Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do you think (your) sexuality changes how you relate to women-only spaces?

184 replies

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 09:21

I was wondering how much sexuality is influenced by, or influences, how you interact socially with other women. I don't mean 'is sexual orientation determined by nurture' because that's offensive bullshit, I mean the more nuanced stuff about how you are sexually and what kind of sexual relationships you like to form.

I would like to think more about it without getting into that tedious 'oh, you are a feminist, you have to hate men/love women/mistake 'equality' for 'having no personal preferences amongst people'.

What I've been noticing is, I'm valuing women-only spaces more and more. And this is despite (because of?) the fact I naturally end up in groups with lots of women because a lot of my work is female-dominated. I was thinking about how much I just plain enjoy women's company. And I wonder how much this has to do with sexual identity (I'm rather vapidly and theoretically bisexual but have been married for a short time). And yet, although we're all enthusiastically discussing feminism, and separatist feminism, and all sorts of exciting theories, most of us are married or in monogamous relationships with men. Is there a correlation?!

MN seems also to be full of women who're pretty clued up on how to have a good sex life, and I wonder if that's because we're a majority-female community who get a lot of time to talk 'woman to woman'?

OP posts:
THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:38

"I think the more "interesting" view points (ime anyways) are there because they it becomes a debate for men. Usually about how actulaly women have it better than men. Interesting to listen to because the view is so different from my own. Oh and wrong. "

How is that judgemental statement right? Is that not a view that is open for debate? Or is that ok because that's a statement that sits easier with you?

Hiding this thread before I throw the laptop across the room now.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:37

Sorry, hully. I am up for peace and love.

OP posts:
LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:37

Btw, rhubarb, I am realizing you may not have seen the zillions of comments about feminism being a bit shite on here lately, so your comment about women 'clouding over' when you discuss feminism was probably not meant to imply my OP/this section cloud over.

OP posts:
Hullygully · 25/09/2012 10:36

Oh there's a row already

I missed that, was too busy typing my love for women...

Come on, don't fall out, peace and love and more understanding.

Hullygully · 25/09/2012 10:35

I much much much much prefer the company of women.

I have a number of groups of women friends and I love being with them, we chat, laugh, row discuss, drink, dance...

With mixrd company it can be good too, but invariably better with woemn only.

I have one male friend that I like as much as my female friends and with whom I have a similar relationship.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:35

Oh, come on, rhubarb, I really don't think I said anything nasty or judgemental.

I accept my OP was vague and easy to misinterpret. That's not your fault, it's mine.

I did feel hurt by your comments about women and I did take them as a general one. It sounds as if you didn't mean that ... you do realize, I read them as you talking about, well, women on here?

I was kind of surprised to get that response.

I suspect this is yet again a tone-on-the-net issue.

OP posts:
THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:34

My view?

MY EXPERIENCES I cannot change that. Sorry if you don't like them but I am being HONEST and true to how I felt at the time. If that doesn't sit with your views then I am so very very sorry. But how dare you try to imply that my view of women today is silly and bitchy. I have not said that at all, I was trying to understand those experiences with women who may have raised good topics and good points. I have not said what my VIEW is. That is what I was debating.

Have a good one.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:32

"I just think you are missing the point. You have a couple of bad experiences and aren't tying to meet new female friends, would you write off black people the same way? Or The French?"

How did I deserve that? Where have I said that I have written off all female friends?

Shock

Seriously? Why are you so aggressive towards me for relating experiences that happened to me when I was younger?

Sorry LRD but clearly this is no place for me. I do not appreciate such nasty judgements from people who do not know me and who have clearly misinterpreted my posts to such an extent that is truly hurtful and very very offensive.

This is not a debate. This is only for women who agree with each other and God help you if you question that because before you know it, you'll be labelled as an anti-feminist and woman-hater.

I know this is not what you intended LRD and I have a lot of respect for you and would have loved to have debated with you. But this is not the way to open up a debate. It's the way to effectively close one.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:31

Yes, true ... a hen night in a spa is traditionally a woman-only retreat but I tend to hate those!

That's interesting too, that there seems to be perfectly widespread acceptance that stuff like hen nights are fine to do sex-segregated. Quite a lot of 'traditional' rites of passage have at least some gender segregation. But they're also tied into patriarchial ways of thinking, at least a lot of the time, so I think we don't recognize them as women-only.

I think it might have been SGM who told me that women who have baby showers thrown for them are less likely to suffer post-natal depression, because they typically have a community of women around them. But lots of people will get snooty at that and see it as 'oh, just women having a natter' or 'just an excuse for presents'. It seems a bit of a way of trivializing some of the few mainstream opportunities for women-only groups?

OP posts:
ArtexMonkey · 25/09/2012 10:30

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 10:27

I liek the idea of a female only retreat, I'd feel more relaxed, but I would still prefer to have more than just gender in common.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:25

Nope, not unwelcome at all, rhubarb, just up for debate like anyone else's.

It is interesting how we relate to people based on gender. Your posts and mine and all the others prove that.

What I would like to know is, do we think these dynamics would disappear in a woman-only society? And how big, or how cut off from the rest of our non-women-only, patriarchial society, would it have to be before those dynamics disappeared?

That's what I wonder.

OP posts:
IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 10:25

No, I don't think you are being awkward, I just think you are missing the point. You have a couple of bad experiences and aren't tying to meet new female friends, would you write off black people the same way? Or The French?. I don't think anyone here spends all day chatting about diets and hair. So maybe try and make some new female friends? Also if your relationships with women have been fairly superficial you may not have gotten in to proper discussions with them.. maybe as an adult you will find you have more in common.. teenagers of both sexes seem to spend an inordinate amount of time on their hair.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:24

Yes IdCal possibly that is true.

But I'm off. I have work to do now. Sorry I would love to debate more.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:23

Ok thanks Artex. I guess my pov is not welcome in this debate.

I cannot change my experience. I did say that not all my female were like that and I did say that it was MY experience which would differ from other peoples, perhaps depending on where you lived.

I lived in a very working class area and I had my children in a very working class area. I am still very working class but happened upon a group of friends who were more forward thinking - and that includes female friends now. But it was not always so. Perhaps because of the times (early 90s) or the area or the societal expectations then. Who knows. But if I am going to be seen as anti-feminist on this thread for relating my experiences and not making up something else to fit in with your debate easier then I might as well pack my bags and leave now.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:22

IDCal - oh, that's so true!

I think as well, there's that way we're trained to see the exact same interaction in a woman as 'aggressive' whereas in a man it's 'assertive'. I try to catch myself when I'm making that interpretation, but it is so hard not to!

OP posts:
LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:21

Oh, it's a thing. It was mostly a 70s movement.

But I went to a conference a while ago and I found out there are still women who identified back then as political lesbians and still are today. It wasn't the right context to have an in-depth discussion about someone's personal sexuality, so I am not clear to what extent this was a political choice firstly, or an option they deliberately took up, if that makes sense.

But there are also communities of women who live as 'separatists'. I started this thread because I was thinking of an older discussion we had in this section a while ago about those communities and how they work.

And you can still go on holidays to women-only centres, and that sort of thing - which I would love to do some time, kind of like a retreat.

OP posts:
IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 10:20

Women people say they find all women groups naturally aggressive or competitive, so you think that could be because there is no "natural order"? Where as in a male/female group we know our "place". So there is no need for the competition? I definitely see competition betwwen men for top dog, so maybe they treat us differently because we aren't worthy of being competition.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:20

Not so IdCal. My conversations with men on the subject of feminism is not so much a debate but an agreement. One of my best friends is out in Vietnam writing about the war atrocities afflicted on women by American soldiers. He has some very strong views about how women have suffered at the hands of men. My dh is the same, he'll often point out an example in the media of how women are portrayed as objects and will say as much to our dd.

As for hanging out with the wrong women, well I never did hang out with women, that's kinda my point. I had plenty of jobs in my late teens and throughout my twenties, working for agencies, in offices, etc and try as I might to fit into the social scene I just couldn't. Even at University I found my solace with my male friends who accepted me into their social circle much easier.

I'm not contributing to this debate to be awkward, just relating my experiences and questioning them as you are.

ArtexMonkey · 25/09/2012 10:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 10:18

Political lesbianism Shock I didn't even know that was a thing. I should ad that to the thread in chat about stuff you didn't know existed until mumsnet.

LRDtheFeministDragon · 25/09/2012 10:14

Oh, sure. I was speaking from my experience too.

I do think it is interesting, isn't it, you saying you wanted to be part of a woman-only crowd but the dynamic doesn't work either socially or sexually. Because we all understand and accept that political lesbianism (for example) is probably nigh-on impossible to do. I have once met a political lesbian, and she was really interesting, but I couldn't easily get my mind around the idea.

But we don't really accept that we might have social preferences as well, or they might be interlinked. There are major outcries, on MN and in RL, if men or women declare they want to socialize only with men or women. We see it as anachronistic at best (eg. with monks or nuns) and really cruel or strange at worst.

I was wondering why that is, and how it can fit with the fact that, personally, I want gender as a construct to be dismantled, but I still find myself preferring women-only spaces at times just for social reasons.

OP posts:
IdCalUaCuntBtUvNtGotTheDepth · 25/09/2012 10:12

Whereas men can have some very interesting points to make about feminism and tend to embrace the conversation much more.

I think the more "interesting" view points (ime anyways) are there because they it becomes a debate for men. Usually about how actulaly women have it better than men. Interesting to listen to because the view is so different from my own. Oh and wrong.

Also if you feel women that you have met have been less interesting you have been hanging out with the wrong women, as evidenced by your enjoyment of mumsnet.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:11

Absolutely agree with picking feminist-type men. Most of my male friends are educated and have a lot of respect for women. If I wasn't treated as an equal by a man then he would have no place in my circle of friends.

That's ultimately how we pick a mate isn't it? By becoming friends and sharing common experiences and thoughts.

THERhubarb · 25/09/2012 10:09

I can only speak from experience though LRD. Trust me, I don't want to place women in these pigeon holes but you can't deny your own experiences.

I did say that not all women are like that and certainly my close friends aren't, but when growing up and all through my early twenties I felt very very alienated from women. I felt that I didn't fit it and wasn't accepted by them.

I viewed men as threatening and I so badly wanted to be part of this women-only crowd but it never worked for me. Not sexually but just as part of my identity really.

Swipe left for the next trending thread