I read this a few days ago and keep getting the rage annoyed with the ignorance over, for want of a better phrase, historical achievements of woman. And bemoaning the focus on appearance over ability for woman in the media versus men, then in the same breath defending her right to slag off other woman for their appearance - are these not part and parcel of the same problem?
The feel of the book just seemed confused. And I'm annoyed this is supposed to represent and promote feminism - whilst it talks rubbish?
Am I just being petty with this and should just be grateful that a book at least talking about the rights of women made a literary splash?