Is sex working ever 'acceptable'

"but nobody would give a shit about your selection of reviews designed to show punters as nice men."

Would a typical review such as "had good time with friendly lady etc etc" be too boring for you lot to read? Do you prefer horrible graphic stuff for a bedtime read? I guess that says enough about you lot eh?

"Who wants me to extract the whole of pnet, put it in SPSS and run a random sample query?"*

Go ahead. I bet you have the time to do that as well.

No matter what time of day or night I come on here to post, I always get a very quick (sometimes instant) response from the same people.

"And They Shower Beforehand Too!"

If they didn't the sex worker would either demand they showered first or refuse to see them. What were you thinking?

"... who are abusing women."

Then it's important the sexworkers feel able to report such cases to the police. Agree?

"b) track me down and threaten to publish my personal details so that horrible and graphic threats of violence could be made against me and my family."

Nia's name was used in a recent online article, before you start accuse me of anything.

And it isn't the people who advocate decriminalization who "out" sexworkers by publishing their names and photos in newspapers. The nordic model supporters are the ones guilty of that.

You will also find decrim supporters don't advocate police raids who bring photographers along with them.

To add on to Not All Punters Are Like That there should be ATSBT! - And They Shower Beforehand Too!

The underlying sentiment of "I have performed basic personal hygiene, how dare she not be wild with desire for me!". is so sickening.

What makes me feel ill about the "good" interviews at Punternet, is that the more a women pretends to love it, the more satisfied the punter is. They are wanting to buy far, far more then sexual services and I find it sinister.

vofomasu wrote - "116,919 is a huge number. Out of that many people there is going to be a lot of assholes."

... who are abusing women. You seem determined to make it easier for those assholes to continue abusing women.

vof - I don't think the review that you picked is good, or shows the punter in a good light. He's still summing her up like a prize cow in a cattle market.

I actually have a problem with PN as a whole - but the bad reviews just show how callous these punters can get when they don't get the 'service' they think they're entitled to.

I would also add that the several of the bad reviews indicate some coercion or certainly unwillingness of the women - but do they report concerns of possible trafficking? No - they just leave a negative review.

Oh look, I can do that too:

. She was a little distant, definitely no jumping into a clinch with passion (I'm no Brad Pitt but I'm no horror either, average build, fresh breath and showered).I decided to dine down the Y to see if I could raise out temperatures a bit and within 2 minutes of light tonguing and no other signs of coming she suddenly declared "I come". No tummy spasms, no clenched thighs, no gasps of delight, no clasping of my head to her groin, no biting of finger to hold back cries so definitely a fake.
I'll waste no more time with the encounter other than to say the sex was mechanical and wholly unenthusiastic.

Does this come across to you as blindingly entitled, Vo? Not only does this man want to ejaculate into a woman whose consent he has bought, he wants to own her response as well, complaining that it wasn't passionate (after all, he's average build and he showers, FGS!) and that she faked an orgasm.

When you rent out your orifices to men, Vo, do you feel passionate because they don't have smelly breath? Do you orgasm because they've recently taken a shower?

vof you could start that blog but nobody would give a shit about your selection of reviews designed to show punters as nice men. Punters would be just as uninterested as feminists who think those punters are scum. Who do you think would be interested in your punter bullshit except for punters trying to justify prostitution on feminist boards?

I was going to say I could start a blog of my own and cherry pick ones that say the worker appears happy and friendly. But I wouldn't need to do much cherry picking all the ones I've looked at so far are similar to the above two examples I posted.

Another random review. If Nia Thomas chose completely random reviews instead of cherry picking them her blog wouldn't quite be the same would it?

"The Premises
Discreet premises at the back of Fenny Stratford high street. Access is from the small but free public car park. Clean and well organised.

The Lady
As shown in her photos Poppy is a very slim attractive lady with wonderful large but pert breast and a lovely smile. She is even better in real life. She put me completely at ease.

The Story
I've been to see Poppy twice in the last week as I enjoyed the first experience so much. I was met by a friendly receptionist and offered a soft or hot drink on arrival. The receptionist takes care to make sure guests are kept separate and the whole set up feels friendly, professional, clean and safe.

As described above Poppy is slim with larger breasts and a wonderful figure. I was a little nervous at first but she put me completely at ease. She was easy to talk to and seems happy to take as much or little as you want.

The massage was in a clean room with relaxing music."

Fuck, are you still here? Women being praised for pandering to men for money. What's not to like?

I chose one at random. This is the first one I clicked on.

"The Premises
clean nice surroundings plenty of parking

The Lady
A gorgeous beautiful sweet blonde, with a wonderful smile "

The Story
She enter the room and made me feel very welcome, the paper work [*payment] was done with and on to the table, she has a great touch firm and gentle and I soon relaxed the massage was great she was great CAN'T WAIT TO SEE HER AGAIN I THINK I FOUND MY NEW MASSEUSE I WILL BE BACK SWEETIE XX "

wow this is so sickening.

Oh, and I found similarly sick making ones in 10 minutes on the bus, so not sure what you were looking at. Or is it a case of they don't sicken you?

Which "kind" of punter are you then, Vo ?

Vo

Have you emailed p*net to ask that the said reviews be removed as they are not in the spirit of the site, then?

vofomasu that's an odd first post. You're not a PBP are you?

I've just been looking at random reviews on p'net, and so far I can't find anything remotely like the ones on the invisible man blog.

Just spend a moment to appreciate how large 116,919 is.

If you spend enough hours analysing enough of them then of course you are going to find something to match whatever your agenda is.

116,919 is a huge number. Out of that many people there is going to be a lot of assholes.

The invisible men project does not "represent" anything. A cherry-picked fraction of a single percentage cannot be called "representative".

btw if anyone was wondering who spent all those hours cherry picking parts of cherry picked reviews for the invisible man blog, her name is Nia Thomas (a radical feminist, no surprises there).

You're welcome.