Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Feminism funded by the Rockefellers to break up marriage and family

228 replies

Organic100 · 15/08/2013 13:56

For many years I always knew deep down that feminism had an agenda. It was obvious to me that it was a man hate movement, masquerading as equality. But not so long ago I discovered, from a man who use to be friends with one of the Rockefellers, that the Rockefellers funded feminism in the 1960's for the purpose of creating a battle of the sexes, to get women into work so they could be taxed, and to cause conflict between the genders. They wanted fathers out the way and wanted to make women independent. But when you think about it, many women today are dependent on the state. If many women are dependent on the state, then they're not really independent are they? What the Rockefellers wanted was to make women dependent on the state instead of their husbands. Look up on google, "How the Rockefellers re-engineered women."

OP posts:
MiniTheMinx · 15/08/2013 23:40

Organic100 doing a few searches turns up some info about Gloria Steinmen that suggests that she was in the pay of the CIA. It should be noted that also at this time the CIA owned approx 200 news/media companies across the globe.

"In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer´s "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism"

I'm going to buck the trend on this thread and suggest that what happened at the end of the 60's in response to the civil rights movement which was essentially marxist/communist, is that the capitalist class/politicians/states/bankers (incl Rockefella and several other trusts) realised that neo-lib economics combined with media support for single issue identity politics would ensure that we fought amongst ourselves. Single issue politics whether it be liberal feminism, gay rights or race equality is beneficial to capitalism. We can campaign and talk about everything and anything except one thing......class

I think this helps to explain why capitalism has subsumed into itself all the gains made in the 60s. I would also add that the biggest beneficiaries of the feminisation of labour has been the capitalist, not women. Under advanced capitalism the assault upon what it is to even be a women and the commodification of women is certainly not something that feminists in the late 60's were fighting to achieve.

So a fairer analysis might conclude that liberal feminism under the protection of liberalism & neo-liberalism has been pushed into the mainstream as a way of defanging and de-radicalising feminism and creating divisions within left wing politics.

EldritchCleavage · 15/08/2013 23:22

I've skimmed the links. I want to know what on earth (or possibly, some other planet) happened to that Russo bloke between directing Trading Places and directing that America From Freedom to Fascism bollocks.

Sheshelob · 15/08/2013 23:12

Oooo! Are you The Elite? Do you have a monogrammed bathrobe and a well-coiffed lizard ruff?

SabrinaMulhollandJjones · 15/08/2013 23:08

dumb is wot we feminists iz. We'z so stoooopid. Can't a man come on and explain it all to me?

Cake anyone?

CaptChaos · 15/08/2013 23:01

What's the weather like on your planet?

I can't see from under the large brim of my fetching new tin foil bonnet.

Original poster
Organic100 · 15/08/2013 22:57

What's funny is that when Rockefeller admitted to funding feminism for their own agenda, he was laughing his socks off--at how dumb the feminists were to fall for it. The Elite see feminists as useful idiots, not as intelligent strong women. So while the feminists laugh at "conspiracy theorists," the Elite laugh at how dumb the feminists are to fall for it.

OP posts:
tribpot · 15/08/2013 22:49

No more ideas from me, I'm back to my campaign to stop women voting. It's against nature.

Sheshelob · 15/08/2013 22:41

It is quote of the century.

Sheshelob · 15/08/2013 22:40

You're right, trip. And muzzles. We do too much fucking talking. And thinking.

SabrinaMulhollandJjones · 15/08/2013 22:39

the truth is quickly spreading and men are not as stupid as what the feminists think they are.

Can we nominate for quote of the week? Just too funny.

My car was scratched the other night. I know it was a feminist what did it.

And whoever picked my rather lovely peonies from the front garden? Feminist.

caramelwaffle · 15/08/2013 22:38

That's an excellent idea tribot.

Bonnets, not hats.

But remember - don't be having too many ideas.
It may...turn you. Uppity thing you.

tribpot · 15/08/2013 22:35

I imagine as reformed feminists we should probably wear foil bonnets rather than hats? Hats sound a bit masculine.

grimbletart · 15/08/2013 22:35

I think Oracle mustered a D in an A level today and it's gone to his head poor lamb.

AmandaPandtheTantrumofDoom · 15/08/2013 22:33

Are Lucifer and Satan different?

caramelwaffle · 15/08/2013 22:33

Made my day this has Grin

Am off to Poundland for the tinfoil hats, laydees.
Who needs wants one?

I know my place.

lulz

RubyrooUK · 15/08/2013 22:32

Lol. Grin

tribpot · 15/08/2013 22:32

This thread is ridiculous. Everyone knows it was the Romanovs who invented feminism and that's why the Russian Revolution happened. Also I bet Opus Dei had a hand in it, they usually do.

Mary Wollstonecraft is practically an anagram of Rockefeller - the facts are as plain as day, people.

RubyrooUK · 15/08/2013 22:31

I didn't give an intelligent response. There wasn't anything intelligent posted by Organic100 to respond to.

FreyaSnow · 15/08/2013 22:28

To be fair, I don't have enough knowledge to comment on this. I don't even know the difference between Lucifer and Satan, much less be able to weigh up their relative contributions to feminism. I need more information than the the links have provided so far.

Pachacuti · 15/08/2013 22:26

Because "lol" is the height of intelligent discourse, obviously.

You've had plenty of intelligent responses. The fact that you can't tell that is... well... not entirely surprising.

Sheshelob · 15/08/2013 22:22

Wimmin iz thick an shit, tho lol

LurcioLovesFrankie · 15/08/2013 22:21

No, Organic, you've got it all wrong (patronising tone of voice, masterful wag of finger). Typical feminists = no sense of humour (duh!).

(Did you see that I just did a nice bit of newtsplaining there?)

Earthworms · 15/08/2013 22:18

Newtsplaining

Ahahahahahah hahaha

Fucking brilliant. I shall have to use newtsplaining somehow in a conversation tomorrow.

AmandaPandtheTantrumofDoom · 15/08/2013 22:18

Awww, you came back

Sheshelob · 15/08/2013 22:17

Lulz

Swipe left for the next trending thread