Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do you think (your) sexuality changes how you relate to women-only spaces?

184 replies

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 09:21

I was wondering how much sexuality is influenced by, or influences, how you interact socially with other women. I don't mean 'is sexual orientation determined by nurture' because that's offensive bullshit, I mean the more nuanced stuff about how you are sexually and what kind of sexual relationships you like to form.

I would like to think more about it without getting into that tedious 'oh, you are a feminist, you have to hate men/love women/mistake 'equality' for 'having no personal preferences amongst people'.

What I've been noticing is, I'm valuing women-only spaces more and more. And this is despite (because of?) the fact I naturally end up in groups with lots of women because a lot of my work is female-dominated. I was thinking about how much I just plain enjoy women's company. And I wonder how much this has to do with sexual identity (I'm rather vapidly and theoretically bisexual but have been married for a short time). And yet, although we're all enthusiastically discussing feminism, and separatist feminism, and all sorts of exciting theories, most of us are married or in monogamous relationships with men. Is there a correlation?!

MN seems also to be full of women who're pretty clued up on how to have a good sex life, and I wonder if that's because we're a majority-female community who get a lot of time to talk 'woman to woman'?

OP posts:
LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:07

grumpla - no, that's absolutely relevant to what I was asking and I think it's important. Maybe we end up selecting feministy-type men and that's what gets us into good strong relationships with them.

I was realizing the other day that I am much happier to discuss feminism with like-minded women, than to argue about it with non-like-minded women (honest!). But I don't mind arguing it out with men. Not sure why?

OP posts:
LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:05

IdCal - no, not stupid at all, just I think a sign of how we do think about families primarily in terms of who's sleeping with whom. But in some ways your relationships with your siblings and parents are at least as character-forming, aren't they?

rhubarb - I have to say, I'm not keen on the 'women are more aggressive' stereotype. I'm sure it can be true of individual women .... but all of them? Really? Nah. But this is exactly what I was wondering, whether for some of us sexuality just fits so nicely with our social inclinations too.

OP posts:
THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:02

And whenever I do talk about feminism to women, most of them cloud over tbh. Whereas men can have some very interesting points to make about feminism and tend to embrace the conversation much more.

Most of the females I know are happier discussing other people's relationships and their latest diets. Stereotypical I know and tremendously frustrating because that's not how I want women portraying themselves.

Grumpla · 25/09/2012 10:02

Personally I feel that feminism has probably contributed to my being able to select a decent partner and sustain a long term relationship with him.

Had feminism not given me the tools to pick a good'un and establish some workable "rules" for our relationship (eg mutual respect / no sexist fuckwittery) I probably wouldn't have stuck around. I am a fairly intolerant person.

Mind you I would have carried on having sex with men. So feminism hasn't informed my sexuality per se, just the sort of sexual relationship I have (eg marriage as opposed to a series of flings)

However that's not quite what you were asking - feminism for me has not been ideas developed in a woman-only context, both my parents are feminists and I have expanded / changed my own ideas as I grew up. Sometimes (often in fact) that was a fairly solitary process.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 09:58

Hmmm not really. I have worked in women only environments too and for women bosses and in my experience they tend to be a lot more competitive. To me, it's always as if women have something to prove. Probably because society labels them - a man is just a man but a woman is either a mother/daughter/wife/friend/sister etc. To many women that label comes before their career label.

This makes (ime) women much more aggressive in a career situation, always needing to prove themselves worthy and very competitive in all that they do. You've heard that motherhood is competitive with mothers competing as to whose baby spoke first, whose child is more gifted etc and I find that in other walks of life too.

Whereas lucky men, well they can relax more because they don't have to prove themselves. They are deemed capable just because they are men (although the roles are reversed should a man embrace the role of father and attend parent and toddler groups in which case it's always "where's the mummy? Is she ill?")

I get on, as a general rule, far better with men because it's much more relaxing. But then I don't want to talk about relationships, about who dumped who, about the latest pair of shoes, about which foundation goes best with which skin type. I find those conversations dull and completely uninspiring.

I like Mumsnet because you don't have to have those conversations and for once I realise that I'm not alone in wanting to discuss politics or talk nonsense. There is no competition here (or less so) because the usual boundaries of class/age/looks/gender are diminished. I can honestly say that Mumsnet is the only place where I enjoy talking to groups of women.

I'm not sure that has anything to do with my sexuality, or perhaps it does? Perhaps that's why I generally have more male friends and find it easier to talk to men? In situations where I have been with groups of women, say in ante-natal classes, at work, in school, I've always been quite isolated. They will all get on just fine and arranged to meet-up and I've always been left out of that. I simply don't have anything in common with them.

That's not true of all women I hasten to add and I do have some very close female friends but it's my experience. Smile

IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 09:56

Even lesbians can't, can they - they still have dads and brothers and sometimes sons.

Absolutely, I stupidly didn't even think of that. Blush

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 09:51

I'm probably rambling a little bit, mainly because I'd like to sort my ideas out and that starts with having a clear question to ask!

I know what you mean about those moments when you realize a man you love very much, just 'doesn't get it'. With my it's often my lovely little brother, who is a great person, but occasionally, I realize it's his partner (who is much more right-wing and non-feministy) with whom I have the natural, unspoken connection over something. It's interesting.

And I agree totally about it being an issue because women cannot step away from men as a class. Even lesbians can't, can they - they still have dads and brothers and sometimes sons.

OP posts:
IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 09:49

Coincidentally, I have just seen we seem to have a thread called "sleeping with the enemy" Grin

IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 09:47

Not sure it's what you are getting at, but I do find the more interested in feminism I become the more difficult I find the "idea" of a heterosexual relationship. I love dh he is who I want to be with but sometimes when I am ranting discussing a feminist idea he just seems a bit, I don't know, bored maybe. And I realize how he just doesn't get it which I find annoying.

I just think feminism adds this whole unique spanner in the works in that most women do want to be around men. If it were a race issue or anything like that you can step away from the person or the class causing your problems to an extent. If you are a hetero female that's not really an option.

Swipe left for the next trending thread