I'm not reading the DM but assuming this is the Emma Way case that was over online news sources a couple of weeks ago the issue was that she
- knocked a cyclist over and didn't stop (leaving scene of traffic accident is illegal)
- then boasted about it on Twitter
- and spouted ignorant crap about road tax (there's no such thing as road tax)
- all this following a history (as revealed from her Twitter account before it was deleted) of texting and using her mobile phone while at the wheel
All of that is pretty uncontroversially bad stuff whether the cyclist cut out in front of her or not . That only affects whether she was unreasonable/criminal to have hit him in the first place. She complains that the public have only had "one man's side of the story" but the incident had gone viral before Toby Hockley was even identified, still less had publically commented -- the public condemnation she got was based entirely on her own "side of the story" before she realised that it was making her look bad.
I'm not surprised that MRA have picked up on it as it's pretty typical for them to start commenting whenever a woman does anything wrong -- but that doesn't mean that it's actually a FWR issue and it doesn't mean that she wasn't wrong..