Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

aibu???

32 replies

justaaaarrrghghggh · 15/03/2013 16:27

nc obv.

we are sorting out our wills. i am a sahm with small children. my dh runs his own business which is doing ok, not worth a huge amount but it has potential.

when i die, all my meagre assets will go straight to dh.

when dh dies, the accountant is proposing that all or a large proportion of our assets go into a trust, just in case i get targeted by unworthy sorts or i might want to blow it all on lottery tickets. that would mean that i'd have to get permission from the trustees to get stuff out of the trust, presumably justify and convince them that i can have it. effectively i would not have total control over my own assets.

since i don't seem to like that idea, they are also suggesting that a proportion of the estate goes into trust for our children so that i can't blow all their inheritance too.

aibu to be offended by this? i believe our estate should be treated the same regardless of who dies first. ie. it goes to the other, with no conditions or checks.

perhaps i'm missing some important point here...

OP posts:
justaaaarrrghghggh · 15/03/2013 17:54

yes

OP posts:
PromQueenWithin · 15/03/2013 16:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

justaaaarrrghghggh · 15/03/2013 16:44

yes, Stella. that would be an argument - to make sure any other children i had didn't benefit from dh's assets.

this is horrible from so many angles.

OP posts:
kim147 · 15/03/2013 16:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AuntieStella · 15/03/2013 16:34

There is at least one MNetter who is a will writer, and may be able to help you on this. But leaving a proportion of an estate directly to the children can (I think) have tax advantages, and it needs to go into trust until they reach their majority. No reason why you should not be their trustee.

What sort of trust was being proposed if it always all left to you in the first instance? I don't know if there are tax issues (suspect not between spouses), but it might be a vehicle to ensure that you enjoy the benefit of that inheritance during your life time, but any that's left on your death must go to the children of the marriage, not to any subsequent ones you might go on to have.

PromQueenWithin · 15/03/2013 16:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LaurieFairyCake · 15/03/2013 16:28

Yanbu

How ridiculous

Swipe left for the next trending thread