choice and making millions of mothers and children miserable become progress??

Only on MN.Confused