Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Women have their little careers till they have babies. Then they do as little as possible, preferably not working at all after that

531 replies

StealthPolarBear · 03/04/2013 13:27

I am infuriated by this attitude which seems to be prevalent. After women have had babies they only work if they have to, and go part time if they can. But I can't put into words why I work - why wouldn't I? I work for the same reasons as I did before I had children. I work for the same reasons as DH works.
Either of us could give up work and we'd cope. But that was true pre-children. Women continuing to work FT seems to be a slur on their man's ability to 'provide'.

OP posts:
StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 18:19

X posts sorry.
I like the analogy with advertising and do agree to some extent. For me, more than anything, teaching children to question "the way things are" is of crucial importance. I many not have children, but as a year six teacher I feel massively privileged to be in the position where my pupils are just starting to know their own minds and form their own opinions.

StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 18:17

In that case what, practically, can you do with those rude comments questioning your decisions, apart from a short "it works for us, thanks."
You can do nothing apart from setting your own example, and it still seems to yet again boil down to women belittling other women's decisions.

StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 18:16

Completely agree, and have argued against the "have a career to be a role model" argument further up/down.
Stuffez, I suppose it's the same argument as advertising. Many people claim advertising doesn't work on them. Advertising and culture influence almost all of us to varying degrees.

OP posts:
seeker · 04/04/2013 18:12

"Stuffez because society's assumptions can limit real people. They can make girls think that that is what is expected of them. They allow a generation of men to believe that their career take precendence. And they cause me to scream myself hoarse in my head. Having something important to you dismissed is quite irritating - and rightly so I'd say.

Absolutely. I have always made it very clear to y children that I had a career-and a very successful one before I decided to stop it to be at home. And I bang on at tedious length about how we came to the decision and why and we have always made sure that they have loads of different role models who have different priorities. Earning money is not the only way to be a good role model.

StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 18:05

Why will they be limited though? Mine certainly weren't and won't be. If FB is anything to go by (ha!) my peers are all achieving well in their respective careers. You simply cannot change the mindsets of people who make downright rude comments like that. All you can do is set a positive example to your OWN children of what a healthy parental relationship looks like.
And no children for me, so a non issue on that front!

StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 18:01

Maybe if you have a DD you'll give a flying fuck about how her career choices may be limited as an adult because women raise the children while men work. I certainly do. I don't want my DD to be influenced by constraints of society, but I'm sure she will be, we all are.

OP posts:
StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 18:00

Yes, agree with that. Just to clarify again, I am not talking particularly about snotty comments directed at me. I'm talking about conversations that have involved the phrases "well of course she'll be looking to go back part time", "Hopoefully he will get a job and then she won't have to return to work" "Don't you find it hard, working full time with a husband and two children?"

OP posts:
StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 17:59

And if I did have children I genuinely can't imagine giving two flying fucks what anyone thought of my decision to work.

StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 17:58

Then surely the work issue needs discussing before having babies, because i could NEVER have a child with a man who believed his career was any more "special" than mine.
I'd be interested to know from people on here who received snotty, nosy comments about working post birth, whether those comments came from men or women.
I know as a childless woman, my experience is limited, but I do think we are lucky to live in a country where couples can make the decision themselves.

blueberryupsidedown · 04/04/2013 17:56

My assumption when I was growing up was that I was going to work and never wanted to get married and didn't want children. Now I'm married with two kids and working as a childminder. Sometimes life just takes its own course...

But when I go back home (where childcare is very cheap, available, not perfect but very much subsidised) nearly all mums go back to work.
It's a debate on many other boards but I know from experience that if childcare is very cheap, most women will go back to work. When the new childcare system was introduced (about 15 years ago) the working culture changed overnight. It costs about £5 a day - a DAY - to send a child to a state run nursery.

StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 17:56

I don't understand that

OP posts:
Wishiwasanheiress · 04/04/2013 17:53

Or ur in a job where it's irrelevant?

Gosh do I wish that for my dds....

StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 17:52

After all if the majority of people assume that girls will grow up to be nurses, and boys will grow up to be the doctors, I'd consider that something to get annoyed about.

OP posts:
StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 17:51

badguider, I too went to a CM. I wasn't aware of nurseries as there are now, although of course there may have been. My dad worked 9-5 and my mum shifts so the CM was there as a stopgap.

OP posts:
StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 17:50

Stuffez because society's assumptions can limit real people. They can make girls think that that is what is expected of them. They allow a generation of men to believe that their career take precendence. And they cause me to scream myself hoarse in my head. :o Having something important to you dismissed is quite irritating - and rightly so I'd say.

OP posts:
Wishiwasanheiress · 04/04/2013 17:49

We do talk. I am pleased we can. Its better than when i started work, might be great by time dds grandchildten do work! Just "the rules" make many of us compromise in order to keep us fitting in without rocking the boat. I'd like to change those rules is all I'm sayin' I'd like it better, now.

But I'm impatient. ;)

badguider · 04/04/2013 17:46

I would be interested to know how working patterns have changed in the last 30 years.
When I was in primary school (1980s) those friends at school who didn't have a parent at home to go to straight after school were a tiny minority. There were no afterschool clubs either, most went to a grandparent's and there were a few childminders but not many. I don't know if this was my area or a national picutre.

[my mum worked nightshift and dad worked from home so it's not that all those families had a sAHP).

StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 17:46

What I think is that it really doesn't matter what other people ASSUME. Why does it?

StealthPolarBear · 04/04/2013 17:44

So it irritates you that I'm irritated? Confused

OP posts:
StuffezLaBouche · 04/04/2013 17:41

Have to say, this "assumption" business is pissing me off a bit now. So fucking what if people "assume?" I just don't get why people don't thank their lucky stars they live in a country where couples are able to talk as equal partners and decide how divide up labour in and out of the house.
If anyone feels the need to comment, what's wrong with a polite "it works for us, thanks." ?

Wishiwasanheiress · 04/04/2013 17:39

Er not in my experience. Cannot believe I've met the only women who do this. Men just assume the actual status quo won't alter. Often times I'm not sure they are wrong!

morethanpotatoprints · 04/04/2013 17:38

Stealth.

I suppose I am not able to to fully relate to your OP has it isn't something I find a lot of today tbh. Although, obviously I'm not denying it exists.
I had my first dc over 21 years ago and found it pretty much like that then. Childcare was not easily available and society did really expect women to either have a little job for pin money or sah. They were certainly expected to fit in with their dh. There were the mc workers who were paying full price for childcare but were the minority rather than the majority.
I had quite a shock when first coming on these threads to find i was in a minority group and indeed that far more families had both parents working. I too thought, but what about the kids. I wasn't being mean but the shift in society and my own upbringing and values put upon parenting were different to this. So maybe you don't see the huge improvements that I see, far more choices, more childcare provision.
I'm not saying its hunky dory, obviously still a way to go, but the difference in the last 20+ years to me is hugely significant.
Who knows where we will be in another 20 years.

Tortington · 04/04/2013 17:37

i hated being at home

babies are like leeches

not a lot of people feel like me though tbh

scottishmummy · 04/04/2013 17:36

As i said the only jip ive had about ft work is from women,the face,the why have em
It's all part of presumed maternal guilt and if anyone giving something up it's mum
And it's well embedded on mn,accompanied by research from shitsville uni

Wishiwasanheiress · 04/04/2013 17:35

90% of roles could be done differently from 9-5 mon-fri for example but we accept over years of training that they never wil be.

Unless that belief that roles can be structured differently now with the additional tools of laptops/iPads etc alters I'm unsure how things will change?

Swipe left for the next trending thread