Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Mid-career retention of women - "we need better childcare provision"

108 replies

tootsietoo · 07/06/2013 09:14

This makes me so mad and I need to rant! I've just got round to reading a month old copy of my industry magazine which has a big feature on women in the industry. Several high profile women were interviewed and a feature of the article was that they were praised for having "brought up a family" and created a hugely successful career. One of them said something about needing better childcare. And another lamented the huge problem with retention of women in the industry mid-career. My blood is boiling. WHERE ARE THE FATHERS? Why does everyone assume that it is the mother's job to deal with the domestics? No one ever expects a father to go part time or work more flexibly when he has children or, heaven forbid, actually give up his job to look after them. And the few that do are some sort of god like creatures Hmm. Is it a surprise that a lot of women will not make martyrs of themselves by doing 2 full time jobs (if they have the choice - I know lots of women don't and they HAVE to do it all, mostly). How are we going to go about making it a cultural norm for men to take equal responsibility for their children? I am going to make damn sure my daughters know that they have to choose their future partners carefully if they want to have a job and career throughout their life AND children. It is not necessarily all the fault of the men either. So many women (me included) seem to feel they HAVE to do everything. And also seem to choose higher earning or more ambitious partners which gives them less power in discussions about who does the childcare.

Thank you for listening!

OP posts:
tootsietoo · 07/06/2013 13:34

No, I agree Bramshott, it is really hard on a family for both adults to be in full time work. It would be so much better if BOTH partners worked flexibly, or took career breaks at appropriate times, to allow BOTH of them time with family and time to enjoy a career!

Sorry, can't write more, got to stop my flexible work to rush off to sports day!

OP posts:
PromQueenWithin · 07/06/2013 12:24

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

FamiliesShareGerms · 07/06/2013 12:23

I don't disagree, OP. One of my pet theories is that longer maternity leave lays down the pattern that "women stay off work to look after children, men go out to work" and it is really hard to shift away from that after eg a year. One of many reasons why we need split parental leave instead.

I agree to a point about needing to help women without children who hit the glass ceiling. But looking around where I work (civil service), with literally one or two exceptions the only very senior women are those without children. So although there is a wider issue about what is preventing more women stepping into the top jobs, I do think that there is a very specific children issue for mothers who want careers too.

StealthPolarBear · 07/06/2013 12:14

Very good points op. One of the reasons I like my current job is we're a small team who all have children and the men seem to do as much of the childcare angst stuff as the women (eg last min annual leave when child sick, amending hours to do school drop off...)

Bramshott · 07/06/2013 12:11

Oh god how depressing.

How about we start a conversation about changing the outdated rhetoric that building a successful career depends on you being in the office 9-5 (for which read of course 8-7) five days a week... That worked when families had one breadwinner who was able to concentrate on work to the exclusion of all other stuff (and I don't just mean the kids there, I mean domestic work, arrangements for house maintenance, community activities, care of elderly parents etc too). But it simply isn't possible to function long-term if both adults in a family are out of the house 7am - 8pm, HOWEVER good your childcare provision.

UptoapointLordCopper · 07/06/2013 12:01

I agree that childcare is an extremely important topic. Having attended a few meetings about retention of women, I found that:

  1. It is depressing, as you said, that this is a woman's issue.

  2. There are women without children. They too face some mysterious Hmm barriers at work which has nothing to do with childcare. We never get to talk about that because we spend all our time talking about childcare. We alienate such women by not addressing their concerns.

  3. I find that the lack of will of some employers in childcare provision means that we can talk all we like and provide as much flexibility as humanly possible, but in the end what is needed was the employer putting in some money. If that is not forthcoming it seems all doomed ... Again, it is, or ought to be, in everyone's interest to nurture the next generation, but no, it's a woman's problem ....

Women face more barriers than childcare. I find it frustrating that we never get to the bottom of that.

As it is, I make it my mission to substitute the word "mother" with parent/carer whenever I can and invite as many men as possible to attend meetings and give their views... Some say it's political correctness. I say there is not nearly enough of it.

PromQueenWithin · 07/06/2013 11:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

UptoapointLordCopper · 07/06/2013 10:07

I know what you mean. All discussions on how to retain women in their careers that I've been involved in more or less end up in a discussion about childcare. I see that in the state we are in at the moment, childcare tends to be a big issue for women, but I think we simply need to do more than that. One reason is as you have said about partners taking equal responsibility. The other is that some research show that single women without children still do not progress as well as married men with children (in academia, at least). If we continue to be mired in childcare debate we will not be able to deal with this issue.