Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Porn

114 replies

garlicbum · 22/06/2012 23:21

Giving this another punt, since we seem to be doing civilised controversy quite well atm :)

I used to be fairly cool about porn, though never much of a fan. Now I feel:-
? Too much bullying & exploitation is used in its making
? It promotes too many rape-like fantasies
? Sexual objectification spills over into real life
? Porn gives boys and girls weird expectations of sexual relationships.
I'm sure there's more; just typing off the top of my head.

However, I am persuaded that sexual representation in the arts is not always porn. I've seen it said the Victorians invented porn - and think I agree. It was the Victorians who simultaneously labelled sexuality "dirty" and went looking for it in secret. Women and men have always enjoyed sexy art; it wasn't porn because it wasn't considered shameful.

I believe there is still a healthy stream of sexy art, but have a hard time separating it from porn. I've no idea how one would remove the Victorians' legacy of smuttiness from our appreciation of human sexuality. Dammit.

As a feminist, what do you feel about porn? How have your ideas on it changed?

OP posts:
AnyFucker · 23/06/2012 18:58

wasn't there someone from JackAss who died as a result of his extreme juvenile sense of humour ?

I agree with garlic, and I hate JackAss type stuff for just that reason

mindless idiots being hurt for other mindless idiot's entertainment

itsthequietones I have no idea if your H is a bad man, but he sounds immature and a little bit cold to me Sad

garlicbum · 23/06/2012 18:53

Oh, well done!

I think he's watched way too much Jackass - You know what, this is a really big point. TV shows featuring people who are self-loathing / foolish / misguided enough to submit to painful humiliation make me very uncomfortable. I'm not massively bothered about the individuals involved in the show, it's the message that disturbs me. When audiences are invited to laugh at someone else's pain, many of them will and each time they do, they move closer to dehumanising those individuals and turning others' pain to entertainment in their real lives. So with porn.

OP posts:
itsthequietones · 23/06/2012 18:41

I've had a chat with dh. I just reminded him about it and asked why he thought it was funny. He blurted out that if someone wants to be paid to stick large objects up their arses and then be suprised when it hurts then he would find that funny. Must have seen the look on my face as he quickly added 'it would be funny if it was a bloke having it done to him too, it's not just because it's a woman'. He also said that seeing someone in pain didn't turn him on at all. Apparently there was a scene at the end where the two women turn on the man and try to grab his (rather sensitive at that point) penis, he thought that was funny too.

He has a very black and white view of consent - if you've said yes and have been paid then you do it. If you change your mind during it then you just stop.

He's definitely 1) on your list AnyF, he has no idea. I think he's watched way too much Jackass too.

I used to fall into the first category. Porn really didn't bother me up until this incident, I never questioned it. Reading the realities of it has really turned me against it though.

MiniTheMinx · 23/06/2012 17:03

itsthequietones, I would speak to him, perhaps it is a case that some men (only some) really can not read body language, nuances in facial expression and read emotional cues and therefore they do not see the pain, or distress. Others I think probably do read subtle cues and actually get a kick out of watching women suffer. Seems like your DH is probably the former but without asking him you'll always be wondering.

Is Frueds work pornographic? Yes I think some of it is and not for the most obvious reasons. The painting of the women "Benefits Supervisor Sleeping" is eerie, like all of his paintings he uses a 100 watt light bulb, like holding a mirror up to someone, he paints them in all of their vulnerability, we see something that is disturbing and something that in no way celebrates her naked form, the dirt under the finger nails, the stretch marks and fat, she is sleeping and it seems that we are looking at her without her knowledge, like an inanimate object to be studied and it is voyeuristic. It is as though she at her most vulnerable is an object of both fascination and repulsion. Another example is "Evening in the Studio" where I believe he is mocking the naked women.

I don't believe all of his work is pornographic and I actually admire his painting. I just feel, the intend behind some of the later pieces is spite, repulsion and mocking rather then a celebration or appreciation.

dreamingbohemian · 23/06/2012 16:59

Yes -- I used to be okay with porn, in a much different context. I came of age in the early 90s, in the US, when porn was a really hot issue for the Christian right... and as well, a lot of porn-bashing was also thinly disguised gay-bashing. So to say porn was okay was a way of defending sexual freedom from conservatives (which is a much bigger issue in the US, where sexual issues are more legislated).

Porn was not quite as crazy back then, this was pre-internet, also before the huge rush of sex trafficking later in the decade, still a lot of professionals making it. Not to say it was 'good' but it was nothing like what you see now.

Then tbh I didn't really think about porn for a long time. None of my partners were into it, it wasn't an issue for me.

It's when I started doing research in this area again that I was really astounded at how much things have changed, and really turned against it.

EatsBrainsAndLeaves · 23/06/2012 16:45

I agree AnyFucker. I never thought porn empowered. But before I knew about it, I did kind of think, well what is the harm with it if it is not the extreme kind. But finding out just a little bit about porn, totally changed my mind.

AnyFucker · 23/06/2012 16:31

itsthequietones

I am not talking about your H specifically now, but...

my personal opinion of anybody that watches porn is one of 2 scenarios...

  1. they are uneducated about trafficking, abuse and coercion within the industry. They buy into the myth that women are "empowered" and can become rich from allowing their bodies to be used on film, and hey, why shouldn't they ?

  2. they are fully aware of those things, and don't care anyway . Their orgasm is more important than the chance that what they are using to get off may be filmed sexual abuse

FWIW, I believe that about both male and female users of porn, but we know that most of it is aimed at men and uses the objectification of women as it's basis.

There is a solution to scenario (1). Educate yourself. Use your brain instead of your genitals to think with. Many people who now object to porn have done this, and IMO, become a better person.

Scenario (2) ? Well, need I say more ?

garlicbum · 23/06/2012 16:25

I dunno, I'm just fascinated by what makes an uncoordinated person with no sense of rhythm decide they're the best dancer in the world. How did they get that way? When they compare themselves with good dancers, what do they see? I do laugh sometimes, though I'm not gloating or anything. I don't like the judges being unduly horrible, but never watch the final rounds, so spare myself that.

I think I would have liked the 'cruelty porn' action novel if the author had painted the characters with more depth - it was really only the 'good man' and the 'bad man' who seemed like real people.

itsthequietones, you do seem to be describing cognitive dissonance - conflict between a set of beliefs and observed facts. In your position, I think I'd find it nearly impossible to discuss this without projecting my hopes of finding that on to him. But, whether you can manage detachment or not, you'll probably feel better for talking about it. If you do: am wishing you luck :)

OP posts:
itsthequietones · 23/06/2012 16:14

Katie - I can't idly watch any kind of exploitation, that includes JK, porn, X Factor, etc, etc.

It makes me angry and uncomfortable.

It makes me question myself, my motives for being a voyeur, etc. and the honest answer is invariably selfish. I do not want to be that person.

I totally agree. I started to get really uncomfortable watching X Factor a couple of years ago. For me it was becoming aware of the lengths gone to in order to utterly humiliate the contestants. Seeing people, who just didn't realise what was happening, being used and degraded for entertainment. It's so cruel, and it seems to be a common theme.

We don't have a tv now.

EatsBrainsAndLeaves · 23/06/2012 16:13

I don't envy you this, itsthequietones. But if I was you I would have to talk to my DP about this. There are just too many unanswered questions there.

itsthequietones · 23/06/2012 15:59

Basil, AnyF, Eatsbrains and Garlic - It did change my opinion of dh, I felt as though I didn't know him any more. It bothered me greatly because of how the woman was obviously suffering, but also because he just didn't see that. He genuinely didn't get that it was really happening, I could see the confusion on his face.... it was surreal and I just don't understand it.

This is a man who has never regularly watched porn, not at all in the last 8 or 9 years (to my knowledge), never buys porn or lads mags and who has been to a strip club once with work and vowed never, ever to set foot in one again.

Maybe his reaction to it was influenced by the expectations that men watch and enjoy porn, that the women 'consent' therefore must enjoy it (even if they look like they don't), that no-one would really would upload a video of a woman really being hurt so she must have been acting. Or maybe he really is a sick fucker. I should really ask him.

garlicbum · 23/06/2012 15:03

Minx, do people find Lucian Freud's work pornographic? I don't see it Confused

OP posts:
garlicbum · 23/06/2012 14:57

Oh, god, dreaming :(
Thanks for doing this work. I'm sorry it's necessary.

OP posts:
dreamingbohemian · 23/06/2012 14:30

Aw thanks Eats Smile I completely agree that a lot of people who are not anti-porn do not actually understand what porn looks like these days.

It did break my heart. I really cannot convey how disturbing so much of it was, and not just because I'm anti-porn but because I'm a human being. The amount of aggressive degradation of women was really astounding.The number of women who were clearly in pain doing things that have become more mainstream and they feel they have to do, the number of women being violated in front of a whole room of people, the number of women who can barely stand up and are clearly having sex with people they barely know, I mean it's just crazy. It did make me a little crazy for a while. I won't even mention the sickest stuff I saw.

I would be very worried if my partner was aroused by the stuff I saw -- which was all on the mainstream sites, the ones everyone looks at.

garlicbum · 23/06/2012 14:28

Wow, loads more good posts! I need to go out and clean my brain but am looking forward to reading on.

OP posts:
garlicbum · 23/06/2012 14:27

It's the objectification and the literal way that women are treated like objects or pieces of meat that bothers me - That's the nub of it, I think, Bertie. I feel, too, it's the underlying difference between erotica and porn.

In erotic art (whether it was intentionally erotic or not) there is deliberate inclusion of the subject's character, the artist's, and by extension the viewer's (or reader's or listener's). Sex most definitely is about body parts but it also involves feelings and mutual consideration. Sex that isn't mutually considerate is, essentially, rape.

My thoughts are getting pretty convoluted at this stage: in itsthequietones's story, the viewer clearly enjoyed the woman's suffering :( I'm sure there are people who get kicks out of Old Masters featuring rape but, as I assume the models weren't suffering for real, I enjoy the paintings. This is everything to do with objectification but I can't put my finger on it.

Discussion above, about our 'dark side' enjoyment of exploitative TV, books and films feels highly relevant and, again, I find myself unable to define it. I loved Abi Grant's near-rape recovery memoir because it enlightened me and I was rooting for her to get justice without caving in to well-meant pressure to drop it. I sometimes watch Kyle; I am fascinated by people of all varieties. Yet I slammed a well-written detective novel due to its focus on cruelty: it felt pornographic to me, mainly because the violent acts were more detailed than the victims' substance. I gave my copy to my brother, who loved it.

Teenagers, afaik, tend to sexually objectify themselves - I believe it's a useful stage in assimilating this whole new part of one's being. But, in getting to know their own sexual existence, young people naturally seek feedback & input. When the inputs tell them that men "do sex to" women - and that only a given model of woman is valid - it's bound to skew natural development, surely? The only damaging message my generation got from this process was that women should be thin. Now they have to be not only thin, but with disproportionately large breasts and bums, no pubes and small labia, and to take the role of "fucked" rather than participant. I am 100% sure porn is responsible for this.

OP posts:
EatsBrainsAndLeaves · 23/06/2012 14:05

I think all porn use harms relationships - the harm may be small, but it is there. All porn distorts people's ideas of what sex should consist of and of what a woman's body "should" look like.

EatsBrainsAndLeaves · 23/06/2012 14:01

Dreaming - I am really glad there are women like you doing research to expose what porn really means. I honestly think a lot of women have no idea - unless they are very pro porn! But I admit, I couldn't have done it. It must have broke your heart to watch that happening.

AnyFucker · 23/06/2012 13:56

and, sadly, all those women have blamed themselves

AnyFucker · 23/06/2012 13:55

there have been many, many threads on the relationships board made my women living with men who have a real problem with porn, to the detriment of their emotional/sexual connection with their partner

I wouldn't lay any mutual blame there...the problem is solely with the person who values porn over a respectful relationship

AnyFucker · 23/06/2012 13:53

or more likely, Frances, a problem within the individual not the relationship

FrancesFarmer · 23/06/2012 13:31

I don't have a problem with porn per se but a lot of mainstream porn seems to focus solely on male pleasure and the thought that some or all of the participants may taking part against their will is sickening.

There are people out there making feminist porn and this is a welcome step. I don't think there's anything wrong with watching erotic images made willingly by other people. It can be pleasurable and why should women be denied such a pleasure?

Regarding the argument that porn destroys relationships, I would think that one or both partners retreating into a world of porn is a symptom of deeper problems within the relationship.

BertieBotts · 23/06/2012 13:30

I think it's very telling that those who are most vocally against porn know about what's in it - I know before I was really aware of what most porn is like I was absolutely okay with it - some people filmed having sex/watching people consensually having sex, what's wrong with that?

It's the objectification and the literal way that women are treated like objects or pieces of meat that bothers me, really bothers me. I don't see how anybody can acquaint that with sex at all and it upsets and actually frightens me that people (so many people, apparently) find this a turn on. And of course the fact that a lot of it isn't consensual despite claiming to be.

I don't really understand why porn which is overtly abusive isn't illegal.

dreamingbohemian · 23/06/2012 13:26

Eats, exactly. You can tell sometimes the women have no idea they are being filmed as well. And really, often the young women are so drunk that even if they seem willing it's really their rape that people are watching Sad

NB: obviously I watched this for research purposes, not enjoyment!

EatsBrainsAndLeaves · 23/06/2012 13:22

dreaming - I agree. I have come across multiple situations through my work where young girls - and they can be as young as 13 - have been coerced/persuaded into filmed sexual activity that is then out on the net. And I have also come across teenage girls who think there is nothing wrong with this because "everybody is doing it" - and sadly a lot of teenagers are.

Often girls not making it to be put on the net, but agreeing to be filmed by a boyfrirend who at a later stage shares it with others and then gets put on the net.

Swipe left for the next trending thread