Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

new Pope

85 replies

HairyHandedTrucker · 13/03/2013 19:14

he's a scientist apparently. does it give us hope?

OP posts:
Mitchy1nge · 14/03/2013 10:53

LRD - did you go to the secret archives exhibition last year, lux in arcana? Only a tiny selection but it was fascinating

AnnieLobeseder · 14/03/2013 10:52

Well this Jew isn't pleased with him Hmm. If there must be a pope, I suppose he'll do as well as any other. But the whole papacy is just a cess-pit of bigotry, misogynism and abuse-covering-up. It makes me sick and needs to be completely dismantled and rebuilt into something with at least a vague connection to the real world.

Mandytm · 14/03/2013 10:43

All the popes look the same to me.

At least this one wasn't in the hitler youth.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 14/03/2013 10:36

I find it immensely disturbing he had to campaign for the baptism of children of single mothers. Sad But as with the golden throne, I'm not blaming him, just being depressed by the situation.

I wish they'd let more people into the Vatican library, but we'll see ...

Mitchy1nge · 14/03/2013 10:10

nooooo they mustn't sell all their treasures Shock

am sure it is not his personal property to dispose of anyway

noblegiraffe · 14/03/2013 09:32

The golden throne isn't his fault? No, it's not, I'm just wondering if he'll preach against poverty while sitting in it, or refuse and continue to live a more frugal life, or whether he'll sell it all off and give the money to CAFOD.

Mitchy1nge · 14/03/2013 09:23

that is hardly his fault is it!

The Jews seem pleased with him anyway, jpost

noblegiraffe · 14/03/2013 09:05

I wonder how a Pope who is so against social inequality will deal with sitting on a golden throne surrounded by priceless artworks.

scaevola · 14/03/2013 08:27

I took it to mean that he's against the trappings of clerical life especially where it leads to hypocrisy; he didn't live in the Palace and continued to work hands on with the destitute.

If reminding Catholics of their obligations to help the sick and those on the margins of society is risible, then yes I suppose there is no reason to hope the changes he has supported to date will bring positives either to the Church or to society.

Of course, it's far too early to tell how far he will bring his existing attitudes into the Vatican.

Sausageeggbacon · 14/03/2013 08:17

PMSL scaevola does this mean we have a Pope who is more liberal then rad feminist re the Prostitutes?

scaevola · 13/03/2013 22:43

This is the article that Wiki quotes. It says that his intercession probably secured their freedom.

Interesting too that he campaigned to permit the baptism of the children of single mothers, and that he has spoken against clerical hypocrisy, giving a reminder that Jesus dined with lepers and prostitutes.

mostpopular · 13/03/2013 22:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

SheepCantFly · 13/03/2013 21:45

It's on Wikipedia not very reliable I know under the pre papacy section. There is also a book about it apparently.

scaevola · 13/03/2013 21:42

Sheep do you have a link for that?

At the moment the telly is highlighting his good points (appropriate for today), but it'll be interesting to see what else comes out after the time for initial celebrations passes.

SheepCantFly · 13/03/2013 21:39

He is linked to the kidnapping and torture of two priests in the 80s and the torture and murder of many people in Argentina. Oh joy. Hmm

Mitchy1nge · 13/03/2013 20:32

he is quite progressive though, has a social conscience, thinks women should have more senior Curial positions, and although not pro gay marriage speaks against homophobia

it is a good outcome

MechanicalTheatre · 13/03/2013 20:22

I know what you mean Hassled. I am a little disappointed too. I would like someone to change the way the catholic church does things, cos it has such a massive influence (1.2 billion catholics in the world, after all.) But I am not religious at all, no connection to the catholic church.

But he seems a lot NICER than the old pope, so that's a start.

Weissdorn · 13/03/2013 20:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Hassled · 13/03/2013 20:17

Sorry - I do know why I'm so disappointed. That was a stupid thing to say.

Hassled · 13/03/2013 20:17

I don't know why I'm so disappointed - I'm not religious at all. Good that he ticks the "contraception OK to stop disease" box and good that no link with any scandals, but he's not the progessive I naively hoped they'd come up with. Guardian site says:

The archbishop of Buenos Aires is a Jesuit intellectual who travels by bus and has a practical approach to poverty: when he was appointed a cardinal, Bergoglio persuaded hundreds of Argentinians not to fly to Rome to celebrate with him but instead to give the money they would have spent on plane tickets to the poor. He was a fierce opponent of Argentinas decision to legalise gay marriage in 2010, arguing children need to have the right to be raised and educated by a father and a mother. He was created a cardinal by John Paul II on 21 February 2001.

TeiTetua · 13/03/2013 20:14

Oh yawn.

I take it he's a male Catholic?

Mrsrobertduvall · 13/03/2013 20:13

The word "progressive" and Catholic don't really go together.

MechanicalTheatre · 13/03/2013 20:11

The gay marriage thing pisses me off. He does say we should respect and be kind to gay people though, so that's a start.

What pisses me off most is the condom thing. When the hell are the catholic church going to get their stupid heads out of their behinds and just say it's fine? It is KILLING people.

AbigailAdams · 13/03/2013 19:59

Oh goody Hmm

LRDtheFeministDragon · 13/03/2013 19:54

Hmm. He's against gay married because children need mothers and fathers. Hmm

He sounds really progressive and all.